Comparative Effect of Dual-Combination Antihypertensive Regimens on Reducing 24-Hour Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Modifying Nocturnal Dipping Shifts: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.2
Dan Shan, Xiuxiu Yin, Wenfang Niu, Jiawei Ren, Yu-E Xing, Hongyan Chen
{"title":"Comparative Effect of Dual-Combination Antihypertensive Regimens on Reducing 24-Hour Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Modifying Nocturnal Dipping Shifts: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Dan Shan, Xiuxiu Yin, Wenfang Niu, Jiawei Ren, Yu-E Xing, Hongyan Chen","doi":"10.1159/mpp/adpag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective cohort study evaluated the real-world clinical effects of four dual-combination antihypertensive regimens on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure variability (BPV) and circadian rhythm modifications over a 24-week period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 302 adults with primary hypertension were evaluated across parallel cohorts: an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker group (ACEi+CCB, n = 76), an angiotensin II receptor blocker plus thiazide diuretic group (ARB+Thiazide, n = 75), a β-blocker plus thiazide group (BB+Thiazide, n = 74), and a calcium channel blocker plus β-blocker group (CCB+BB, n = 77). A 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), and night-to-day SBP ratios were analyzed to assess hemodynamic variations independent of absolute blood pressure lowering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While all regimens significantly reduced mean office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, the ACEi+CCB combination demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in the 24-h systolic CV from baseline to week 24 (from 10.35% ± 1.25% to 7.45% ± 0.92%, a relative drop of -28.0%) compared to the ARB+Thiazide (-15.1%), CCB+BB (-14.4%), and BB+Thiazide (-4.8%) cohorts (p < 0.001 after adjusting for absolute BP reduction). Additionally, the ACEi+CCB group achieved a significant downward shift in the continuous night-to-day SBP ratio from 0.96 ± 0.04 to 0.91 ± 0.03 (p < 0.001), outperforming the ARB+Thiazide and BB+Thiazide arms. Treatment compliance (92%-95%) and overall adverse event rates (7.1%-9.7%) remained comparable across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual therapies show class-dependent effects on BPV and circadian rhythm; ACEi+CCB most effectively reduces 24-h systolic fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520708,"journal":{"name":"Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13688687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/mpp/adpag009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the real-world clinical effects of four dual-combination antihypertensive regimens on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure variability (BPV) and circadian rhythm modifications over a 24-week period.

Methods: A total of 302 adults with primary hypertension were evaluated across parallel cohorts: an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker group (ACEi+CCB, n = 76), an angiotensin II receptor blocker plus thiazide diuretic group (ARB+Thiazide, n = 75), a β-blocker plus thiazide group (BB+Thiazide, n = 74), and a calcium channel blocker plus β-blocker group (CCB+BB, n = 77). A 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), and night-to-day SBP ratios were analyzed to assess hemodynamic variations independent of absolute blood pressure lowering.

Results: While all regimens significantly reduced mean office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, the ACEi+CCB combination demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in the 24-h systolic CV from baseline to week 24 (from 10.35% ± 1.25% to 7.45% ± 0.92%, a relative drop of -28.0%) compared to the ARB+Thiazide (-15.1%), CCB+BB (-14.4%), and BB+Thiazide (-4.8%) cohorts (p < 0.001 after adjusting for absolute BP reduction). Additionally, the ACEi+CCB group achieved a significant downward shift in the continuous night-to-day SBP ratio from 0.96 ± 0.04 to 0.91 ± 0.03 (p < 0.001), outperforming the ARB+Thiazide and BB+Thiazide arms. Treatment compliance (92%-95%) and overall adverse event rates (7.1%-9.7%) remained comparable across all groups.

Conclusion: Dual therapies show class-dependent effects on BPV and circadian rhythm; ACEi+CCB most effectively reduces 24-h systolic fluctuations.

双联合降压方案对降低24小时收缩压变异性和改变夜间下降变化的比较效果:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:本回顾性队列研究评估了四种双联合降压方案在24周内对24小时动态血压变异性(BPV)和昼夜节律改变的实际临床效果。方法:对302例原发性高血压成人患者进行平行队列评估:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂+钙通道阻滞剂组(ACEi+CCB, n = 76),血管紧张素受体阻滞剂+噻嗪利尿剂组(ARB+噻嗪,n = 75), β受体阻滞剂+噻嗪组(BB+噻嗪,n = 74),钙通道阻滞剂+ β受体阻滞剂组(CCB+BB, n = 77)。分析24小时收缩压(SBP)标准差(SD)、变异系数(CV)和夜间收缩压比,以评估独立于绝对血压降低的血流动力学变化。结果:虽然所有方案均显著降低了平均血压和24小时动态血压,但与ARB+噻嗪组(-15.1%)、CCB+BB组(-14.4%)和BB+噻嗪组(-4.8%)相比,ACEi+CCB组从基线到第24周的24小时收缩压降低幅度更大(从10.35%±1.25%降至7.45%±0.92%,相对下降幅度为-28.0%)(调整绝对血压降低后p < 0.001)。此外,ACEi+CCB组的连续夜间收缩压比从0.96±0.04显著下降至0.91±0.03 (p < 0.001),优于ARB+噻嗪和BB+噻嗪组。治疗依从性(92%-95%)和总体不良事件发生率(7.1%-9.7%)在所有组中保持可比性。结论:双重治疗对BPV和昼夜节律的影响具有类别依赖性;ACEi+CCB最有效地降低24小时收缩压波动。与ACEi+CCB组合产生最显著的24小时收缩期波动的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书