Normative Ranges for Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude: A Potential Diagnostic Indicator of Cochlear Deafferentation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2026-09-03 Epub Date: 2026-08-24 DOI:10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00296
Sean D Kampel, Garnett P McMillan, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo, Naomi F Bramhall
{"title":"Normative Ranges for Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude: A Potential Diagnostic Indicator of Cochlear Deafferentation.","authors":"Sean D Kampel, Garnett P McMillan, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo, Naomi F Bramhall","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for cochlear deafferentation and then compare a population at high risk for deafferentation to the normative ranges.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for outer hair cell dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level 8-kHz toneburst.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1088-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for cochlear deafferentation and then compare a population at high risk for deafferentation to the normative ranges.

Method: The low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample.

Results: While the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for outer hair cell dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level 8-kHz toneburst.

Conclusion: In patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.

听觉脑干反应波I振幅的标准范围:耳蜗传入障碍的潜在诊断指标。
目的:虽然耳蜗突触病对听觉阈值的影响有限,但越来越多的证据表明耳蜗传入障碍与听觉知觉缺陷有关。然而,目前还没有办法诊断个体患者的突触病或神经分化。本研究的目的是建立听觉脑干反应(ABR)波I振幅的规范范围,这是一种对动物突触病敏感的测量方法,在耳蜗传入低风险人群中,然后将传入高风险人群与规范范围进行比较。方法:低风险样本由169名非退伍军人青年组成,他们听力正常,自我报告的噪音暴露史最少,没有听觉抱怨(耳鸣,声音耐受性下降,或噪音困难时的言语感知)。ABR波I振幅标准范围为2、4和8 kHz音爆产生,并根据性别和平均失真产品耳声发射(DPOAE)水平进行统计调整。91名听音正常且至少有一种听觉抱怨的退伍军人被纳入高危比较样本。结果:虽然dpoae调整的ABR标准范围在区分低风险和高风险样本方面是有效的,但结果也表明,调整外毛细胞功能障碍的ABR标准范围可能没有必要,而且可能存在问题。仅根据性别调整的ABR标准范围能够区分低风险样本和高风险样本,51%的高风险样本低于105 dB峰值等效声压级8 khz音爆的标准范围。结论:在听音正常的患者中,临床医生可根据ABR波I的性别特异性振幅标准范围来鉴别耳蜗高度脱音患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书