Annual survival and resource selection of juvenile male wild turkeys in central Tennessee

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Journal of Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2026-08-27 Epub Date: 2026-07-27 DOI:10.1002/jwmg.70255
Christian R. Smith, Craig A. Harper, Lindsey M. Phillips, Joseph O. Quehl, Vincent M. Johnson, James A. Fordyce, David A. Buehler
{"title":"Annual survival and resource selection of juvenile male wild turkeys in central Tennessee","authors":"Christian R. Smith,&nbsp;Craig A. Harper,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Phillips,&nbsp;Joseph O. Quehl,&nbsp;Vincent M. Johnson,&nbsp;James A. Fordyce,&nbsp;David A. Buehler","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Documenting juvenile male wild turkey (<i>Meleagris gallopavo</i>) resource selection, survival, and harvest is important to better manage this life stage, which is the direct source for harvestable adult male wild turkeys. To better understand the relationship between resource selection and survival and how harvest impacts survival rates, we trapped and attached backpack very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitters to juvenile males (<i>n</i> = 136) in 5 counties of south-central Tennessee, 2017–2021. We modeled resource selection using case-controlled conditional logistic regression and fit known-fate survival models to estimate annual survival. We calculated landscape metrics and land cover proportions associated with each turkey's home range using the National Land Cover Database to determine if landscape characteristics were related to resource selection and annual survival. We also analyzed state-reported hunter harvest data using a generalized linear model to determine if changing harvest regulations affected harvest of juvenile males during the spring hunting season. Juvenile male wild turkeys selected smaller row crop fields, less mature forest interior (≥120 m from patch edge), and lower proportions of developed land and young forest. Mean annual survival was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65–0.81) with a harvest rate of 0.03 (95% CI = 0.01–0.09). Survival increased as hay and pasture interior increased in the home range, but this positive effect was reduced as the interspersion of young forest increased. Survival decreased as the interspersion of developed land increased in the home range, but this negative effect was reduced as the percentage of deciduous forest increased. The proportion of juvenile males in the spring harvest decreased from 14.1% to 13.7% to 8.9% as the male bag limit decreased from 4 to 3 to 2. Our results suggest that young forest, which represents dense woody cover, may reduce survival as a result of increased cover and ambush opportunities for wild turkey predators, whereas increased proportions of cover types that provide enhanced visibility and food resources benefit juvenile male wild turkey survival. Given a relatively robust survival rate, regulatory restrictions on the harvest of juvenile male turkeys could increase the adult male population and likely increase turkey hunter satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"90 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70255","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Documenting juvenile male wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) resource selection, survival, and harvest is important to better manage this life stage, which is the direct source for harvestable adult male wild turkeys. To better understand the relationship between resource selection and survival and how harvest impacts survival rates, we trapped and attached backpack very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitters to juvenile males (n = 136) in 5 counties of south-central Tennessee, 2017–2021. We modeled resource selection using case-controlled conditional logistic regression and fit known-fate survival models to estimate annual survival. We calculated landscape metrics and land cover proportions associated with each turkey's home range using the National Land Cover Database to determine if landscape characteristics were related to resource selection and annual survival. We also analyzed state-reported hunter harvest data using a generalized linear model to determine if changing harvest regulations affected harvest of juvenile males during the spring hunting season. Juvenile male wild turkeys selected smaller row crop fields, less mature forest interior (≥120 m from patch edge), and lower proportions of developed land and young forest. Mean annual survival was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65–0.81) with a harvest rate of 0.03 (95% CI = 0.01–0.09). Survival increased as hay and pasture interior increased in the home range, but this positive effect was reduced as the interspersion of young forest increased. Survival decreased as the interspersion of developed land increased in the home range, but this negative effect was reduced as the percentage of deciduous forest increased. The proportion of juvenile males in the spring harvest decreased from 14.1% to 13.7% to 8.9% as the male bag limit decreased from 4 to 3 to 2. Our results suggest that young forest, which represents dense woody cover, may reduce survival as a result of increased cover and ambush opportunities for wild turkey predators, whereas increased proportions of cover types that provide enhanced visibility and food resources benefit juvenile male wild turkey survival. Given a relatively robust survival rate, regulatory restrictions on the harvest of juvenile male turkeys could increase the adult male population and likely increase turkey hunter satisfaction.

Abstract Image

田纳西州中部野生雄火鸡幼崽的年生存和资源选择
记录幼年雄性野生火鸡(Meleagris gallopavo)的资源选择、生存和收获对于更好地管理这一生命阶段非常重要,这是可收获成年雄性野生火鸡的直接来源。为了更好地了解资源选择与存活率之间的关系以及收获对存活率的影响,我们于2017-2021年在田纳西州中南部的5个县捕获了136只雄性幼鱼,并将它们的背包式甚高频(VHF)无线电发射器绑在身上。我们使用病例控制的条件逻辑回归对资源选择进行建模,并拟合已知命运生存模型来估计年生存率。我们使用国家土地覆盖数据库计算了与每只火鸡的家园范围相关的景观指标和土地覆盖比例,以确定景观特征是否与资源选择和年存活率有关。我们还使用广义线性模型分析了各州报告的猎人收获数据,以确定在春季狩猎季节,收获规则的变化是否会影响雄性幼鱼的收获。雄性幼年野生火鸡选择的行作物面积较小,成熟森林内部较少(距离斑块边缘≥120 m),发达土地和幼林比例较低。平均年生存率为0.73 (95% CI = 0.65-0.81),收获率为0.03 (95% CI = 0.01-0.09)。随着牧草和牧场内部牧草的增加,成活率增加,但随着幼林分布的增加,这种正效应减弱。在原野范围内,随着发达土地间隔性的增加,存活率降低,但随着落叶林比例的增加,这种负面影响减小。春收雄幼鱼的比例从14.1%下降到13.7%、8.9%,雄袋限从4个减少到3个、2个。我们的研究结果表明,幼林(代表茂密的木质覆盖)可能会减少野生火鸡的存活率,因为覆盖类型的增加增加了野生火鸡捕食者的伏击机会,而增加的覆盖类型比例提供了更高的能见度和食物资源,有利于野生火鸡的幼雄存活。鉴于相对较高的存活率,对幼雄火鸡的捕捞进行监管限制可能会增加成年雄性火鸡的数量,并可能提高火鸡猎人的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书