Christian R. Smith, Craig A. Harper, Lindsey M. Phillips, Joseph O. Quehl, Vincent M. Johnson, James A. Fordyce, David A. Buehler
{"title":"Annual survival and resource selection of juvenile male wild turkeys in central Tennessee","authors":"Christian R. Smith, Craig A. Harper, Lindsey M. Phillips, Joseph O. Quehl, Vincent M. Johnson, James A. Fordyce, David A. Buehler","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Documenting juvenile male wild turkey (<i>Meleagris gallopavo</i>) resource selection, survival, and harvest is important to better manage this life stage, which is the direct source for harvestable adult male wild turkeys. To better understand the relationship between resource selection and survival and how harvest impacts survival rates, we trapped and attached backpack very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitters to juvenile males (<i>n</i> = 136) in 5 counties of south-central Tennessee, 2017–2021. We modeled resource selection using case-controlled conditional logistic regression and fit known-fate survival models to estimate annual survival. We calculated landscape metrics and land cover proportions associated with each turkey's home range using the National Land Cover Database to determine if landscape characteristics were related to resource selection and annual survival. We also analyzed state-reported hunter harvest data using a generalized linear model to determine if changing harvest regulations affected harvest of juvenile males during the spring hunting season. Juvenile male wild turkeys selected smaller row crop fields, less mature forest interior (≥120 m from patch edge), and lower proportions of developed land and young forest. Mean annual survival was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65–0.81) with a harvest rate of 0.03 (95% CI = 0.01–0.09). Survival increased as hay and pasture interior increased in the home range, but this positive effect was reduced as the interspersion of young forest increased. Survival decreased as the interspersion of developed land increased in the home range, but this negative effect was reduced as the percentage of deciduous forest increased. The proportion of juvenile males in the spring harvest decreased from 14.1% to 13.7% to 8.9% as the male bag limit decreased from 4 to 3 to 2. Our results suggest that young forest, which represents dense woody cover, may reduce survival as a result of increased cover and ambush opportunities for wild turkey predators, whereas increased proportions of cover types that provide enhanced visibility and food resources benefit juvenile male wild turkey survival. Given a relatively robust survival rate, regulatory restrictions on the harvest of juvenile male turkeys could increase the adult male population and likely increase turkey hunter satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"90 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70255","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Documenting juvenile male wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) resource selection, survival, and harvest is important to better manage this life stage, which is the direct source for harvestable adult male wild turkeys. To better understand the relationship between resource selection and survival and how harvest impacts survival rates, we trapped and attached backpack very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitters to juvenile males (n = 136) in 5 counties of south-central Tennessee, 2017–2021. We modeled resource selection using case-controlled conditional logistic regression and fit known-fate survival models to estimate annual survival. We calculated landscape metrics and land cover proportions associated with each turkey's home range using the National Land Cover Database to determine if landscape characteristics were related to resource selection and annual survival. We also analyzed state-reported hunter harvest data using a generalized linear model to determine if changing harvest regulations affected harvest of juvenile males during the spring hunting season. Juvenile male wild turkeys selected smaller row crop fields, less mature forest interior (≥120 m from patch edge), and lower proportions of developed land and young forest. Mean annual survival was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65–0.81) with a harvest rate of 0.03 (95% CI = 0.01–0.09). Survival increased as hay and pasture interior increased in the home range, but this positive effect was reduced as the interspersion of young forest increased. Survival decreased as the interspersion of developed land increased in the home range, but this negative effect was reduced as the percentage of deciduous forest increased. The proportion of juvenile males in the spring harvest decreased from 14.1% to 13.7% to 8.9% as the male bag limit decreased from 4 to 3 to 2. Our results suggest that young forest, which represents dense woody cover, may reduce survival as a result of increased cover and ambush opportunities for wild turkey predators, whereas increased proportions of cover types that provide enhanced visibility and food resources benefit juvenile male wild turkey survival. Given a relatively robust survival rate, regulatory restrictions on the harvest of juvenile male turkeys could increase the adult male population and likely increase turkey hunter satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.