Shunjin Ryu, Teppei Kamada, Kai Neki, Asuka Kuwashima, Yuta Imaizumi, Shunsuke Nakashima, Yasuhiro Takano, Yasunobu Kobayashi, Yasuhiro Takeda, Ken Eto
{"title":"AI-Assisted Recognition of Actual Ureteral and Pancreatic Injuries in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Video Review Study.","authors":"Shunjin Ryu, Teppei Kamada, Kai Neki, Asuka Kuwashima, Yuta Imaizumi, Shunsuke Nakashima, Yasuhiro Takano, Yasunobu Kobayashi, Yasuhiro Takeda, Ken Eto","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted anatomical recognition may help surgeons recognize intraoperative adverse events missed during surgery. We evaluated whether AI-enhanced videos improved recognition of ureteral and pancreatic injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-institution randomized video-review study using historical laparoscopic colorectal surgery videos, 150 surgeons reviewed either EUREKA-generated AI-enhanced videos or unenhanced videos. Five videos were reviewed: three actual injury videos, including unrecognized injuries, and two clinically comparable no-injury control videos. The primary outcome was correct injured-organ recognition. Secondary outcomes included recognition within the predefined injury time-code window and correct no-adverse-event judgment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five surgeons were assigned to each group, with no significant baseline differences. AI-enhanced videos improved ureteral injury recognition in Video A (40.0% vs. 22.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.022) and Video C (50.7% vs. 28.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Time-code window recognition was greater for Video A (20.0% vs. 5.3%; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and Video C (18.7% vs. 4.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Pancreatic injury recognition in Video D did not differ overall (77.3% vs. 70.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.352) but was greater among surgeons without advanced laparoscopic certification (81.3% vs. 63.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.048). Correct no-adverse-event judgments did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-generated anatomical highlighting improved surgeons' recognition of actual ureteral injuries under controlled video-review conditions without increasing incorrect adverse-event judgments. These findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that AI-generated overlays may support timely recognition of clinically important intraoperative adverse events. Prospective intraoperative studies are needed to determine whether this recognition benefit facilitates earlier management, changes operative decision-making, reduces complications, or improves patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN-CTR; UMIN ID: UMIN000059439.</p>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13503624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted anatomical recognition may help surgeons recognize intraoperative adverse events missed during surgery. We evaluated whether AI-enhanced videos improved recognition of ureteral and pancreatic injuries.
Methods: In this two-institution randomized video-review study using historical laparoscopic colorectal surgery videos, 150 surgeons reviewed either EUREKA-generated AI-enhanced videos or unenhanced videos. Five videos were reviewed: three actual injury videos, including unrecognized injuries, and two clinically comparable no-injury control videos. The primary outcome was correct injured-organ recognition. Secondary outcomes included recognition within the predefined injury time-code window and correct no-adverse-event judgment.
Results: Seventy-five surgeons were assigned to each group, with no significant baseline differences. AI-enhanced videos improved ureteral injury recognition in Video A (40.0% vs. 22.7%; p = 0.022) and Video C (50.7% vs. 28.0%; p < 0.01). Time-code window recognition was greater for Video A (20.0% vs. 5.3%; p < 0.01) and Video C (18.7% vs. 4.0%; p < 0.01). Pancreatic injury recognition in Video D did not differ overall (77.3% vs. 70.7%; p = 0.352) but was greater among surgeons without advanced laparoscopic certification (81.3% vs. 63.3%; p = 0.048). Correct no-adverse-event judgments did not differ between groups.
Conclusion: AI-generated anatomical highlighting improved surgeons' recognition of actual ureteral injuries under controlled video-review conditions without increasing incorrect adverse-event judgments. These findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that AI-generated overlays may support timely recognition of clinically important intraoperative adverse events. Prospective intraoperative studies are needed to determine whether this recognition benefit facilitates earlier management, changes operative decision-making, reduces complications, or improves patient outcomes.
目的:人工智能(AI)辅助解剖识别可以帮助外科医生识别术中遗漏的不良事件。我们评估了人工智能增强视频是否能提高对输尿管和胰腺损伤的识别。方法:在这项两机构随机视频回顾研究中,150名外科医生回顾了eureka生成的人工智能增强视频或未增强视频。回顾了五个视频:三个真实的损伤视频,包括未识别的损伤,两个临床可比的无损伤控制视频。主要结果是正确的损伤器官识别。次要结果包括在预定义的损伤时间代码窗口内的识别和正确的无不良事件判断。结果:每组75名外科医生,无显著基线差异。ai增强视频提高了视频A(40.0%对22.7%,p = 0.022)和视频C(50.7%对28.0%,p p p = 0.352)的输尿管损伤识别,但在没有高级腹腔镜认证的外科医生中更明显(81.3%对63.3%,p = 0.048)。正确的无不利事件判断在两组之间没有差异。结论:人工智能生成的解剖突出提高了外科医生在受控视频回放条件下对实际输尿管损伤的识别,而不会增加错误的不良事件判断。这些发现提供了概念验证证据,即人工智能生成的覆盖可能支持及时识别临床重要的术中不良事件。需要前瞻性术中研究来确定这种认识是否有利于早期管理、改变手术决策、减少并发症或改善患者预后。试验注册:UMIN-CTR;用户id: umin000059439。