Palatal Donor-Site Healing and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Chitosan and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin-Enriched Chitosan Application Compared with Gelatine Sponge: A Three-Arm Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Ayse Ege Selman, Bahar Alkaya, Burcu Karaduman, Mustafa Ozcan, Mehmet Cenk Haytac
{"title":"Palatal Donor-Site Healing and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Chitosan and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin-Enriched Chitosan Application Compared with Gelatine Sponge: A Three-Arm Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial","authors":"Ayse Ege Selman, Bahar Alkaya, Burcu Karaduman, Mustafa Ozcan, Mehmet Cenk Haytac","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of palatal donor-site healing following the use of an absorbable gelatine sponge, a chitosan sponge or an injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF)-enriched chitosan sponge after free gingival graft harvesting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this three-arm randomised controlled clinical study, a total of 68 patients were allocated to three groups: i-PRF + chitosan (<i>n</i> = 22), chitosan (<i>n</i> = 23) and gelatine sponge (control; <i>n</i> = 23). The primary outcome was the palatal early healing index (PEHI). Secondary outcomes included PROMs, namely postoperative pain, burning sensation and changes in dietary habits, which were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative days 7, 14, 28 and 56. Bleeding and painkiller consumption were recorded daily. Colour match was assessed using VAS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both chitosan-containing groups showed significantly higher PEHI scores, particularly on days 14 and 28, than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At Day 14, the median PEHI scores were 8.0 (Q1–Q3: 7.0–8.0; 95% CI for the median: 7.0–8.0), 8.0 (Q1–Q3: 8.0–9.0; 95% CI: 8.0–9.0) and 9.0 (Q1–Q3:8.0–9.0; 95% CI: 8.0–9.0) in the control, chitosan and i-PRF-enriched chitosan groups, respectively. The i-PRF + chitosan group showed significantly lower pain and burning sensation during early healing and less changes on dietary habits on days 3 and 7 compared with the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Bleeding and painkiller consumption were similar among groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Both test groups showed significantly better colour match than the control group at days 14, 28 and 56 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Within the limitations of the present study, chitosan improved early palatal wound healing, while the addition of i-PRF enhanced patient comfort. Both chitosan-containing approaches resulted in improved colour match compared with control. Nevertheless, further studies incorporating histological and biomolecular assessments of wound healing are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"53 11","pages":"1702-1711"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcpe.70194","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.70194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of palatal donor-site healing following the use of an absorbable gelatine sponge, a chitosan sponge or an injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF)-enriched chitosan sponge after free gingival graft harvesting.
Materials and Methods
In this three-arm randomised controlled clinical study, a total of 68 patients were allocated to three groups: i-PRF + chitosan (n = 22), chitosan (n = 23) and gelatine sponge (control; n = 23). The primary outcome was the palatal early healing index (PEHI). Secondary outcomes included PROMs, namely postoperative pain, burning sensation and changes in dietary habits, which were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative days 7, 14, 28 and 56. Bleeding and painkiller consumption were recorded daily. Colour match was assessed using VAS.
Results
Both chitosan-containing groups showed significantly higher PEHI scores, particularly on days 14 and 28, than the control group (p < 0.001). At Day 14, the median PEHI scores were 8.0 (Q1–Q3: 7.0–8.0; 95% CI for the median: 7.0–8.0), 8.0 (Q1–Q3: 8.0–9.0; 95% CI: 8.0–9.0) and 9.0 (Q1–Q3:8.0–9.0; 95% CI: 8.0–9.0) in the control, chitosan and i-PRF-enriched chitosan groups, respectively. The i-PRF + chitosan group showed significantly lower pain and burning sensation during early healing and less changes on dietary habits on days 3 and 7 compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Bleeding and painkiller consumption were similar among groups (p > 0.05). Both test groups showed significantly better colour match than the control group at days 14, 28 and 56 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Within the limitations of the present study, chitosan improved early palatal wound healing, while the addition of i-PRF enhanced patient comfort. Both chitosan-containing approaches resulted in improved colour match compared with control. Nevertheless, further studies incorporating histological and biomolecular assessments of wound healing are needed to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.