Michael Bewernitz PhD, Anantha Ram Nookala PhD, Gopichand Gottipati PhD FCP, Praveen Balimane PhD, Venkateswaran C. Pillai PhD, Jeffry Florian PhD, Adarsh Gandhi PhD, Kevin Krudys PhD, David Lee PhD, Dawei Li PhD, Min Li PhD, Zhihua Li PhD, Jie Liu PhD, Rajanikanth Madabushi PhD, Grimstein Manuela PhD, Mehul Mehta PhD, Srikanth C. Nallani PhD, Nimishraj Panse PhD, Wei Qiu PhD, Sreedharan Sabarinath PhD FCP, Vishnu Sharma PhD, Li Tan PhD, Ramana Uppoor PhD, Yun Xu PhD, Hao Zhu PhD, Venkatesh Atul Bhattaram PhD
{"title":"Application of Model-Informed Approaches in Neuroscience Drug Development and Regulatory Decision-Making","authors":"Michael Bewernitz PhD, Anantha Ram Nookala PhD, Gopichand Gottipati PhD FCP, Praveen Balimane PhD, Venkateswaran C. Pillai PhD, Jeffry Florian PhD, Adarsh Gandhi PhD, Kevin Krudys PhD, David Lee PhD, Dawei Li PhD, Min Li PhD, Zhihua Li PhD, Jie Liu PhD, Rajanikanth Madabushi PhD, Grimstein Manuela PhD, Mehul Mehta PhD, Srikanth C. Nallani PhD, Nimishraj Panse PhD, Wei Qiu PhD, Sreedharan Sabarinath PhD FCP, Vishnu Sharma PhD, Li Tan PhD, Ramana Uppoor PhD, Yun Xu PhD, Hao Zhu PhD, Venkatesh Atul Bhattaram PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches are being increasingly used in neuroscience drug development programs and regulatory decision-making. In this work, the authors summarize a select set of cases in neurology, psychiatry, addiction, anesthesia, and analgesia, where MIDD approaches were utilized to address critical drug development questions or fill knowledge gaps. These examples include efficacy considerations such as biomarker-clinical endpoint relationships, surrogate endpoints for accelerated approval, extrapolation of efficacy, and safety aspects such as informing driving studies. Additionally, the examples also inform optimal dosing regimen selection, dose adjustments in drug interactions, life cycle management decisions such as indication expansion, formulation switching, and informing patient population selection. Together, these examples offer insights into the utility of MIDD approaches to streamline drug development and opportunities to save costs and resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"66 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.70272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches are being increasingly used in neuroscience drug development programs and regulatory decision-making. In this work, the authors summarize a select set of cases in neurology, psychiatry, addiction, anesthesia, and analgesia, where MIDD approaches were utilized to address critical drug development questions or fill knowledge gaps. These examples include efficacy considerations such as biomarker-clinical endpoint relationships, surrogate endpoints for accelerated approval, extrapolation of efficacy, and safety aspects such as informing driving studies. Additionally, the examples also inform optimal dosing regimen selection, dose adjustments in drug interactions, life cycle management decisions such as indication expansion, formulation switching, and informing patient population selection. Together, these examples offer insights into the utility of MIDD approaches to streamline drug development and opportunities to save costs and resources.