Sean D Kampel, Garnett P McMillan, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo, Naomi F Bramhall
{"title":"Normative Ranges for Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude: A Potential Diagnostic Indicator of Cochlear Deafferentation.","authors":"Sean D Kampel, Garnett P McMillan, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo, Naomi F Bramhall","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for cochlear deafferentation and then compare a population at high risk for deafferentation to the normative ranges.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for outer hair cell dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level 8-kHz toneburst.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1088-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: While cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for cochlear deafferentation and then compare a population at high risk for deafferentation to the normative ranges.
Method: The low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample.
Results: While the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for outer hair cell dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level 8-kHz toneburst.
Conclusion: In patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.