Neck muscle motoneuron anatomy in woodpeckers: An exploration of morphological specializations linked to extreme beak behavior.

IF 2.1
Nicole M Moody, Stephen O Ogunbiyi, Nicole M Meléndez, Marc F Schmidt, Matthew J Fuxjager
{"title":"Neck muscle motoneuron anatomy in woodpeckers: An exploration of morphological specializations linked to extreme beak behavior.","authors":"Nicole M Moody, Stephen O Ogunbiyi, Nicole M Meléndez, Marc F Schmidt, Matthew J Fuxjager","doi":"10.1002/ar.70310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The avian head and neck often work together as a singular unit, where they act as a \"surrogate limb\" to accomplish a variety of ecologically important tasks. Functional diversity of this system can emerge through various anatomical specializations, though details of these specializations remain underexplored. Woodpeckers offer a prime example of unique head and neck behavior, as they drill and drum on hard woody surfaces to forage, excavate nests, and communicate. Here, we investigate neuroanatomical features of the neck that may relate to woodpeckers' highly specialized behavior. Assuming that specialized behavior can be associated with neuroanatomical modifications, we use retrograde tract-tracing to map spinal motoneuron characteristics in downy woodpeckers. We focus on two neck muscles that drive head protraction (longus colli ventralis, LCv) and retraction (longus colli dorsalis, LCd), and we compare motoneuron features for these muscles to those of the scapulohumeralis, a shoulder muscle that is not implicated in drumming. We also perform cross species comparisons with motoneurons in house sparrows, a similarly sized non-drumming bird. Our results show that motor pool size, density, and location for all three muscles tested are consistent between woodpeckers and sparrows. Yet, we find that motoneuron soma size varies by muscle, such that cells innervating neck muscles are smaller on average than those innervating the shoulder, regardless of species. We conclude that specializations for woodpecker drumming and drilling are not explained by simple neuroanatomical differences. Rather, adaptations for motor control of the woodpecker head and neck likely emerge at the physiological level.</p>","PeriodicalId":520555,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.70310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The avian head and neck often work together as a singular unit, where they act as a "surrogate limb" to accomplish a variety of ecologically important tasks. Functional diversity of this system can emerge through various anatomical specializations, though details of these specializations remain underexplored. Woodpeckers offer a prime example of unique head and neck behavior, as they drill and drum on hard woody surfaces to forage, excavate nests, and communicate. Here, we investigate neuroanatomical features of the neck that may relate to woodpeckers' highly specialized behavior. Assuming that specialized behavior can be associated with neuroanatomical modifications, we use retrograde tract-tracing to map spinal motoneuron characteristics in downy woodpeckers. We focus on two neck muscles that drive head protraction (longus colli ventralis, LCv) and retraction (longus colli dorsalis, LCd), and we compare motoneuron features for these muscles to those of the scapulohumeralis, a shoulder muscle that is not implicated in drumming. We also perform cross species comparisons with motoneurons in house sparrows, a similarly sized non-drumming bird. Our results show that motor pool size, density, and location for all three muscles tested are consistent between woodpeckers and sparrows. Yet, we find that motoneuron soma size varies by muscle, such that cells innervating neck muscles are smaller on average than those innervating the shoulder, regardless of species. We conclude that specializations for woodpecker drumming and drilling are not explained by simple neuroanatomical differences. Rather, adaptations for motor control of the woodpecker head and neck likely emerge at the physiological level.

啄木鸟颈部肌肉运动神经元解剖:与喙的极端行为有关的形态学特化的探索。
鸟类的头部和颈部经常作为一个单一的单位一起工作,在那里它们作为“代理肢体”来完成各种重要的生态任务。该系统的功能多样性可以通过各种解剖专门化出现,尽管这些专门化的细节仍未得到充分探讨。啄木鸟提供了一个独特的头部和颈部行为的主要例子,因为它们在坚硬的木质表面上钻和鼓来觅食,挖掘巢穴和交流。在这里,我们研究了颈部的神经解剖学特征,这些特征可能与啄木鸟高度专业化的行为有关。假设特殊行为可以与神经解剖学的改变相关联,我们使用逆行通道追踪来绘制绒毛啄木鸟的脊髓运动神经元特征。我们将重点放在两个驱动头部拉伸(颈腹长肌,LCv)和收缩(颈背长肌,LCd)的颈部肌肉上,并将这些肌肉的运动神经元特征与肩胛骨肱肌的运动神经元特征进行比较,肩胛骨肱肌是与击鼓无关的肩部肌肉。我们还对家麻雀的运动神经元进行了跨物种比较,家麻雀是一种同样大小的不打鼓的鸟类。我们的研究结果表明,三种肌肉的运动池大小、密度和位置在啄木鸟和麻雀之间是一致的。然而,我们发现运动神经元体的大小因肌肉而异,例如,无论物种如何,支配颈部肌肉的细胞平均比支配肩部肌肉的细胞小。我们的结论是,啄木鸟打鼓和钻孔的专业化不能用简单的神经解剖学差异来解释。相反,对啄木鸟头部和颈部运动控制的适应可能是在生理水平上出现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书