Efficacy of Primary Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Combined with Anti-Obesity Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Harishankar Gopakumar, Christopher C Thompson, Pichamol Jirapinyo
{"title":"Efficacy of Primary Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Combined with Anti-Obesity Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Harishankar Gopakumar, Christopher C Thompson, Pichamol Jirapinyo","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2026.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are effective minimally invasive treatments for obesity. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of EBMT combined with AOMs to that of EBMT alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were reviewed from inception to August 10, 2025. The primary outcome was percent total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included %TWL at 6 months and the rate of serious adverse events. Subgroup analyses by EBMT type and timing of AOM initiation were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies comprising 2,609 patients were included, of whom 2,026 (78%) received EBMT alone, and 583 (22%) received EBMT plus an AOM. Combination therapy was associated with significantly greater weight loss compared to EBMT alone (pooled mean difference in %TWL at 12 months of 3.0%; 95% CI, 1.1-4.9; p=0.002). At 12 months, the pooled %TWL was 18.6% (95% CI, 14.0 - 23.2) in the EBMT plus AOM group and 15.6% (95% CI, 11.6 - 19.6) in the EBMT-alone group. This benefit was observed across both intragastric balloon and endoscopic gastric remodeling subgroups. Combination therapy was also associated with greater improvement in diabetes and MASLD. Initiation of AOM after EBMT was associated with greater weight loss than EBMT alone, while initiation prior to EBMT was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBMT combined with AOM therapy is associated with significantly greater weight loss compared with EBMT alone, with post-EBMT initiation of AOM therapy appearing to be the optimal timing strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2026.08.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are effective minimally invasive treatments for obesity. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of EBMT combined with AOMs to that of EBMT alone.

Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were reviewed from inception to August 10, 2025. The primary outcome was percent total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included %TWL at 6 months and the rate of serious adverse events. Subgroup analyses by EBMT type and timing of AOM initiation were also performed.

Results: Eleven studies comprising 2,609 patients were included, of whom 2,026 (78%) received EBMT alone, and 583 (22%) received EBMT plus an AOM. Combination therapy was associated with significantly greater weight loss compared to EBMT alone (pooled mean difference in %TWL at 12 months of 3.0%; 95% CI, 1.1-4.9; p=0.002). At 12 months, the pooled %TWL was 18.6% (95% CI, 14.0 - 23.2) in the EBMT plus AOM group and 15.6% (95% CI, 11.6 - 19.6) in the EBMT-alone group. This benefit was observed across both intragastric balloon and endoscopic gastric remodeling subgroups. Combination therapy was also associated with greater improvement in diabetes and MASLD. Initiation of AOM after EBMT was associated with greater weight loss than EBMT alone, while initiation prior to EBMT was not.

Conclusion: EBMT combined with AOM therapy is associated with significantly greater weight loss compared with EBMT alone, with post-EBMT initiation of AOM therapy appearing to be the optimal timing strategy.

内镜下原发性减肥和代谢治疗联合抗肥胖药物的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:内镜下减肥和代谢疗法(EBMTs)和抗肥胖药物(AOMs)是治疗肥胖的有效微创治疗方法。本研究旨在比较EBMT联合AOMs与单独EBMT的安全性和有效性。方法:对PubMed、Medline (Ovid)、EMBASE、Cochrane Library等电子数据库从成立到2025年8月10日进行综述。主要终点是12个月时总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)。次要结局包括6个月时的TWL百分比和严重不良事件发生率。根据EBMT类型和AOM起始时间进行亚组分析。结果:纳入11项研究,共2609例患者,其中2026例(78%)单独接受EBMT治疗,583例(22%)接受EBMT + AOM治疗。与单独使用EBMT相比,联合治疗与更大的体重减轻相关(12个月时%TWL的汇总平均差异为3.0%;95% CI, 1.1-4.9; p=0.002)。在12个月时,EBMT + AOM组的合并TWL为18.6% (95% CI, 14.0 - 23.2),单独EBMT组的合并TWL为15.6% (95% CI, 11.6 - 19.6)。在胃内球囊和内镜下胃重塑亚组中均观察到这种益处。联合治疗也与糖尿病和MASLD的更大改善有关。EBMT后开始的AOM比单独的EBMT更能减轻体重,而在EBMT之前开始的AOM则没有。结论:与单用EBMT相比,EBMT联合AOM治疗的体重减轻明显更大,EBMT后开始AOM治疗似乎是最佳时机策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书