Conversations about conversational code: on the collaborative critical code studies reading of ELIZA

IF 6.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mark C. Marino, Peggy Weil, Jeff Shrager, Arthur Schwarz, Anthony Hay, Sarah Ciston, David M. Berry, Peter Millican
{"title":"Conversations about conversational code: on the collaborative critical code studies reading of ELIZA","authors":"Mark C. Marino,&nbsp;Peggy Weil,&nbsp;Jeff Shrager,&nbsp;Arthur Schwarz,&nbsp;Anthony Hay,&nbsp;Sarah Ciston,&nbsp;David M. Berry,&nbsp;Peter Millican","doi":"10.1007/s00146-026-03086-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Published in 1966, Joseph Weizenbaum’s ELIZA is the first conversational agent or chatbot, most famous for its DOCTOR persona. In 2021, a group of scholars recovered the original source code for ELIZA from the MIT archives. For about four years, an expanded team of eight scholars from diverse disciplines explored this code through weekly meetings in one of the longest ongoing projects of critical code studies. This paper presents both the methodology of conversational close reading as well as the substantive findings that resulted from the sustained collaborative inquiry. Their investigation examined not only how ELIZA functions technically but also what it reveals about the cultural moment of its development and its enduring influence. The team interrogated the code by reading it line-by-line, porting it to other languages, and attempting to run it on emulators, while also consulting archival materials and conducting interviews with Weizenbaum’s contemporaries. This collaborative approach revealed significant discrepancies between Weizenbaum’s published descriptions of ELIZA and its actual implementation, including previously undocumented features and editing of canonical conversations. The project demonstrates how critical code studies can operate as a conversational method, where a team of scholars with diverse disciplinary backgrounds can use a technical analysis to open up a broader cultural and philosophical discussion. By treating source code as a cultural text rich with historical significance, this work bridges software history with code analysis and offers insights into the development of human–computer conversation that have become more increasingly relevant in today’s era of large language models. This paper selectively documents the team’s process, discoveries, and reflections, offering their collaborative model as a template for understanding both historical and contemporary computational artifacts for future projects in critical code studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"41 on","pages":"7129 - 7142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-026-03086-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-026-03086-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Published in 1966, Joseph Weizenbaum’s ELIZA is the first conversational agent or chatbot, most famous for its DOCTOR persona. In 2021, a group of scholars recovered the original source code for ELIZA from the MIT archives. For about four years, an expanded team of eight scholars from diverse disciplines explored this code through weekly meetings in one of the longest ongoing projects of critical code studies. This paper presents both the methodology of conversational close reading as well as the substantive findings that resulted from the sustained collaborative inquiry. Their investigation examined not only how ELIZA functions technically but also what it reveals about the cultural moment of its development and its enduring influence. The team interrogated the code by reading it line-by-line, porting it to other languages, and attempting to run it on emulators, while also consulting archival materials and conducting interviews with Weizenbaum’s contemporaries. This collaborative approach revealed significant discrepancies between Weizenbaum’s published descriptions of ELIZA and its actual implementation, including previously undocumented features and editing of canonical conversations. The project demonstrates how critical code studies can operate as a conversational method, where a team of scholars with diverse disciplinary backgrounds can use a technical analysis to open up a broader cultural and philosophical discussion. By treating source code as a cultural text rich with historical significance, this work bridges software history with code analysis and offers insights into the development of human–computer conversation that have become more increasingly relevant in today’s era of large language models. This paper selectively documents the team’s process, discoveries, and reflections, offering their collaborative model as a template for understanding both historical and contemporary computational artifacts for future projects in critical code studies.

