Application of Model-Informed Approaches in Neuroscience Drug Development and Regulatory Decision-Making

Michael Bewernitz PhD, Anantha Ram Nookala PhD, Gopichand Gottipati PhD FCP, Praveen Balimane PhD, Venkateswaran C. Pillai PhD, Jeffry Florian PhD, Adarsh Gandhi PhD, Kevin Krudys PhD, David Lee PhD, Dawei Li PhD, Min Li PhD, Zhihua Li PhD, Jie Liu PhD, Rajanikanth Madabushi PhD, Grimstein Manuela PhD, Mehul Mehta PhD, Srikanth C. Nallani PhD, Nimishraj Panse PhD, Wei Qiu PhD, Sreedharan Sabarinath PhD FCP, Vishnu Sharma PhD, Li Tan PhD, Ramana Uppoor PhD, Yun Xu PhD, Hao Zhu PhD, Venkatesh Atul Bhattaram PhD
{"title":"Application of Model-Informed Approaches in Neuroscience Drug Development and Regulatory Decision-Making","authors":"Michael Bewernitz PhD,&nbsp;Anantha Ram Nookala PhD,&nbsp;Gopichand Gottipati PhD FCP,&nbsp;Praveen Balimane PhD,&nbsp;Venkateswaran C. Pillai PhD,&nbsp;Jeffry Florian PhD,&nbsp;Adarsh Gandhi PhD,&nbsp;Kevin Krudys PhD,&nbsp;David Lee PhD,&nbsp;Dawei Li PhD,&nbsp;Min Li PhD,&nbsp;Zhihua Li PhD,&nbsp;Jie Liu PhD,&nbsp;Rajanikanth Madabushi PhD,&nbsp;Grimstein Manuela PhD,&nbsp;Mehul Mehta PhD,&nbsp;Srikanth C. Nallani PhD,&nbsp;Nimishraj Panse PhD,&nbsp;Wei Qiu PhD,&nbsp;Sreedharan Sabarinath PhD FCP,&nbsp;Vishnu Sharma PhD,&nbsp;Li Tan PhD,&nbsp;Ramana Uppoor PhD,&nbsp;Yun Xu PhD,&nbsp;Hao Zhu PhD,&nbsp;Venkatesh Atul Bhattaram PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches are being increasingly used in neuroscience drug development programs and regulatory decision-making. In this work, the authors summarize a select set of cases in neurology, psychiatry, addiction, anesthesia, and analgesia, where MIDD approaches were utilized to address critical drug development questions or fill knowledge gaps. These examples include efficacy considerations such as biomarker-clinical endpoint relationships, surrogate endpoints for accelerated approval, extrapolation of efficacy, and safety aspects such as informing driving studies. Additionally, the examples also inform optimal dosing regimen selection, dose adjustments in drug interactions, life cycle management decisions such as indication expansion, formulation switching, and informing patient population selection. Together, these examples offer insights into the utility of MIDD approaches to streamline drug development and opportunities to save costs and resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"66 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.70272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches are being increasingly used in neuroscience drug development programs and regulatory decision-making. In this work, the authors summarize a select set of cases in neurology, psychiatry, addiction, anesthesia, and analgesia, where MIDD approaches were utilized to address critical drug development questions or fill knowledge gaps. These examples include efficacy considerations such as biomarker-clinical endpoint relationships, surrogate endpoints for accelerated approval, extrapolation of efficacy, and safety aspects such as informing driving studies. Additionally, the examples also inform optimal dosing regimen selection, dose adjustments in drug interactions, life cycle management decisions such as indication expansion, formulation switching, and informing patient population selection. Together, these examples offer insights into the utility of MIDD approaches to streamline drug development and opportunities to save costs and resources.

模型信息方法在神经科学药物开发和监管决策中的应用。
基于模型的药物开发(MIDD)方法越来越多地应用于神经科学药物开发项目和监管决策。在这项工作中,作者总结了神经病学、精神病学、成瘾、麻醉和镇痛等领域的一组精选病例,在这些领域,MIDD方法被用于解决关键的药物开发问题或填补知识空白。这些例子包括疗效考虑因素,如生物标志物-临床终点关系、加速审批的替代终点、疗效推断和安全性方面,如为驾驶研究提供信息。此外,这些例子还为最佳给药方案的选择、药物相互作用中的剂量调整、生命周期管理决策(如适应证扩大、配方转换)提供信息,并为患者群体的选择提供信息。总之,这些例子提供了对MIDD方法在简化药物开发方面的效用以及节省成本和资源的机会的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书