Comparative Study on Gas-Particle Acceleration Behavior in Straight Divergent and Curved Divergent Cold Spray Nozzles: Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation

IF 3.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS
Wenpeng Wan, Zhe Zhan, Chunjie Huang, Zunjia Li, Hongxia Zhou, Wenya Li
{"title":"Comparative Study on Gas-Particle Acceleration Behavior in Straight Divergent and Curved Divergent Cold Spray Nozzles: Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation","authors":"Wenpeng Wan,&nbsp;Zhe Zhan,&nbsp;Chunjie Huang,&nbsp;Zunjia Li,&nbsp;Hongxia Zhou,&nbsp;Wenya Li","doi":"10.1007/s11666-026-02263-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study combined three-dimensional CFD numerical simulations with Lagrangian particle tracking and experimental deposition to compare straight divergent and curved divergent nozzles for cold spray under identical stagnation conditions (3 MPa, 600 °C). Importantly, the two nozzle geometries were designed to have the same expansion ratio and divergent-section length, enabling an isolated assessment of downstream profile effects. The curved divergent nozzle accelerated the gas more rapidly: Peak axial velocity reached 1003 m/s at about 114 mm downstream versus 937 m/s at the exit (220 mm downstream) for the straight divergent nozzle. The curved divergent geometry produced a faster pressure decay and earlier temperature reduction in the downstream region while also producing a stronger exit shock. Lagrangian particle tracking predicted higher impact velocities for Al, Ti, and Cu particles across 10-50 μm; mean increases (curved divergent versus straight divergent) ranged roughly from 11 to 44 m/s depending on material and diameter. Furthermore, for the investigated parameters, particles of 10-30 μm were recommended to maximize curved divergent nozzle benefits. Experimental Cu coatings validated the simulations: Curved divergent nozzle coatings were more uniform and thicker (1730 μm) than straight divergent coatings (1120 μm), corresponding to 1.5 times higher deposition efficiency. These results quantify the influence of the nozzle downstream profile on gas acceleration efficiency and demonstrate that changes in the gas field produced by different profiles consequently modify particle acceleration and deposition behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Spray Technology","volume":"35 6","pages":"2408 - 2423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Spray Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11666-026-02263-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study combined three-dimensional CFD numerical simulations with Lagrangian particle tracking and experimental deposition to compare straight divergent and curved divergent nozzles for cold spray under identical stagnation conditions (3 MPa, 600 °C). Importantly, the two nozzle geometries were designed to have the same expansion ratio and divergent-section length, enabling an isolated assessment of downstream profile effects. The curved divergent nozzle accelerated the gas more rapidly: Peak axial velocity reached 1003 m/s at about 114 mm downstream versus 937 m/s at the exit (220 mm downstream) for the straight divergent nozzle. The curved divergent geometry produced a faster pressure decay and earlier temperature reduction in the downstream region while also producing a stronger exit shock. Lagrangian particle tracking predicted higher impact velocities for Al, Ti, and Cu particles across 10-50 μm; mean increases (curved divergent versus straight divergent) ranged roughly from 11 to 44 m/s depending on material and diameter. Furthermore, for the investigated parameters, particles of 10-30 μm were recommended to maximize curved divergent nozzle benefits. Experimental Cu coatings validated the simulations: Curved divergent nozzle coatings were more uniform and thicker (1730 μm) than straight divergent coatings (1120 μm), corresponding to 1.5 times higher deposition efficiency. These results quantify the influence of the nozzle downstream profile on gas acceleration efficiency and demonstrate that changes in the gas field produced by different profiles consequently modify particle acceleration and deposition behavior.

直发散型与弯发散型冷喷嘴气粒加速特性的比较研究:数值模拟与实验验证
本研究将三维CFD数值模拟与拉格朗日粒子跟踪和实验沉积相结合,对相同停滞条件(3 MPa, 600℃)下的直发散型和弯发散型冷喷雾进行了比较。重要的是,这两种喷嘴的几何形状设计具有相同的膨胀比和发散段长度,可以独立评估下游剖面的影响。弯曲发散型喷管加速气体的速度更快:在出口下游约114 mm处轴向速度峰值达到1003 m/s,而直发散型喷管在出口下游约220 mm处轴向速度峰值达到937 m/s。弯曲的发散几何形状在下游区域产生更快的压力衰减和更早的温度降低,同时也产生更强的出口冲击。拉格朗日粒子跟踪预测了Al, Ti和Cu粒子在10-50 μm范围内的更高撞击速度;根据材料和直径的不同,平均增幅(弯曲发散与直线发散)大致在11到44米/秒之间。此外,对于所研究的参数,建议采用10 ~ 30 μm的颗粒来最大化弯曲发散喷嘴的效益。实验结果验证了模拟结果:弯曲发散式喷嘴涂层比直发散式涂层(1120 μm)更均匀、更厚(1730 μm),沉积效率提高1.5倍。这些结果量化了喷嘴下游剖面对气体加速效率的影响,并证明了不同剖面产生的气场变化会改变颗粒的加速和沉积行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 工程技术-材料科学:膜
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
25.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: From the scientific to the practical, stay on top of advances in this fast-growing coating technology with ASM International''s Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. Critically reviewed scientific papers and engineering articles combine the best of new research with the latest applications and problem solving. A service of the ASM Thermal Spray Society (TSS), the Journal of Thermal Spray Technology covers all fundamental and practical aspects of thermal spray science, including processes, feedstock manufacture, and testing and characterization. The journal contains worldwide coverage of the latest research, products, equipment and process developments, and includes technical note case studies from real-time applications and in-depth topical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书