关于会话代码的对话:关于ELIZA的协作批判性代码研究阅读
Joseph Weizenbaum的ELIZA于1966年出版,是第一个会话代理或聊天机器人,最著名的是它的博士角色。2021年,一群学者从麻省理工学院的档案中恢复了ELIZA的原始源代码。在大约四年的时间里,一个由来自不同学科的八名学者组成的扩展团队在持续时间最长的关键代码研究项目之一的每周会议上探索了这个代码。本文介绍了对话式细读的方法,以及持续合作探究所产生的实质性发现。他们的调查不仅考察了ELIZA在技术上的功能,还考察了它在发展过程中所揭示的文化时刻及其持久的影响。团队通过一行一行地阅读代码,将其移植到其他语言,并尝试在模拟器上运行代码,同时还查阅档案材料并与Weizenbaum同时代的人进行采访。这种协作方法揭示了Weizenbaum发表的ELIZA描述与实际实现之间的显著差异,包括以前未记录的特性和规范对话的编辑。该项目展示了关键代码研究如何作为一种对话方法运作,在这种方法中,具有不同学科背景的学者团队可以使用技术分析来开启更广泛的文化和哲学讨论。通过将源代码视为具有丰富历史意义的文化文本,这本书将软件历史与代码分析联系起来,并提供了对人机对话发展的见解,人机对话在当今大型语言模型时代变得越来越相关。本文选择性地记录了团队的过程、发现和反思,提供了他们的协作模型作为模板,用于理解关键代码研究中未来项目的历史和当代计算工件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AI & Society
AI & Society COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
257
期刊介绍: AI & Society: Knowledge, Culture and Communication, is an International Journal publishing refereed scholarly articles, position papers, debates, short communications, and reviews of books and other publications. Established in 1987, the Journal focuses on societal issues including the design, use, management, and policy of information, communications and new media technologies, with a particular emphasis on cultural, social, cognitive, economic, ethical, and philosophical implications. AI & Society has a broad scope and is strongly interdisciplinary. We welcome contributions and participation from researchers and practitioners in a variety of fields including information technologies, humanities, social sciences, arts and sciences. This includes broader societal and cultural impacts, for example on governance, security, sustainability, identity, inclusion, working life, corporate and community welfare, and well-being of people. Co-authored articles from diverse disciplines are encouraged. AI & Society seeks to promote an understanding of the potential, transformative impacts and critical consequences of pervasive technology for societies. Technological innovations, including new sciences such as biotech, nanotech and neuroscience, offer a great potential for societies, but also pose existential risk. Rooted in the human-centred tradition of science and technology, the Journal acts as a catalyst, promoter and facilitator of engagement with diversity of voices and over-the-horizon issues of arts, science, technology and society. AI & Society expects that, in keeping with the ethos of the journal, submissions should provide a substantial and explicit argument on the societal dimension of research, particularly the benefits, impacts and implications for society. This may include factors such as trust, biases, privacy, reliability, responsibility, and competence of AI systems. Such arguments should be validated by critical comment on current research in this area. Curmudgeon Corner will retain its opinionated ethos. The journal is in three parts: a) full length scholarly articles; b) strategic ideas, critical reviews and reflections; c) Student Forum is for emerging researchers and new voices to communicate their ongoing research to the wider academic community, mentored by the Journal Advisory Board; Book Reviews and News; Curmudgeon Corner for the opinionated. Papers in the Original Section may include original papers, which are underpinned by theoretical, methodological, conceptual or philosophical foundations. The Open Forum Section may include strategic ideas, critical reviews and potential implications for society of current research. Network Research Section papers make substantial contributions to theoretical and methodological foundations within societal domains. These will be multi-authored papers that include a summary of the contribution of each author to the paper. Original, Open Forum and Network papers are peer reviewed. The Student Forum Section may include theoretical, methodological, and application orientations of ongoing research including case studies, as well as, contextual action research experiences. Papers in this section are normally single-authored and are also formally reviewed. Curmudgeon Corner is a short opinionated column on trends in technology, arts, science and society, commenting emphatically on issues of concern to the research community and wider society. Normal word length: Original and Network Articles 10k, Open Forum 8k, Student Forum 6k, Curmudgeon 1k. The exception to the co-author limit of Original and Open Forum (4), Network (10), Student (3) and Curmudgeon (2) articles will be considered for their special contributions. Please do not send your submissions by email but use the "Submit manuscript" button. NOTE TO AUTHORS: The Journal expects its authors to include, in their submissions: a) An acknowledgement of the pre-accept/pre-publication versions of their manuscripts on non-commercial and academic sites. b) Images: obtain permissions from the copyright holder/original sources. c) Formal permission from their ethics committees when conducting studies with people.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书