Protective Effect of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical-Site Infection in High-Risk Open Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Nomogram Development

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Fen Zhou, Yuhao Zhang, Ping Yu, Xia Feng, Yiling Yang, Ling Ding, Dadeng Dong
{"title":"Protective Effect of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical-Site Infection in High-Risk Open Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Nomogram Development","authors":"Fen Zhou,&nbsp;Yuhao Zhang,&nbsp;Ping Yu,&nbsp;Xia Feng,&nbsp;Yiling Yang,&nbsp;Ling Ding,&nbsp;Dadeng Dong","doi":"10.1111/iwj.71007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a major complication after open abdominal surgery, especially in high-risk patients (obesity, diabetes, immunosuppression). Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) may reduce SSIs. This study evaluated pNPWT versus standard dressings and developed an SSI risk prediction nomogram. A single-centre retrospective study included 83 high-risk adults undergoing open abdominal surgery (2022–2024). Patients received pNPWT (<i>n</i> = 38, −125 mmHg for 5–7 days) or standard dressing (<i>n</i> = 45). Primary outcome: CDC-classified SSI within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included wound dehiscence, epithelialisation time, hospital stay, 30-day readmission and 3-month scar quality. Multivariate logistic regression identified SSI predictors; a nomogram was built and assessed (discrimination: AUC, calibration: bootstrap, utility: decision curve). SSI incidence was significantly lower with pNPWT (5.3% vs. 35.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Compared with standard dressings, pNPWT shortened time to complete epithelialization (10.2 [8.90–11.4] vs. 14.5 [12.3–17.7] days; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and reduced postoperative length of stay (10.3 [8.88–12.2] vs. 13.4 [10.5–17.4] days; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In multivariable analysis, pNPWT was independently protective (adjusted OR: 0.030, 95% CI: 0.001–0.298; <i>p</i> = 0.011), while higher BMI (adjusted OR: 1.476; <i>p</i> = 0.013), higher HbA1c (adjusted OR: 3.726; <i>p</i> = 0.016) and longer incision length (adjusted OR: 1.441; <i>p</i> = 0.016) were associated with increased SSI risk. pNPWT significantly reduces SSIs and improves wound healing in high-risk open abdominal surgery. The developed nomogram accurately predicts individual SSI risk, aiding personalised prophylaxis. Prospective multi-centre RCTs with economic evaluations are needed to confirm findings and guide practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13501097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.71007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a major complication after open abdominal surgery, especially in high-risk patients (obesity, diabetes, immunosuppression). Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) may reduce SSIs. This study evaluated pNPWT versus standard dressings and developed an SSI risk prediction nomogram. A single-centre retrospective study included 83 high-risk adults undergoing open abdominal surgery (2022–2024). Patients received pNPWT (n = 38, −125 mmHg for 5–7 days) or standard dressing (n = 45). Primary outcome: CDC-classified SSI within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included wound dehiscence, epithelialisation time, hospital stay, 30-day readmission and 3-month scar quality. Multivariate logistic regression identified SSI predictors; a nomogram was built and assessed (discrimination: AUC, calibration: bootstrap, utility: decision curve). SSI incidence was significantly lower with pNPWT (5.3% vs. 35.6%; p = 0.002). Compared with standard dressings, pNPWT shortened time to complete epithelialization (10.2 [8.90–11.4] vs. 14.5 [12.3–17.7] days; p < 0.001) and reduced postoperative length of stay (10.3 [8.88–12.2] vs. 13.4 [10.5–17.4] days; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, pNPWT was independently protective (adjusted OR: 0.030, 95% CI: 0.001–0.298; p = 0.011), while higher BMI (adjusted OR: 1.476; p = 0.013), higher HbA1c (adjusted OR: 3.726; p = 0.016) and longer incision length (adjusted OR: 1.441; p = 0.016) were associated with increased SSI risk. pNPWT significantly reduces SSIs and improves wound healing in high-risk open abdominal surgery. The developed nomogram accurately predicts individual SSI risk, aiding personalised prophylaxis. Prospective multi-centre RCTs with economic evaluations are needed to confirm findings and guide practice.

预防性负压伤口治疗对高危腹部开放手术手术部位感染的保护作用:回顾性队列研究和Nomogram发展。
手术部位感染(ssi)是腹直视手术后的主要并发症,特别是在高危患者(肥胖、糖尿病、免疫抑制)中。预防性负压伤口治疗(pNPWT)可以减少伤口感染。本研究评估了pNPWT与标准敷料的对比,并制定了SSI风险预测图。一项单中心回顾性研究纳入了83名接受开放腹部手术的高危成年人(2022-2024)。患者接受pNPWT (n = 38, -125 mmHg, 5-7天)或标准敷料(n = 45)。主要结局:30天内cdc分级SSI。次要结局包括伤口裂开、上皮化时间、住院时间、30天再入院和3个月疤痕质量。多元逻辑回归确定SSI预测因子;建立并评估nomogram(判别:AUC,校准:bootstrap,效用:决策曲线)。pNPWT组SSI发生率显著降低(5.3% vs. 35.6%; p = 0.002)。与标准敷料相比,pNPWT缩短了完成上皮化的时间(10.2 [8.90-11.4]vs. 14.5[12.3-17.7]天
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书