Zi-Yue Li, Ying Li, Ya-Qi Wang, Ting Chen, Xuan Xiao
{"title":"How retinal artery occlusion reveals moyamoya disease-a case series and descriptive study.","authors":"Zi-Yue Li, Ying Li, Ya-Qi Wang, Ting Chen, Xuan Xiao","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2026.09.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically characterize the clinical features, correlations, and therapeutic implications of participants with moyamoya disease (MMD)-related retinal artery occlusion (RAO) through a case series and pooled descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 9 participants with MMD-RAO (2020-2025) and 9 cases retrieved from published literature (1981-2025) were retrospectively reviewed to descriptively explore the association between MMD and RAO. Mean difference (MD) was adopted as the effect size for continuous variables, while odds ratio (OR) was used for categorical variables. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the <i>Q</i> statistic and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> index. Publication bias was assessed <i>via</i> funnel plots, and sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants were enrolled in the final analysis, with a male predominance (male:female=1.25:1). Limited improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed after treatment (logMAR range: 0.22-3.0). Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) was the predominant subtype (83.3%), followed by branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO, 11.1%) and cilioretinal artery occlusion (CLRAO, 5.6%). Participants in our institutional cohort were significantly older than those reported in literature (52.89±9.53 <i>vs</i> 25.56±12.58y, <i>P</i><0.001). Our cohort presented slightly worse initial BCVA (2.04±0.9 <i>vs</i> 1.90±0.68; MD=0.14, 95%CI: -0.60-0.88, <i>P</i>=0.711, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=78.3%) and inferior visual recovery (1.99±0.9 <i>vs</i> 1.22±1.14; MD=0.77, 95%CI: -0.19-1.73, <i>P</i>=0.132, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=82.5%), whereas complete visual recovery (logMAR=0.1) was documented in one BRAO case from published reports. The efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) reached 60% (3/5) in our cohort, and the overall rate of visual improvement was 41.2%. Mild publication bias was detected; however, sensitivity analysis verified the robustness of primary results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with MMD-related RAO exhibit unique clinical characteristics differing from those with isolated RAO or uncomplicated MMD. This study identifies an \"older MMD phenotype\" complicated by RAO, and highlights the necessity of comprehensive vascular screening in elderly participants presenting with RAO to facilitate timely combined ophthalmological and neurological intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"19 9","pages":"1766-1776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13501054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.09.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To systematically characterize the clinical features, correlations, and therapeutic implications of participants with moyamoya disease (MMD)-related retinal artery occlusion (RAO) through a case series and pooled descriptive analysis.
Methods: A total of 9 participants with MMD-RAO (2020-2025) and 9 cases retrieved from published literature (1981-2025) were retrospectively reviewed to descriptively explore the association between MMD and RAO. Mean difference (MD) was adopted as the effect size for continuous variables, while odds ratio (OR) was used for categorical variables. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q statistic and I2 index. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots, and sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method.
Results: Eighteen participants were enrolled in the final analysis, with a male predominance (male:female=1.25:1). Limited improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed after treatment (logMAR range: 0.22-3.0). Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) was the predominant subtype (83.3%), followed by branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO, 11.1%) and cilioretinal artery occlusion (CLRAO, 5.6%). Participants in our institutional cohort were significantly older than those reported in literature (52.89±9.53 vs 25.56±12.58y, P<0.001). Our cohort presented slightly worse initial BCVA (2.04±0.9 vs 1.90±0.68; MD=0.14, 95%CI: -0.60-0.88, P=0.711, I2=78.3%) and inferior visual recovery (1.99±0.9 vs 1.22±1.14; MD=0.77, 95%CI: -0.19-1.73, P=0.132, I2=82.5%), whereas complete visual recovery (logMAR=0.1) was documented in one BRAO case from published reports. The efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) reached 60% (3/5) in our cohort, and the overall rate of visual improvement was 41.2%. Mild publication bias was detected; however, sensitivity analysis verified the robustness of primary results.
Conclusion: Participants with MMD-related RAO exhibit unique clinical characteristics differing from those with isolated RAO or uncomplicated MMD. This study identifies an "older MMD phenotype" complicated by RAO, and highlights the necessity of comprehensive vascular screening in elderly participants presenting with RAO to facilitate timely combined ophthalmological and neurological intervention.
期刊介绍:
· International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication
and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online).
This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from
WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed,
PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166.
IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific
Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO);
Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President,
Chinese Academy of Engineering.
International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of
blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of
AAO/PAAO) et al.
Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of
Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and
Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society).
Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press).
Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and
Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics).
Associate Editors-in-Chief include:
Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO);
Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ;
Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ;
Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA);
Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society);
Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA);
Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA).
IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles,
both basic and clinical papers.
Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome
Cooperation organization
International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.