Computational Identification of Potential HMG-CoA Reductase Modulators Through Drug Repurposing: Structural Insights and Therapeutic Implications.

IF 1.6
Qusay Abdulsattar Mohammed, Mohammed R Al-Shaheen
{"title":"Computational Identification of Potential HMG-CoA Reductase Modulators Through Drug Repurposing: Structural Insights and Therapeutic Implications.","authors":"Qusay Abdulsattar Mohammed, Mohammed R Al-Shaheen","doi":"10.2174/0115734099490379260809123720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) is a validated lipid-lowering target, but statin intolerance, variable response, and drug-drug interactions justify exploration of mechanistically distinct modulators. This study prioritized approved drugs that may bind predicted non-orthosteric HMGCR pockets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computational workflow combining homology modeling (SWISS-MODEL; GMQE = 0.95), CB-Dock pocket detection, AutoDock Vina docking, 100 ns all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (GROMACS 2023.2), MM/PBSA binding-free-energy estimation, and in silico ADMET screening was applied to Fluspirilene, Lenvatinib, Siponimod, and Lumacaftor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two putative non-orthosteric pockets were identified with calculated volumes of 394 Å3 (Pocket 1) and 305 Å3 (Pocket 2). Fluspirilene showed the most favorable Pocket 1 docking score (-9.4 kcal/mol) and MM/PBSA binding-free-energy estimate (-65.2 ± 3.8 kcal/mol), whereas Lumacaftor showed the most favorable Pocket 2 score (-8.9 kcal/mol; MM/PBSA: -55.7 ± 4.1 kcal/mol). MD trajectories supported retention of the selected poses throughout the 100 ns simulation window.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The predicted interactions involved hydrophobic contacts, π-associated interactions, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic contacts at sites spatially distinct from the canonical statin/HMG-CoA catalytic region. These findings support a non-orthosteric binding hypothesis but do not establish functional allosteric inhibition without enzyme kinetics, direct binding assays, and structural validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identifies computationally prioritized candidate scaffolds for putative non-orthosteric HMGCR modulation and defines the biochemical, kinetic, and structural validation required before any therapeutic interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93961,"journal":{"name":"Current computer-aided drug design","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current computer-aided drug design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734099490379260809123720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) is a validated lipid-lowering target, but statin intolerance, variable response, and drug-drug interactions justify exploration of mechanistically distinct modulators. This study prioritized approved drugs that may bind predicted non-orthosteric HMGCR pockets.

Methods: A computational workflow combining homology modeling (SWISS-MODEL; GMQE = 0.95), CB-Dock pocket detection, AutoDock Vina docking, 100 ns all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (GROMACS 2023.2), MM/PBSA binding-free-energy estimation, and in silico ADMET screening was applied to Fluspirilene, Lenvatinib, Siponimod, and Lumacaftor.

Results: Two putative non-orthosteric pockets were identified with calculated volumes of 394 Å3 (Pocket 1) and 305 Å3 (Pocket 2). Fluspirilene showed the most favorable Pocket 1 docking score (-9.4 kcal/mol) and MM/PBSA binding-free-energy estimate (-65.2 ± 3.8 kcal/mol), whereas Lumacaftor showed the most favorable Pocket 2 score (-8.9 kcal/mol; MM/PBSA: -55.7 ± 4.1 kcal/mol). MD trajectories supported retention of the selected poses throughout the 100 ns simulation window.

Discussion: The predicted interactions involved hydrophobic contacts, π-associated interactions, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic contacts at sites spatially distinct from the canonical statin/HMG-CoA catalytic region. These findings support a non-orthosteric binding hypothesis but do not establish functional allosteric inhibition without enzyme kinetics, direct binding assays, and structural validation.

Conclusion: The study identifies computationally prioritized candidate scaffolds for putative non-orthosteric HMGCR modulation and defines the biochemical, kinetic, and structural validation required before any therapeutic interpretation.

通过药物再利用计算鉴定潜在的HMG-CoA还原酶调节剂:结构见解和治疗意义。
简介:HMG-CoA还原酶(HMGCR)是一种有效的降脂靶点,但他汀类药物不耐受、可变反应和药物-药物相互作用证明了探索机制不同的调节剂的必要性。这项研究优先考虑了可能结合预测的非正畸HMGCR口袋的已批准药物。方法:采用同源性建模(SWISS-MODEL; GMQE = 0.95)、db - dock口袋检测、AutoDock Vina对接、100 ns全原子分子动力学(MD)模拟(GROMACS 2023.2)、MM/PBSA无结合能估计和硅ADMET筛选相结合的计算流程对Fluspirilene、Lenvatinib、Siponimod和Lumacaftor进行筛选。结果:确定了两个假定的非矫形袋,计算体积为394 Å3(口袋1)和305 Å3(口袋2)。Fluspirilene的Pocket 1对接评分为-9.4 kcal/mol, MM/PBSA的结合自由能评分为-65.2±3.8 kcal/mol,而Lumacaftor的Pocket 2评分为-8.9 kcal/mol, MM/PBSA的结合自由能评分为-55.7±4.1 kcal/mol。在整个100秒模拟窗口中,MD轨迹支持所选姿势的保留。讨论:预测的相互作用包括疏水接触、π相关相互作用、氢键和静电接触,这些接触在空间上与标准的他汀/HMG-CoA催化区域不同。这些发现支持非正构结合假说,但在没有酶动力学、直接结合试验和结构验证的情况下,不能建立功能性变构抑制。结论:该研究确定了计算优先的候选支架,用于推测的非正构HMGCR调节,并定义了在任何治疗解释之前所需的生化,动力学和结构验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书