Clinical Assessment of Smokers with Persistent Dyspnoea but Unremarkable Spirometry: The Added Value of Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Matthew D James, Sandra G Vincent, Amany F Elbehairy, Devin B Phillips, J Alberto Neder, Satvir S Dhillon, Christopher J Ryerson, Wan Tan, Jordan A Guenette, Michael K Stickland, Denis E O'Donnell
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of Smokers with Persistent Dyspnoea but Unremarkable Spirometry: The Added Value of Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide.","authors":"Matthew D James, Sandra G Vincent, Amany F Elbehairy, Devin B Phillips, J Alberto Neder, Satvir S Dhillon, Christopher J Ryerson, Wan Tan, Jordan A Guenette, Michael K Stickland, Denis E O'Donnell","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2026.2705831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term smokers with persistent dyspnoea and exercise intolerance, who are at risk for COPD, require careful clinical assessment. However, many such individuals have only minor abnormalities on spirometry, and it is not known if various additional tests of small airways dysfunction (SAD) or pulmonary microvascular deficits, offer added clinical value. In this study we wished to determine which of the available resting pulmonary function tests (e.g. airway mechanics and lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, DL<sub>CO</sub>) best uncover the physiological underpinnings of these troublesome respiratory symptoms. This tri-centre, prospective study enrolled 90 volunteers: 33 non-smoker controls, 57 symptomatic smokers, 38 of whom had Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease Grade 1 COPD). Participants completed impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry, body plethysmography, DL<sub>CO</sub>, single and multiple breath nitrogen washout and an incremental cycle cardiopulmonary exercise test. Smokers had more diverse physiological abnormalities, greater dyspnoea and exercise intolerance than healthy controls. Stepwise multilinear regression revealed that DL<sub>CO</sub> was the only independent predictor of dyspnoea burden (ratio of peak dyspnoea score to peak oxygen uptake (<i>V̇</i>O<sub>2peak</sub>)), lower <i>V̇</i>O<sub>2peak</sub>, higher ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (<i>V̇</i><sub>E</sub>/<i>V̇</i>CO<sub>2</sub> nadir) and dynamic inspiratory mechanical constraints (higher tidal volume to inspiratory capacity ratio), after accounting for age, sex, height, and smoking history. In symptomatic smokers, reduced DL<sub>CO</sub>, contributed more to the variance in exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance than all airway mechanical measurements. This attests to the added value of DL<sub>CO</sub> for clinicians assessing the nature and extent of smoking-related lung injury in individuals with only minor airway obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"23 1","pages":"2705831"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2026.2705831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term smokers with persistent dyspnoea and exercise intolerance, who are at risk for COPD, require careful clinical assessment. However, many such individuals have only minor abnormalities on spirometry, and it is not known if various additional tests of small airways dysfunction (SAD) or pulmonary microvascular deficits, offer added clinical value. In this study we wished to determine which of the available resting pulmonary function tests (e.g. airway mechanics and lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, DLCO) best uncover the physiological underpinnings of these troublesome respiratory symptoms. This tri-centre, prospective study enrolled 90 volunteers: 33 non-smoker controls, 57 symptomatic smokers, 38 of whom had Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease Grade 1 COPD). Participants completed impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry, body plethysmography, DLCO, single and multiple breath nitrogen washout and an incremental cycle cardiopulmonary exercise test. Smokers had more diverse physiological abnormalities, greater dyspnoea and exercise intolerance than healthy controls. Stepwise multilinear regression revealed that DLCO was the only independent predictor of dyspnoea burden (ratio of peak dyspnoea score to peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak)), lower V̇O2peak, higher ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (V̇E/V̇CO2 nadir) and dynamic inspiratory mechanical constraints (higher tidal volume to inspiratory capacity ratio), after accounting for age, sex, height, and smoking history. In symptomatic smokers, reduced DLCO, contributed more to the variance in exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance than all airway mechanical measurements. This attests to the added value of DLCO for clinicians assessing the nature and extent of smoking-related lung injury in individuals with only minor airway obstruction.

持续呼吸困难但肺量测量不显著的吸烟者的临床评价:一氧化碳弥散能力的附加值。
有持续性呼吸困难和运动不耐受风险的长期吸烟者需要仔细的临床评估。然而,许多这样的个体在肺活量测量上只有轻微的异常,并且不知道是否各种附加的小气道功能障碍(SAD)或肺微血管缺陷的测试提供了额外的临床价值。在这项研究中,我们希望确定哪一种可用的静息肺功能测试(例如气道力学和肺一氧化碳弥散能力)最能揭示这些令人烦恼的呼吸道症状的生理基础。这项三中心前瞻性研究招募了90名志愿者:33名非吸烟者对照,57名有症状的吸烟者,其中38名患有全球阻塞性肺疾病(1级COPD)。参与者完成了脉冲振荡测量(IOS)、肺活量测定、体体积脉搏波、DLCO、单次和多次呼吸氮冲洗和增量周期心肺运动测试。与健康对照组相比,吸烟者有更多不同的生理异常,更严重的呼吸困难和运动不耐受。逐步多元线性回归显示,在考虑了年龄、性别、身高和吸烟史等因素后,DLCO是呼吸困难负担(峰值呼吸困难评分与峰值摄氧量之比)、较低的V / o2峰值、较高的二氧化碳通气量(V / E/V / CO2最低点)和动态吸气机械约束(较高的潮气量与吸气容量之比)的唯一独立预测因子。在有症状的吸烟者中,与所有气道机械测量相比,DLCO降低对用力性呼吸困难和运动不耐受的影响更大。这证明了DLCO对临床医生评估只有轻微气道阻塞的个体吸烟相关肺损伤的性质和程度的附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书