Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery and Systemic Therapy Improves Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2026-08-24 DOI:10.1159/ocl/aebag002
Kangshuo Hu, Xuanhao Hu, Ting Jiang, Xuelian Dai, Yixuan Wu, Zhongxuan Xie, Qili Yu
{"title":"Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery and Systemic Therapy Improves Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kangshuo Hu, Xuanhao Hu, Ting Jiang, Xuelian Dai, Yixuan Wu, Zhongxuan Xie, Qili Yu","doi":"10.1159/ocl/aebag002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and peritoneal metastases (PMs) have a poor prognosis. The efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HIPEC combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and systemic therapy in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to March 2026. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment effects were quantified as pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 12 studies (2 randomized controlled trials), 9 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study), encompassing >2,700 patients. Pooled analysis showed that the addition of HIPEC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.70], p < 0.001, I2 = 18.2%), with a 40% reduction in mortality, and significant PFS benefit (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.30, 0.87], p = 0.013, I2 = 76.3%), with a 49% reduction in the risk of progression or death. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent OS benefits across regions (Eastern: HR = 0.50, 95% CI: [0.32, 0.78]; Western: HR = 0.62, 95% CI: [0.52, 0.74]) and follow-up durations (<30 months: HR = 0.57, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.63]; ≥30 months: HR = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.42, 0.85]). No significant OS benefit was observed in either the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) <11 (HR = 0.71, p = 0.089) or PCI ≥ 11 (HR = 0.53, p = 0.063) subgroups. Regarding PFS, a significant benefit was observed only in patients with PCI < 11 (HR = 0.74, p = 0.043), whereas no significant difference was found in those with PCI ≥ 11 (HR = 0.45, p = 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIPEC combined with CRS and systemic therapy significantly improves prognosis in patients with CRC and PM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/ocl/aebag002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and peritoneal metastases (PMs) have a poor prognosis. The efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HIPEC combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and systemic therapy in these patients.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to March 2026. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment effects were quantified as pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: This meta-analysis included 12 studies (2 randomized controlled trials), 9 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study), encompassing >2,700 patients. Pooled analysis showed that the addition of HIPEC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.70], p < 0.001, I2 = 18.2%), with a 40% reduction in mortality, and significant PFS benefit (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.30, 0.87], p = 0.013, I2 = 76.3%), with a 49% reduction in the risk of progression or death. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent OS benefits across regions (Eastern: HR = 0.50, 95% CI: [0.32, 0.78]; Western: HR = 0.62, 95% CI: [0.52, 0.74]) and follow-up durations (<30 months: HR = 0.57, 95% CI: [0.51, 0.63]; ≥30 months: HR = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.42, 0.85]). No significant OS benefit was observed in either the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) <11 (HR = 0.71, p = 0.089) or PCI ≥ 11 (HR = 0.53, p = 0.063) subgroups. Regarding PFS, a significant benefit was observed only in patients with PCI < 11 (HR = 0.74, p = 0.043), whereas no significant difference was found in those with PCI ≥ 11 (HR = 0.45, p = 0.066).

Conclusion: HIPEC combined with CRS and systemic therapy significantly improves prognosis in patients with CRC and PM.

腹腔热化疗联合细胞减少手术和全身治疗改善结直肠癌伴腹膜转移的预后:一项最新的荟萃分析。
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)和腹膜转移(PM)患者预后较差。热腹腔化疗(HIPEC)的疗效仍有争议。本研究旨在评估HIPEC联合细胞减少手术(CRS)和全身治疗在这些患者中的疗效。方法检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆自建站至2026年3月的文献。主要结局为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。治疗效果量化为合并风险比(hr), 95%可信区间(ci)。结果本荟萃分析纳入12项研究(2项随机对照试验(rct), 9项队列研究和1项病例对照研究),涵盖bb0,2700例患者。合并分析显示,加入HIPEC可显著改善OS (HR=0.60, 95%CI:(0.51, 0.70)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书