Stefano Guicciardi, Michael A Stoto, Federico Toth, Elena Savoia, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Chiara Reno, Maria Pia Fantini
{"title":"A Revised Public Health Emergency Preparedness Logic Model Reflecting the European Experience in the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Stefano Guicciardi, Michael A Stoto, Federico Toth, Elena Savoia, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Chiara Reno, Maria Pia Fantini","doi":"10.1177/23265094261472997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2017, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control developed a public health emergency preparedness logic model for European Union, differentiating between capacities (resources and infrastructure) and response capabilities (actions during emergencies). Analysis of the COVID-19 experience suggests that the main features of this logic model, including the 5 high-level categories of capabilities, remain valid. Some changes are needed, however, in 3 areas. In the detection and assessment area, \"laboratory analysis\" was integrated with \"testing\" to better represent their combined role; additionally, \"incident recognition,\" \"epidemiological investigation,\" and \"risk characterization\" were included under the wider definition of \"public health intelligence.\" In the health services area, \"preventive medicine\" was replaced with the more specific capability of \"coordination of preventive, primary care and other outpatient services (population-based medicine).\" In the emergency risk communication area, several capabilities were further clarified such as the use of infodemic management. In addition, the analyses identified 4 overarching issues that must also be consider in preparedness assessments: (1) the need to develop new strategies, approaches, and policies under pressure and to review and revise them as the pandemic evolved; (2) the challenges of implementing an emergency response in the context of a country's internal hierarchical structure of public health, healthcare, and related entities; (3) the need for coordination among the different sections of the healthcare system, particularly hospital and community-based levels; and (4) the challenges of scaling up a country's pandemic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":" ","pages":"302-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094261472997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2017, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control developed a public health emergency preparedness logic model for European Union, differentiating between capacities (resources and infrastructure) and response capabilities (actions during emergencies). Analysis of the COVID-19 experience suggests that the main features of this logic model, including the 5 high-level categories of capabilities, remain valid. Some changes are needed, however, in 3 areas. In the detection and assessment area, "laboratory analysis" was integrated with "testing" to better represent their combined role; additionally, "incident recognition," "epidemiological investigation," and "risk characterization" were included under the wider definition of "public health intelligence." In the health services area, "preventive medicine" was replaced with the more specific capability of "coordination of preventive, primary care and other outpatient services (population-based medicine)." In the emergency risk communication area, several capabilities were further clarified such as the use of infodemic management. In addition, the analyses identified 4 overarching issues that must also be consider in preparedness assessments: (1) the need to develop new strategies, approaches, and policies under pressure and to review and revise them as the pandemic evolved; (2) the challenges of implementing an emergency response in the context of a country's internal hierarchical structure of public health, healthcare, and related entities; (3) the need for coordination among the different sections of the healthcare system, particularly hospital and community-based levels; and (4) the challenges of scaling up a country's pandemic response.
期刊介绍:
Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.