Added value of dual-energy CT to ultrasound assessment for AJCC 8th staging of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1177/02841851261477082
Yu Hu, Xiao-Quan Xu, Wen-Ting Ma, Ao Li, Yan Zhou, Yong-Kang Xu, Fei-Yun Wu
{"title":"Added value of dual-energy CT to ultrasound assessment for AJCC 8th staging of papillary thyroid carcinoma.","authors":"Yu Hu, Xiao-Quan Xu, Wen-Ting Ma, Ao Li, Yan Zhou, Yong-Kang Xu, Fei-Yun Wu","doi":"10.1177/02841851261477082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAccurate staging is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and surgical planning in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).PurposeTo determine whether dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can improve the accuracy of ultrasound (US) assessment for the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging of PTC.Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included 325 patients with PTC who underwent US and DECT before radical thyroidectomy. Using pathological results as the reference standard, the diagnostic accuracy of US, DECT, and US + DECT assessments for primary tumor (pT), regional lymph node (pN), and AJCC 8th staging were compared. McNemar's test was used for head-to-head accuracy comparisons between DECT or US + DECT and US. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).ResultsDECT showed significantly higher accuracy than US in pT evaluation (0.754 vs. 0.628; <i>P</i> < 0.001). DECT showed slightly higher accuracy than US in pN evaluation (0.662 vs. 0.652; <i>P</i> = 0.250). Combining DECT and US led to higher accuracy than US alone for both pT (0.655 vs. 0.628; <i>P</i> = 0.004) and pN (0.686 vs 0.652; <i>P</i> = 0.001) evaluation, specifically in T3b tumors (odds ratio [OR] 2.024; <i>P</i> = 0.043), T4 tumors (OR 8.125; <i>P</i> = 0.005), and N1b nodules (OR 2.027; <i>P</i> = 0.045). Combining DECT and US was associated with 95% higher odds of accuracy than US alone in AJCC 8th Stage II evaluation (OR 10.000; <i>P</i> = 0.041).ConclusionCombining DECT and US can improve US evaluation of pT and pN of PTC and the identification of Stage II PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"831-840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851261477082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate staging is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and surgical planning in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).PurposeTo determine whether dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can improve the accuracy of ultrasound (US) assessment for the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging of PTC.Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included 325 patients with PTC who underwent US and DECT before radical thyroidectomy. Using pathological results as the reference standard, the diagnostic accuracy of US, DECT, and US + DECT assessments for primary tumor (pT), regional lymph node (pN), and AJCC 8th staging were compared. McNemar's test was used for head-to-head accuracy comparisons between DECT or US + DECT and US. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).ResultsDECT showed significantly higher accuracy than US in pT evaluation (0.754 vs. 0.628; P < 0.001). DECT showed slightly higher accuracy than US in pN evaluation (0.662 vs. 0.652; P = 0.250). Combining DECT and US led to higher accuracy than US alone for both pT (0.655 vs. 0.628; P = 0.004) and pN (0.686 vs 0.652; P = 0.001) evaluation, specifically in T3b tumors (odds ratio [OR] 2.024; P = 0.043), T4 tumors (OR 8.125; P = 0.005), and N1b nodules (OR 2.027; P = 0.045). Combining DECT and US was associated with 95% higher odds of accuracy than US alone in AJCC 8th Stage II evaluation (OR 10.000; P = 0.041).ConclusionCombining DECT and US can improve US evaluation of pT and pN of PTC and the identification of Stage II PTC.

双能CT对AJCC 8期甲状腺乳头状癌超声评价的价值。
背景准确的分期对于指导甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的治疗决策和手术计划至关重要。目的探讨双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)是否能提高超声(US)评估第8版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC) PTC分期的准确性。材料和方法本回顾性研究纳入了325例在甲状腺根治性切除术前行US和DECT的PTC患者。以病理结果为参考标准,比较US、DECT、US + DECT评估对原发肿瘤(pT)、区域淋巴结(pN)、AJCC第8期的诊断准确性。McNemar测试用于DECT或US + DECT和US之间的头对头准确性比较。使用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估观察者间的一致性。结果dect对pT的评估准确率显著高于US(0.754比0.628;P = 0.250)。在pT (0.655 vs. 0.628; P = 0.004)和pN (0.686 vs. 0.652; P = 0.001)评估方面,联合DECT和US的准确性高于单独US,特别是在T3b肿瘤(比值比[OR] 2.024; P = 0.043)、T4肿瘤(比值比[OR] 8.125; P = 0.005)和N1b结节(比值比[OR] 2.027; P = 0.045)。在AJCC第8期II期评估中,联合DECT和US的准确率比单独US高95% (OR 10.000; P = 0.041)。结论DECT联合超声检查可提高超声对PTC的pT和pN的评价,提高对PTC的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书