Confidence intervals for the overlap coefficient under multimodal distributions: with an application to breast cancer diagnosis

IF 1.6 4区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
A. Alcaraz-Peñalba, A.M. Franco-Pereira, M. C. Pardo
{"title":"Confidence intervals for the overlap coefficient under multimodal distributions: with an application to breast cancer diagnosis","authors":"A. Alcaraz-Peñalba,&nbsp;A.M. Franco-Pereira,&nbsp;M. C. Pardo","doi":"10.1007/s10182-025-00545-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In medical diagnostic research, medical diagnostic tests with continuous values are widely employed to distinguish between diseased and non-diseased subjects. In light of the overlap coefficient’s (OVL) practical relevance and intuitive interpretability as a measure of distributional similarity, this measure has been proposed to assess the accuracy of these tests. Several inference methods for constructing confidence intervals for OVL have recently been developed. However, the most promising inference methods for constructing confidence intervals have not yet been systematically compared. In this paper, we first compare two of the most accurate approaches. The performances of these methods are evaluated empirically under a variety of distributional scenarios. At sight of these results, a novel delta method for mixtures of normal distributions is introduced and compared with the generalized pivotal quantity-based approach. Finally, all these approaches are applied to datasets on diabetes and breast cancer diagnosis to assess the glucose and the mean radius of the tumor cells, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55446,"journal":{"name":"Asta-Advances in Statistical Analysis","volume":"110 3","pages":"613 - 637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asta-Advances in Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10182-025-00545-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In medical diagnostic research, medical diagnostic tests with continuous values are widely employed to distinguish between diseased and non-diseased subjects. In light of the overlap coefficient’s (OVL) practical relevance and intuitive interpretability as a measure of distributional similarity, this measure has been proposed to assess the accuracy of these tests. Several inference methods for constructing confidence intervals for OVL have recently been developed. However, the most promising inference methods for constructing confidence intervals have not yet been systematically compared. In this paper, we first compare two of the most accurate approaches. The performances of these methods are evaluated empirically under a variety of distributional scenarios. At sight of these results, a novel delta method for mixtures of normal distributions is introduced and compared with the generalized pivotal quantity-based approach. Finally, all these approaches are applied to datasets on diabetes and breast cancer diagnosis to assess the glucose and the mean radius of the tumor cells, respectively.

多模态分布下重叠系数的置信区间:在乳腺癌诊断中的应用
在医学诊断研究中,具有连续值的医学诊断试验被广泛用于区分患病和非患病受试者。鉴于重叠系数(OVL)的实际相关性和作为分布相似性度量的直观可解释性,已提出该度量来评估这些测试的准确性。近年来发展了几种用于构造OVL置信区间的推理方法。然而,构造置信区间的最有前途的推理方法尚未得到系统的比较。在本文中,我们首先比较了两种最准确的方法。在各种分布场景下对这些方法的性能进行了经验评估。鉴于这些结果,本文介绍了一种新的用于正态分布混合的delta方法,并与广义的基于关键量的方法进行了比较。最后,将所有这些方法应用于糖尿病和乳腺癌诊断数据集,分别评估肿瘤细胞的葡萄糖和平均半径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asta-Advances in Statistical Analysis
Asta-Advances in Statistical Analysis 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AStA - Advances in Statistical Analysis, a journal of the German Statistical Society, is published quarterly and presents original contributions on statistical methods and applications and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书