Key Predictors of Oral Health Service Utilization Among Working-Age Adults With and Without Depression in the United States.

IF 1.5
McKing Izeiza Amedari, Lisa J Heaton, Thomas Dobbs, Bernadette Grayson, Osayande Agbonlahor, Benjamin Walker
{"title":"Key Predictors of Oral Health Service Utilization Among Working-Age Adults With and Without Depression in the United States.","authors":"McKing Izeiza Amedari, Lisa J Heaton, Thomas Dobbs, Bernadette Grayson, Osayande Agbonlahor, Benjamin Walker","doi":"10.1111/jphd.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to determine the key factors that predict oral health care utilization among persons with and without depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 17,525 working-age adults from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed. Survey-weighted Poisson regression models estimated the population-level associations between sociodemographic factors (e.g., income, education, last medical visit) and a report of no past-year dental visit and Delayed Dental Care due to cost (DDC), while Random Forest (RF) permutation importance quantified each variable's contribution to predictive discrimination for individuals with or without depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted prevalence (aPR) of no past-year dental visit and DDC was greater among those with depression compared to those without depression (39.6% vs. 35.3% aPR = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06 to 1.18) and (26.6% vs. 17.8%, aPR = 1.47, 95% CI, 1.35, 1.59), respectively. Our RF models demonstrated an acceptable range of discrimination for both outcomes (AUC range: 0.67-0.73) across the subgroups by depression status. Income was the most important variable contributing most to all four models' discrimination, regardless of depression status, suggesting a cross-cutting impact on oral health service utilization regardless of depression status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with depression were less likely to visit the dentist and more likely to report cost-related delayed dental care than those without depression. Further, income was an important factor impacting oral health care-seeking behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":94108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.70077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to determine the key factors that predict oral health care utilization among persons with and without depression.

Methods: Data from 17,525 working-age adults from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed. Survey-weighted Poisson regression models estimated the population-level associations between sociodemographic factors (e.g., income, education, last medical visit) and a report of no past-year dental visit and Delayed Dental Care due to cost (DDC), while Random Forest (RF) permutation importance quantified each variable's contribution to predictive discrimination for individuals with or without depression.

Results: The adjusted prevalence (aPR) of no past-year dental visit and DDC was greater among those with depression compared to those without depression (39.6% vs. 35.3% aPR = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06 to 1.18) and (26.6% vs. 17.8%, aPR = 1.47, 95% CI, 1.35, 1.59), respectively. Our RF models demonstrated an acceptable range of discrimination for both outcomes (AUC range: 0.67-0.73) across the subgroups by depression status. Income was the most important variable contributing most to all four models' discrimination, regardless of depression status, suggesting a cross-cutting impact on oral health service utilization regardless of depression status.

Conclusion: Individuals with depression were less likely to visit the dentist and more likely to report cost-related delayed dental care than those without depression. Further, income was an important factor impacting oral health care-seeking behavior.

美国有或无抑郁症的工作年龄成年人口腔健康服务利用的关键预测因素
目的:探讨影响抑郁症患者和非抑郁症患者口腔保健利用的关键因素。方法:对来自2022年全国健康访谈调查的17525名工作年龄成年人的数据进行分析。调查加权泊松回归模型估计了社会人口因素(如收入、教育、最后一次就诊)与过去一年没有牙科就诊和因成本(DDC)而延迟牙科护理(DDC)的报告之间的人口水平关联,而随机森林(RF)排列重要性量化了每个变量对有或无抑郁症个体的预测性歧视的贡献。结果:抑郁症患者过去一年未看牙的调整患病率(aPR)和DDC均高于无抑郁症患者(39.6%比35.3% aPR = 1.12; 95%可信区间(CI) 1.06 ~ 1.18)和(26.6%比17.8%,aPR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.35, 1.59)。我们的RF模型显示,在抑郁状态的亚组中,两种结果的判别范围(AUC范围:0.67-0.73)都是可接受的。无论抑郁状况如何,收入是对所有四种模型的歧视贡献最大的最重要变量,这表明无论抑郁状况如何,收入对口腔卫生服务的利用都有交叉影响。结论:与没有抑郁症的人相比,抑郁症患者更不可能去看牙医,更有可能报告与费用相关的延迟牙科护理。此外,收入是影响口腔保健就诊行为的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书