Bioprosthetic Valve Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Antonin Trimaille, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Marina Urena, Alberto Alperi, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez, Luis Nombela-Franco, Victoria Vilalta, Maria Del Trigo, Antonio J Muñoz-García, Giovanni Esposito, Vincent Auffret, David Del Val, Vicenç Serra, Jorge Nuche, Lluis Asmarats, Ander Regueiro, Adrien Carmona, Quentin Fisher, Pablo Avanzas, Víctor Fradejas-Sastre, Ivan Sanchez, Michele Trichilo, Juan Francisco Oteo, Anna Franzone, Maxime Nolf, Fernando Alfonso, Pedro Díaz Pockels, Rocío Rodríguez-Santolino, Dabit Arzamendi, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Olivier Morel, Marisa Avvedimento, Josep Rodés-Cabau
{"title":"Bioprosthetic Valve Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.","authors":"Antonin Trimaille, Pedro Cepas-Guillén, Marina Urena, Alberto Alperi, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez, Luis Nombela-Franco, Victoria Vilalta, Maria Del Trigo, Antonio J Muñoz-García, Giovanni Esposito, Vincent Auffret, David Del Val, Vicenç Serra, Jorge Nuche, Lluis Asmarats, Ander Regueiro, Adrien Carmona, Quentin Fisher, Pablo Avanzas, Víctor Fradejas-Sastre, Ivan Sanchez, Michele Trichilo, Juan Francisco Oteo, Anna Franzone, Maxime Nolf, Fernando Alfonso, Pedro Díaz Pockels, Rocío Rodríguez-Santolino, Dabit Arzamendi, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Olivier Morel, Marisa Avvedimento, Josep Rodés-Cabau","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.126.016892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the long-term incidence and clinical impact of bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement remain limited. This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of BVF following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from an international, multicenter registry including consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement at 13 centers. The primary outcome was BVF according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. The cumulative incidence of BVF was estimated using a competing-risk approach. The association between BVF and clinical outcomes was assessed using competing-risk models with BVF as a time-dependent covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7501 patients, BVF occurred in 380 (5.1%) patients over a median follow-up of 4 (interquartile range, 2-5) years. The cumulative incidence of BVF increased over time, reaching 1.4% at 1 year, 4.6% at 5 years, and 8.3% at 10 years. Independent predictors of BVF included younger age, smoking, balloon-expandable valve, prosthesis size <26 mm, valve-in-valve procedure, mean gradient at discharge ≥15 mm Hg, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation at discharge, and early hemodynamic valve deterioration. BVF was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.47-2.01]; <i>P</i><0.001), cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% CI, 2.73-3.82]; <i>P</i><0.001), stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.08-4.23]; <i>P</i>=0.043), and heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.98]; <i>P</i>=0.032). Consistent findings were observed in different sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BVF is a clinically relevant event associated with adverse long-term outcomes. These findings support the implementation of tailored surveillance and preventive strategies to mitigate BVF-related risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e016892"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.126.016892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data on the long-term incidence and clinical impact of bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement remain limited. This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of BVF following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Methods: We analyzed data from an international, multicenter registry including consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement at 13 centers. The primary outcome was BVF according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. The cumulative incidence of BVF was estimated using a competing-risk approach. The association between BVF and clinical outcomes was assessed using competing-risk models with BVF as a time-dependent covariate.

Results: Among 7501 patients, BVF occurred in 380 (5.1%) patients over a median follow-up of 4 (interquartile range, 2-5) years. The cumulative incidence of BVF increased over time, reaching 1.4% at 1 year, 4.6% at 5 years, and 8.3% at 10 years. Independent predictors of BVF included younger age, smoking, balloon-expandable valve, prosthesis size <26 mm, valve-in-valve procedure, mean gradient at discharge ≥15 mm Hg, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation at discharge, and early hemodynamic valve deterioration. BVF was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.47-2.01]; P<0.001), cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% CI, 2.73-3.82]; P<0.001), stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.08-4.23]; P=0.043), and heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.98]; P=0.032). Consistent findings were observed in different sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: BVF is a clinically relevant event associated with adverse long-term outcomes. These findings support the implementation of tailored surveillance and preventive strategies to mitigate BVF-related risk.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后生物瓣膜失效。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后生物瓣膜衰竭(BVF)的长期发生率和临床影响的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术后BVF的发生率、预测因素和临床影响。方法:我们分析了来自国际多中心注册的数据,包括13个中心连续接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者。根据Valve学术研究联盟-3标准,主要结局是BVF。采用竞争风险法估计BVF的累积发病率。使用竞争风险模型评估BVF与临床结果之间的关系,BVF作为一个时间相关的协变量。结果:在7501例患者中,380例(5.1%)患者发生BVF,随访时间中位数为4年(四分位数间距为2-5年)。BVF的累积发病率随着时间的推移而增加,1年达到1.4%,5年达到4.6%,10年达到8.3%。BVF的独立预测因素包括年龄较小、吸烟、球囊可扩张瓣膜、假体尺寸(PPP=0.043)和心力衰竭住院(校正风险比1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.98]; P=0.032)。在不同的敏感性分析中观察到一致的结果。结论:BVF是一种与不良长期预后相关的临床相关事件。这些发现支持实施有针对性的监测和预防战略,以减轻与bvf相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书