Simon Effect and Conflict Adaptation in Unimanual Finger Press and Bimanual Tool-Mediated Responses.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-24 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2026.2719545
Fereidoun Malaei, Jamin Halberstadt
{"title":"Simon Effect and Conflict Adaptation in Unimanual Finger Press and Bimanual Tool-Mediated Responses.","authors":"Fereidoun Malaei, Jamin Halberstadt","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2026.2719545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two-handed tool use has long supported problem-solving in everyday life, yet its role in cognitive control remains poorly understood. This study investigated how response mode-unimanual finger presses versus coordinated two-handed stick use-affects cognitive performance in the Simon task, a classic measure of inhibitory control. Thirty-two participants completed the task by responding to the color of a stimulus while ignoring its spatial location, using both response modes in separate blocks. Analyses of reaction time and accuracy as a function of stimulus location (left, right) and response side (left, right) identified four distinct Simon effects and their corresponding conflict adaptation patterns across response modes. While the magnitude of the Simon effect was larger during stick use, sequential conflict adaptation-reflected in reduced interference following incongruent trials-was more pronounced for finger responses. No reliable practice-related changes in the Simon effect were observed across blocks for either effector. Delta plot analyses further revealed effector-specific differences in the temporal dynamics of spatial conflict across the RT distribution. By comparing unimanual and bimanual response modes across multiple interference types, this study highlights distinct contributions of motor implementation to cognitive control and supports the value of more ecologically valid action-based paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"647-662"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2026.2719545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two-handed tool use has long supported problem-solving in everyday life, yet its role in cognitive control remains poorly understood. This study investigated how response mode-unimanual finger presses versus coordinated two-handed stick use-affects cognitive performance in the Simon task, a classic measure of inhibitory control. Thirty-two participants completed the task by responding to the color of a stimulus while ignoring its spatial location, using both response modes in separate blocks. Analyses of reaction time and accuracy as a function of stimulus location (left, right) and response side (left, right) identified four distinct Simon effects and their corresponding conflict adaptation patterns across response modes. While the magnitude of the Simon effect was larger during stick use, sequential conflict adaptation-reflected in reduced interference following incongruent trials-was more pronounced for finger responses. No reliable practice-related changes in the Simon effect were observed across blocks for either effector. Delta plot analyses further revealed effector-specific differences in the temporal dynamics of spatial conflict across the RT distribution. By comparing unimanual and bimanual response modes across multiple interference types, this study highlights distinct contributions of motor implementation to cognitive control and supports the value of more ecologically valid action-based paradigms.

单手手指按压和双手工具介导反应中的Simon效应和冲突适应。
长期以来,双手工具的使用一直有助于解决日常生活中的问题,但其在认知控制中的作用仍鲜为人知。本研究调查了反应模式——单手手指按压与协调的双手操纵杆使用——如何影响西蒙任务中的认知表现,这是抑制控制的一个经典测量。32名参与者通过对刺激的颜色做出反应而忽略其空间位置来完成任务,在不同的块中使用两种反应模式。通过分析刺激位置(左、右)和反应侧(左、右)对反应时间和准确度的影响,确定了四种不同的Simon效应及其相应的反应模式冲突适应模式。虽然西蒙效应的强度在使用棍子时更大,但顺序冲突适应——反映在不一致试验后的干扰减少——在手指反应中更为明显。没有可靠的实践相关的变化,观察到西蒙效应跨块。Delta图分析进一步揭示了在整个RT分布中空间冲突的时间动态中,效应者特有的差异。通过比较多种干扰类型的单手和双手反应模式,本研究强调了运动执行对认知控制的独特贡献,并支持了更生态有效的基于行动的范式的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书