Multicenter Evaluation of Noise Levels and Staff Perceptions Across Laser Technologies During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Prostate Enucleation Collaborative Initiative.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-24 DOI:10.1002/lsm.70197
Jessica Wu, Amanda E Kahn, Benjamin Dalkin, Satvik Kuravi, Adam Cohen, Charles Klose, Eric Qualkenbush, Bryce Baird, Karen L Stern, Smita De, Dane Klett, Rajat Jain, Scott O Quarrier, Chandler D Dora
{"title":"Multicenter Evaluation of Noise Levels and Staff Perceptions Across Laser Technologies During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Prostate Enucleation Collaborative Initiative.","authors":"Jessica Wu, Amanda E Kahn, Benjamin Dalkin, Satvik Kuravi, Adam Cohen, Charles Klose, Eric Qualkenbush, Bryce Baird, Karen L Stern, Smita De, Dane Klett, Rajat Jain, Scott O Quarrier, Chandler D Dora","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Operating room (OR) noise during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), particularly from laser activation, may impair surgical workflow and staff performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>84 HoLEP procedures were recorded at three academic institutions between June 2024 and January 2026. Laser platforms included Lumenis Moses 2.0, Quanta Litho 150, Quanta Magneto, and Dornier Thulio. Sound measurements were obtained using a standardized smartphone-based system during three phases: laser-off (baseline), idle (not firing), and active lasing. Acoustic metrics included average sound level (LAeq), peak sound level (Lcpeak), and sound levels exceeded for 10%, 50%, and 90% of the recording time (L10, L50, and L90). Background noise correction was performed using baseline measurements to account for ambient noise and isolate laser-related sound. OR staff completed a validated survey assessing perceived noise burden (0-10 scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Background-corrected noise during active lasing differed significantly by platform. Litho demonstrated lower mean noise levels compared to Thulio for LAeq (60.6 vs. 68.2 dB, p = 0.023) and L10 (61.5 vs. 70.6 dB, p = 0.023), while Moses had higher LAeq compared to Litho (63.1 vs. 60.6 dB, p = 0.043). Overall, Litho had the lowest noise levels, whereas Thulio had the highest. Survey responses paralleled these findings. Litho was associated with lower perceived overall effort (2.1 ± 0.9), while Moses demonstrated higher overall effort (3.6 ± 1.2) for communication and concentration (Figure 2). Significant pairwise differences were observed between Moses and Litho (all p < 0.05). Trends were consistent across sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Noise levels during HoLEP varied by laser technology and correlated with differences in perceived communication and cognitive effort. Litho demonstrated the lowest acoustic burden, while Moses and Thulio had higher noise exposure. These findings highlight the impact of laser selection on the OR environment and intraoperative team performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"877-884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Operating room (OR) noise during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), particularly from laser activation, may impair surgical workflow and staff performance.

Methods: 84 HoLEP procedures were recorded at three academic institutions between June 2024 and January 2026. Laser platforms included Lumenis Moses 2.0, Quanta Litho 150, Quanta Magneto, and Dornier Thulio. Sound measurements were obtained using a standardized smartphone-based system during three phases: laser-off (baseline), idle (not firing), and active lasing. Acoustic metrics included average sound level (LAeq), peak sound level (Lcpeak), and sound levels exceeded for 10%, 50%, and 90% of the recording time (L10, L50, and L90). Background noise correction was performed using baseline measurements to account for ambient noise and isolate laser-related sound. OR staff completed a validated survey assessing perceived noise burden (0-10 scale).

Results: Background-corrected noise during active lasing differed significantly by platform. Litho demonstrated lower mean noise levels compared to Thulio for LAeq (60.6 vs. 68.2 dB, p = 0.023) and L10 (61.5 vs. 70.6 dB, p = 0.023), while Moses had higher LAeq compared to Litho (63.1 vs. 60.6 dB, p = 0.043). Overall, Litho had the lowest noise levels, whereas Thulio had the highest. Survey responses paralleled these findings. Litho was associated with lower perceived overall effort (2.1 ± 0.9), while Moses demonstrated higher overall effort (3.6 ± 1.2) for communication and concentration (Figure 2). Significant pairwise differences were observed between Moses and Litho (all p < 0.05). Trends were consistent across sites.

Conclusions: Noise levels during HoLEP varied by laser technology and correlated with differences in perceived communication and cognitive effort. Litho demonstrated the lowest acoustic burden, while Moses and Thulio had higher noise exposure. These findings highlight the impact of laser selection on the OR environment and intraoperative team performance.

多中心评估钬激光前列腺去核过程中激光技术的噪声水平和工作人员感知:前列腺去核合作倡议。
导言:钬激光前列腺去核术(HoLEP)中手术室(OR)的噪音,特别是激光激活的噪音,可能会影响手术流程和工作人员的表现。方法:于2024年6月至2026年1月在三所学术机构记录了84例HoLEP手术。激光平台包括Lumenis Moses 2.0、Quanta Litho 150、Quanta Magneto和Dornier Thulio。使用基于智能手机的标准化系统在三个阶段进行声音测量:激光关闭(基线)、空闲(不发射)和主动激光。声学指标包括平均声级(LAeq)、峰值声级(Lcpeak)和超过10%、50%和90%录音时间的声级(L10、L50和L90)。使用基线测量进行背景噪声校正,以考虑环境噪声并隔离与激光相关的声音。手术室工作人员完成了一项有效的调查,评估感知到的噪音负担(0-10分)。结果:不同平台有源激光的背景校正噪声差异显著。Litho的LAeq(60.6比68.2 dB, p = 0.023)和L10(61.5比70.6 dB, p = 0.023)的平均噪声水平低于Thulio,而Moses的LAeq高于Litho(63.1比60.6 dB, p = 0.043)。总体而言,Litho的噪音水平最低,而Thulio的噪音水平最高。调查结果与这些发现相吻合。Litho与较低的感知总体努力(2.1±0.9)相关,而Moses在沟通和专注方面表现出较高的总体努力(3.6±1.2)(图2)。Moses和Litho之间存在显著的两两差异(均为p)。结论:HoLEP期间的噪音水平因激光技术而异,并与感知沟通和认知努力的差异相关。Litho表现出最低的声负荷,而Moses和Thulio则表现出更高的噪声暴露。这些发现强调了激光选择对手术室环境和术中团队绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书