Clinical Boundaries of Trauma: A Conceptual Framework for Navigating Comorbidity and Diagnostic Overlap in PTSD.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-24 DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000001885
Maayan Abargil, Dori Rubinstein, Alec Lerner, Erin Basol, Joliza Maynard, Tetiana Davydovska, Ilan Harpaz-Rotem
{"title":"Clinical Boundaries of Trauma: A Conceptual Framework for Navigating Comorbidity and Diagnostic Overlap in PTSD.","authors":"Maayan Abargil, Dori Rubinstein, Alec Lerner, Erin Basol, Joliza Maynard, Tetiana Davydovska, Ilan Harpaz-Rotem","doi":"10.1097/NMD.0000000000001885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) rarely occurs in isolation; over 80% of individuals present with comorbid conditions such as depression, anxiety, or substance use disorders. The polythetic DSM-5 structure creates substantial diagnostic heterogeneity, producing thousands of possible symptom combinations. This theoretical paper seeks to demonstrate how trauma-related symptoms transcend diagnostic categories and proposes a mechanism-based framework for improving differential diagnosis and treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We review symptom overlap between PTSD and major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, prolonged grief disorder, and moral injury, highlighting discrepancies between DSM-5 and ICD-11 conceptualizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate that trauma-related presentations reflect multidimensional suffering involving depression, dissociation, affective dysregulation, identity disturbance, grief, and moral distress. We propose a conceptual, mechanism-based framework organized around four response profiles, fear-based, grief-dominant, dissociative, and moral-injury patterns, that may capture underlying mechanisms more effectively than categorical diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A mechanism-based approach may refine diagnostic clarity, enhance treatment precision, and better integrate the psychological and somatic dimensions of trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":16480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","volume":" ","pages":"124-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) rarely occurs in isolation; over 80% of individuals present with comorbid conditions such as depression, anxiety, or substance use disorders. The polythetic DSM-5 structure creates substantial diagnostic heterogeneity, producing thousands of possible symptom combinations. This theoretical paper seeks to demonstrate how trauma-related symptoms transcend diagnostic categories and proposes a mechanism-based framework for improving differential diagnosis and treatment planning.

Methods: We review symptom overlap between PTSD and major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, prolonged grief disorder, and moral injury, highlighting discrepancies between DSM-5 and ICD-11 conceptualizations.

Results: We demonstrate that trauma-related presentations reflect multidimensional suffering involving depression, dissociation, affective dysregulation, identity disturbance, grief, and moral distress. We propose a conceptual, mechanism-based framework organized around four response profiles, fear-based, grief-dominant, dissociative, and moral-injury patterns, that may capture underlying mechanisms more effectively than categorical diagnoses.

Conclusions: A mechanism-based approach may refine diagnostic clarity, enhance treatment precision, and better integrate the psychological and somatic dimensions of trauma.

创伤的临床边界:导航PTSD共病和诊断重叠的概念框架。
目的:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)很少孤立发生;超过80%的个体存在合并症,如抑郁、焦虑或物质使用障碍。DSM-5的合成结构产生了大量的诊断异质性,产生了数千种可能的症状组合。这篇理论论文试图证明创伤相关症状如何超越诊断类别,并提出一个基于机制的框架,以改善鉴别诊断和治疗计划。方法:回顾PTSD与重性抑郁障碍、边缘型人格障碍、长期悲伤障碍和道德伤害的症状重叠,强调DSM-5和ICD-11概念上的差异。结果:我们证明了创伤相关的表现反映了包括抑郁、分离、情感失调、身份障碍、悲伤和道德困扰在内的多维痛苦。我们提出了一个概念性的、基于机制的框架,围绕四种反应模式,即基于恐惧的、悲伤主导的、分离的和道德伤害的模式,这可能比分类诊断更有效地捕捉潜在的机制。结论:基于机制的方法可以提高诊断清晰度,提高治疗精度,更好地整合创伤的心理和躯体维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease publishes peer-reviewed articles containing new data or ways of reorganizing established knowledge relevant to understanding and modifying human behavior, especially that defined as impaired or diseased, and the context, applications and effects of that knowledge. Our policy is summarized by the slogan, "Behavioral science for clinical practice." We consider articles that include at least one behavioral variable, clear definition of study populations, and replicable research designs. Authors should use the active voice and first person whenever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书