Diagnostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase and S100 calcium-binding protein B for sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
IF 2.2 4区 医学Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
{"title":"Diagnostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase and S100 calcium-binding protein B for sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhang Li, Shuyu Zhong, Minjing Chen, Huan Chen","doi":"10.1080/1354750X.2026.2722073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a frequent and serious complication of sepsis, but reliable diagnostic biomarkers remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) in distinguishing SAE from sepsis without SAE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science between inception and January 2026. Studies comparing serum NSE and/or S100B levels between patients with SAE and patients with sepsis without SAE were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies involving 722 participants (323 with SAE and 399 with sepsis but no SAE) were included. Both NSE and S100B levels were significantly elevated in the SAE group compared with the sepsis without SAE group. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for NSE was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.97, P < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), indicating a large effect size with minimal heterogeneity. The pooled SMD for S100B was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.77-1.11, P < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), also demonstrating a large effect size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serum NSE and S100B are significantly elevated in SAE and may help identify SAE early in patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8921,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"485-493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2026.2722073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a frequent and serious complication of sepsis, but reliable diagnostic biomarkers remain limited.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) in distinguishing SAE from sepsis without SAE.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science between inception and January 2026. Studies comparing serum NSE and/or S100B levels between patients with SAE and patients with sepsis without SAE were included.
Results: Eight studies involving 722 participants (323 with SAE and 399 with sepsis but no SAE) were included. Both NSE and S100B levels were significantly elevated in the SAE group compared with the sepsis without SAE group. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for NSE was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.97, P < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%), indicating a large effect size with minimal heterogeneity. The pooled SMD for S100B was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.77-1.11, P < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%), also demonstrating a large effect size.
Conclusions: Serum NSE and S100B are significantly elevated in SAE and may help identify SAE early in patients with sepsis.
期刊介绍:
The journal Biomarkers brings together all aspects of the rapidly growing field of biomarker research, encompassing their various uses and applications in one essential source.
Biomarkers provides a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and concepts in all areas of biomarker research. High quality papers in four main areas are accepted and manuscripts describing novel biomarkers and their subsequent validation are especially encouraged:
• Biomarkers of disease
• Biomarkers of exposure
• Biomarkers of response
• Biomarkers of susceptibility
Manuscripts can describe biomarkers measured in humans or other animals in vivo or in vitro. Biomarkers will consider publishing negative data from studies of biomarkers of susceptibility in human populations.