Reassessment of Species Boundaries in the Fusarium oxysporum Species Complex: Insights from Korean Isolates Using Multilocus Phylogenetics, GCPSR, and Coalescent-Based Approaches.

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Pathology Journal Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-24 DOI:10.5423/PPJ.OA.06.2026.0084
Le Dinh Thao, Yunhee Choi, Jae Sung Lee, Anbazhagan Mageswari, Daseul Lee, Donghun Kang, In-Young Choi, Seung-Beom Hong
{"title":"Reassessment of Species Boundaries in the Fusarium oxysporum Species Complex: Insights from Korean Isolates Using Multilocus Phylogenetics, GCPSR, and Coalescent-Based Approaches.","authors":"Le Dinh Thao, Yunhee Choi, Jae Sung Lee, Anbazhagan Mageswari, Daseul Lee, Donghun Kang, In-Young Choi, Seung-Beom Hong","doi":"10.5423/PPJ.OA.06.2026.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC) comprises globally distributed fungi exhibiting diverse ecological lifestyles, including plant pathogenic, endophytic, saprotrophic, and opportunistic associations. However, species boundaries within the complex remain controversial due to limited genetic divergence, morphological similarity, and incongruence among gene genealogies. In this study, species diversity and evolutionary relationships within the FOSC were reassessed using multilocus phylogenetic analyses, the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) concept, and multispecies coalescent-based species delimitation approaches (STACEY and BPP) based on five loci (tef1, rpb1, rpb2, CaM, and tub2). The concatenated multilocus phylogeny formed the primary basis for recognizing 32 phylogenetic species among 49 previously described taxa, representing the species boundaries adopted in this study. Additional GCPSR and multispecies coalescent analyses provided further insight into the relationships among these phylogenetic species and supported the proposal of an 18-lineage scenario as a set of putative evolutionary lineages. However, these putative evolutionary lineages require further taxonomic evaluation before formal taxonomic changes can be proposed. Among the 92 Korean isolates examined, 11 species were identified, including nine species newly recorded in Korea. Of these, F. cugenangense was the most frequently recovered species and exhibited the broadest host/substrate associations. This study improves our understanding of species boundaries and evolutionary relationships within the FOSC while expanding current knowledge of species diversity and host/substrate associations in Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":20173,"journal":{"name":"Plant Pathology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"617-644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Pathology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.06.2026.0084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC) comprises globally distributed fungi exhibiting diverse ecological lifestyles, including plant pathogenic, endophytic, saprotrophic, and opportunistic associations. However, species boundaries within the complex remain controversial due to limited genetic divergence, morphological similarity, and incongruence among gene genealogies. In this study, species diversity and evolutionary relationships within the FOSC were reassessed using multilocus phylogenetic analyses, the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) concept, and multispecies coalescent-based species delimitation approaches (STACEY and BPP) based on five loci (tef1, rpb1, rpb2, CaM, and tub2). The concatenated multilocus phylogeny formed the primary basis for recognizing 32 phylogenetic species among 49 previously described taxa, representing the species boundaries adopted in this study. Additional GCPSR and multispecies coalescent analyses provided further insight into the relationships among these phylogenetic species and supported the proposal of an 18-lineage scenario as a set of putative evolutionary lineages. However, these putative evolutionary lineages require further taxonomic evaluation before formal taxonomic changes can be proposed. Among the 92 Korean isolates examined, 11 species were identified, including nine species newly recorded in Korea. Of these, F. cugenangense was the most frequently recovered species and exhibited the broadest host/substrate associations. This study improves our understanding of species boundaries and evolutionary relationships within the FOSC while expanding current knowledge of species diversity and host/substrate associations in Korea.

尖孢镰刀菌物种复合体的物种边界重新评估:利用多位点系统发育、GCPSR和基于聚结的方法从韩国分离株中获得的见解。
尖孢镰刀菌物种复合体(Fusarium oxysporum species complex, FOSC)由全球分布的真菌组成,表现出不同的生态生活方式,包括植物病原性、内生性、腐养性和机会性关联。然而,由于有限的遗传差异、形态相似性和基因谱系之间的不一致,复合体内的物种边界仍然存在争议。本研究利用多位点系统发育分析、谱系一致性系统发育物种识别(GCPSR)概念和基于tef1、rpb1、rpb2、CaM和tub2 5个位点的多物种聚类划分方法(STACEY和BPP),对FOSC内的物种多样性和进化关系进行了重新评估。串联的多位点系统发育构成了识别49个分类群中32个系统发育种的主要依据,代表了本研究采用的物种边界。额外的GCPSR和多物种聚结分析进一步深入了解了这些系统发育物种之间的关系,并支持了18个谱系情景作为一组假定的进化谱系的提议。然而,在提出正式的分类变化之前,这些假定的进化谱系需要进一步的分类评估。在92株韩国分离株中,鉴定出11种,其中9种为国内新记录。其中cugenangense是恢复频率最高的物种,表现出最广泛的寄主/底物关联。本研究提高了我们对FOSC内物种边界和进化关系的理解,同时扩展了目前对韩国物种多样性和宿主/底物关联的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Pathology Journal
Plant Pathology Journal 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书