A probabilistic collision–energy framework for predicting polymetallic nodule degradation in deep–sea mining risers

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MARINE
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.joes.2026.08.004
Rui Guo, Haining Lu, Hao Zheng, Xiaojun Zhuo, Maolin Li, Liwen Deng
{"title":"A probabilistic collision–energy framework for predicting polymetallic nodule degradation in deep–sea mining risers","authors":"Rui Guo,&nbsp;Haining Lu,&nbsp;Hao Zheng,&nbsp;Xiaojun Zhuo,&nbsp;Maolin Li,&nbsp;Liwen Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.joes.2026.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Particle degradation during long–distance hydraulic lifting can reduce nodule recovery, increase blockage risk, and generate fine particles that affect downstream handling and discharge control in deep–sea mining systems. However, direct prediction over kilometer–scale riser distances remains difficult. Resolved computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method (CFD–DEM) simulations are limited to short pipe sections, while empirical models provide limited insight into collision–energy mechanisms. This study develops a probabilistic collision–energy framework to predict nodule degradation in deep–sea mining risers. The model combines particle–wall impact accessibility, concentration–dependent shielding, impact–velocity probability distribution, fatigue–controlled fragmentation, and abrasion–induced surface loss in a unified formulation. Abrasion and fragmentation are treated as distinct mass–transfer pathways, linking fines generation and daughter–fragment redistribution to collision–energy exposure. Key collision statistics are assessed using CFD–DEM data, and the full model is evaluated against long–distance experimental particle–size distribution (PSD) data. Results show that particle–particle contacts are more frequent than particle–wall impacts but have lower wall–equivalent destructive energy, mainly contributing to cumulative abrasion and fine generation. Wall impacts are more relevant to fatigue damage and primary fragmentation. Pipe enlargement suppresses wall–impact fragmentation, whereas increasing solid concentration shifts degradation toward particle–particle abrasion. The resulting regime map distinguishes abrasion–dominated and fragmentation–prone conditions, providing a practical basis for degradation–risk assessment in deep–sea hydraulic lifting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48514,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 1400-1418"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468013326001373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Particle degradation during long–distance hydraulic lifting can reduce nodule recovery, increase blockage risk, and generate fine particles that affect downstream handling and discharge control in deep–sea mining systems. However, direct prediction over kilometer–scale riser distances remains difficult. Resolved computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method (CFD–DEM) simulations are limited to short pipe sections, while empirical models provide limited insight into collision–energy mechanisms. This study develops a probabilistic collision–energy framework to predict nodule degradation in deep–sea mining risers. The model combines particle–wall impact accessibility, concentration–dependent shielding, impact–velocity probability distribution, fatigue–controlled fragmentation, and abrasion–induced surface loss in a unified formulation. Abrasion and fragmentation are treated as distinct mass–transfer pathways, linking fines generation and daughter–fragment redistribution to collision–energy exposure. Key collision statistics are assessed using CFD–DEM data, and the full model is evaluated against long–distance experimental particle–size distribution (PSD) data. Results show that particle–particle contacts are more frequent than particle–wall impacts but have lower wall–equivalent destructive energy, mainly contributing to cumulative abrasion and fine generation. Wall impacts are more relevant to fatigue damage and primary fragmentation. Pipe enlargement suppresses wall–impact fragmentation, whereas increasing solid concentration shifts degradation toward particle–particle abrasion. The resulting regime map distinguishes abrasion–dominated and fragmentation–prone conditions, providing a practical basis for degradation–risk assessment in deep–sea hydraulic lifting.
预测深海采矿立管多金属结核退化的概率碰撞-能量框架
在深海采矿系统中,长距离液压举升过程中的颗粒降解会降低结核回收,增加堵塞风险,并产生影响下游处理和排放控制的细颗粒。然而,直接预测千米尺度的立管距离仍然很困难。求解计算流体力学离散元法(CFD-DEM)的模拟仅限于短管段,而经验模型对碰撞能量机制的了解有限。本研究开发了一个概率碰撞能量框架来预测深海采矿立管中的结核退化。该模型将颗粒壁冲击可达性、浓度依赖性屏蔽、冲击速度概率分布、疲劳控制破碎和磨损引起的表面损失结合在一个统一的公式中。磨损和破碎被视为不同的传质途径,将细粒的产生和女儿碎片的重新分配与碰撞能量暴露联系起来。使用CFD-DEM数据评估关键碰撞统计量,并根据远距离实验粒径分布(PSD)数据评估完整模型。结果表明:颗粒与颗粒之间的接触频率高于颗粒与壁面的碰撞,但壁面等效破坏能较低,这主要是造成累积磨损和细粒生成的原因;壁面冲击与疲劳损伤和初破片的关系更大。管道的扩大抑制了壁面冲击破碎,而固体浓度的增加使降解转向颗粒-颗粒磨损。生成的状态图区分了磨损为主和易破碎的情况,为深海液压举升的退化风险评估提供了实用依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
19.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science (JOES) serves as a platform for disseminating original research and advancements in the realm of ocean engineering and science. JOES encourages the submission of papers covering various aspects of ocean engineering and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书