Auditory-Somatosensory Influences on Vocal Motor Control in Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.

IF 2.2
Adrianna C Shembel, Elizabeth D Young, Julianna Smeltzer, Roozbeh Behroozmand
{"title":"Auditory-Somatosensory Influences on Vocal Motor Control in Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.","authors":"Adrianna C Shembel, Elizabeth D Young, Julianna Smeltzer, Roozbeh Behroozmand","doi":"10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Auditory and somatosensory systems jointly support vocal motor control, yet their relative contributions in primary muscle tension dysphonia (pMTD) remain poorly understood. This study examined how auditory and somatosensory feedback influence vocal motor control and adaptation in individuals with and without pMTD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty-eight participants (pMTD: <i>n</i> = 17; controls: <i>n</i> = 41) completed a 200-trial altered auditory feedback paradigm involving sustained vowel productions with fundamental frequency downward shifts at -100 cents. The task was repeated with nebulized lidocaine to transiently attenuate laryngeal somatosensory input. Data were analyzed to extract the magnitude and direction of vocal adjustments across baseline, ramp, hold, and aftereffect phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vocally healthy controls demonstrated robust adaptive vocal responses to fundamental frequency feedback alterations in the hold phase, followed by an adaptive aftereffect during the washout phase, particularly when somatosensation was intact. In contrast, when somatosensation was intact, individuals with pMTD displayed greater vocal responses in the opposing direction compared to controls during the hold phase, did not adapt within the hold phase, and showed greater variability overall. Notably, somatosensory disruption stabilized adaptation during the hold phase in pMTD with nebulized lidocaine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with pMTD demonstrated differences in sensory weighting, with evidence that attenuating somatosensory input facilitated better vocal motor adaptation. Framing pMTD within models of sensorimotor control advances our theoretical understanding of the disorder and highlights aberrant somatosensory processing as a potential mechanism underlying vocal instability. Future research is needed to further elucidate sensorimotor interactions and determine whether targeted recalibration of sensory feedback has therapeutic benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4661-4674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Auditory and somatosensory systems jointly support vocal motor control, yet their relative contributions in primary muscle tension dysphonia (pMTD) remain poorly understood. This study examined how auditory and somatosensory feedback influence vocal motor control and adaptation in individuals with and without pMTD.

Method: Fifty-eight participants (pMTD: n = 17; controls: n = 41) completed a 200-trial altered auditory feedback paradigm involving sustained vowel productions with fundamental frequency downward shifts at -100 cents. The task was repeated with nebulized lidocaine to transiently attenuate laryngeal somatosensory input. Data were analyzed to extract the magnitude and direction of vocal adjustments across baseline, ramp, hold, and aftereffect phases.

Results: Vocally healthy controls demonstrated robust adaptive vocal responses to fundamental frequency feedback alterations in the hold phase, followed by an adaptive aftereffect during the washout phase, particularly when somatosensation was intact. In contrast, when somatosensation was intact, individuals with pMTD displayed greater vocal responses in the opposing direction compared to controls during the hold phase, did not adapt within the hold phase, and showed greater variability overall. Notably, somatosensory disruption stabilized adaptation during the hold phase in pMTD with nebulized lidocaine.

Conclusions: Individuals with pMTD demonstrated differences in sensory weighting, with evidence that attenuating somatosensory input facilitated better vocal motor adaptation. Framing pMTD within models of sensorimotor control advances our theoretical understanding of the disorder and highlights aberrant somatosensory processing as a potential mechanism underlying vocal instability. Future research is needed to further elucidate sensorimotor interactions and determine whether targeted recalibration of sensory feedback has therapeutic benefit.

原发性肌肉紧张性发声障碍的听觉-体感对发声运动控制的影响。
目的:听觉和体感系统共同支持发声运动控制,但它们在原发性肌肉紧张性发声障碍(pMTD)中的相对作用尚不清楚。本研究探讨了听觉和体感反馈如何影响有或没有pMTD的人的声带运动控制和适应。方法:58名参与者(pMTD: n = 17;对照组:n = 41)完成了一个200次试验的听觉反馈范式,包括持续的元音产生,基本频率在-100美分时向下移动。用雾化利多卡因重复这项任务,以短暂地减弱喉部体感输入。对数据进行分析,以提取声音调整在基线、斜坡、保持和后效阶段的幅度和方向。结果:声音健康的对照组在保持阶段对基频反馈改变表现出强大的适应性声音反应,随后在冲洗阶段出现适应性后效,特别是在体感完好的情况下。相比之下,当体感完整时,与对照组相比,pMTD患者在保持阶段表现出更大的相反方向的声音反应,在保持阶段不适应,并且总体上表现出更大的变异性。值得注意的是,在雾化利多卡因的pMTD保持阶段,体感觉中断稳定了适应。结论:pMTD患者表现出感觉权重的差异,有证据表明,减弱体感输入有助于更好的发声运动适应。在感觉运动控制模型中构建pMTD促进了我们对该疾病的理论理解,并强调了异常的体感处理作为声音不稳定的潜在机制。未来的研究需要进一步阐明感觉运动相互作用,并确定定向重新校准感觉反馈是否具有治疗益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书