Identification and Classification of Expressed Orphan Genes, Spurious Orphan Genes, and Conserved Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome.

IF 3.3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Chen Chen, Nikolaos Vakirlis, Rens Holmer, Dick de Ridder, Anne Kupczok
{"title":"Identification and Classification of Expressed Orphan Genes, Spurious Orphan Genes, and Conserved Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome.","authors":"Chen Chen, Nikolaos Vakirlis, Rens Holmer, Dick de Ridder, Anne Kupczok","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evag211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orphan genes (OGs)-genes lacking detectable homologs outside a species-are widespread in microbial genomes and are thought to contribute to their adaptation and molecular innovation. However, not all predicted OGs may represent novel functional coding sequences. False positive OGs, also called spurious OGs, can arise from gene prediction errors. We reason that OGs lacking detectable expression are more likely to be spurious. To test this, we combined large-scale metatranscriptomic profiling of the human gut microbiome with machine learning to distinguish expressed OGs from spurious ones and compare them with conserved genes (CGs) found in multiple species. Using nearly 5,000 metatranscriptome libraries, we identified ∼218,000 OGs supported by expression evidence, while ∼330,000 predicted OGs lacked detectable expression and were classified as spurious. We extracted 154 features for sequence, structural, and evolutionary properties for each gene and trained XGBoost classifiers while accounting for genomic representation. The models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 in distinguishing expressed OGs from spurious OGs and an AUC of 0.93 in distinguishing expressed OGs from CGs. Interpretation based on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) revealed clear biological signals. Particularly, expressed orphans were present in more genomes than spurious ones, and expressed OGs were shorter than CGs. This work improves OG discovery and suggests that expressed OGs differ systematically from CGs and spurious OGs in sequence composition, structural constraints, and evolutionary signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12779,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13554803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evag211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orphan genes (OGs)-genes lacking detectable homologs outside a species-are widespread in microbial genomes and are thought to contribute to their adaptation and molecular innovation. However, not all predicted OGs may represent novel functional coding sequences. False positive OGs, also called spurious OGs, can arise from gene prediction errors. We reason that OGs lacking detectable expression are more likely to be spurious. To test this, we combined large-scale metatranscriptomic profiling of the human gut microbiome with machine learning to distinguish expressed OGs from spurious ones and compare them with conserved genes (CGs) found in multiple species. Using nearly 5,000 metatranscriptome libraries, we identified ∼218,000 OGs supported by expression evidence, while ∼330,000 predicted OGs lacked detectable expression and were classified as spurious. We extracted 154 features for sequence, structural, and evolutionary properties for each gene and trained XGBoost classifiers while accounting for genomic representation. The models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 in distinguishing expressed OGs from spurious OGs and an AUC of 0.93 in distinguishing expressed OGs from CGs. Interpretation based on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) revealed clear biological signals. Particularly, expressed orphans were present in more genomes than spurious ones, and expressed OGs were shorter than CGs. This work improves OG discovery and suggests that expressed OGs differ systematically from CGs and spurious OGs in sequence composition, structural constraints, and evolutionary signals.

人类肠道微生物组中表达孤儿基因、假孤儿基因和保守基因的鉴定和分类。
孤儿基因——在物种外缺乏可检测到的同源基因——在微生物基因组中广泛存在,并被认为有助于它们的适应和分子创新。然而,并非所有预测的孤儿基因都可能代表新的功能编码序列。假阳性孤儿基因,又称假孤儿基因,可由基因预测错误引起。我们推断,缺乏可检测表达的孤儿基因更有可能是假的。为了验证这一点,我们将人类肠道微生物组的大规模亚转录组学分析与机器学习相结合,以区分表达的孤儿基因和假基因,并将它们与多个物种中发现的保守基因进行比较。利用近5000个元转录组文库,我们鉴定出了有表达证据支持的约21.8万个孤儿基因,而约33万个预测的孤儿基因缺乏可检测的表达,并被归类为假基因。我们提取了每个基因的序列、结构和进化特性的154个特征,并在考虑基因组表示的同时训练了XGBoost分类器。该模型在区分表达孤儿基因和假孤儿基因上的AUC为0.82,在区分表达孤儿基因和保守孤儿基因上的AUC为0.93。基于shap的解释揭示了清晰的生物信号。特别是,表达孤儿基因比假孤儿基因存在于更多的基因组中,表达孤儿基因比保守基因短。这项工作改进了孤儿基因的发现,并表明表达的孤儿基因在序列组成、结构约束和进化信号方面与保守基因和假孤儿基因有系统的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Biology and Evolution
Genome Biology and Evolution EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: About the journal Genome Biology and Evolution (GBE) publishes leading original research at the interface between evolutionary biology and genomics. Papers considered for publication report novel evolutionary findings that concern natural genome diversity, population genomics, the structure, function, organisation and expression of genomes, comparative genomics, proteomics, and environmental genomic interactions. Major evolutionary insights from the fields of computational biology, structural biology, developmental biology, and cell biology are also considered, as are theoretical advances in the field of genome evolution. GBE’s scope embraces genome-wide evolutionary investigations at all taxonomic levels and for all forms of life — within populations or across domains. Its aims are to further the understanding of genomes in their evolutionary context and further the understanding of evolution from a genome-wide perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书