Enrico Poletti, Omar Alessandro Oliva, Ahmad Hassan, Giuseppe Esposito, Mauro Massussi, Valentina Ardizzone, Baydaroglu Nurcan, Antonella Millin, Vittorio Zuccarelli, Andrea Raffaele Munafò, Jacopo Oreglia, Federico De Marco, Marianna Adamo, Didier Tchetché, Andrea Zuffi
{"title":"Conduction Disturbances and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR With Self-Expanding Devices: The CONNAVIPRO Study.","authors":"Enrico Poletti, Omar Alessandro Oliva, Ahmad Hassan, Giuseppe Esposito, Mauro Massussi, Valentina Ardizzone, Baydaroglu Nurcan, Antonella Millin, Vittorio Zuccarelli, Andrea Raffaele Munafò, Jacopo Oreglia, Federico De Marco, Marianna Adamo, Didier Tchetché, Andrea Zuffi","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Evolut and the Navitor transcatheter heart valves (THVs) represent the most widely used self-expanding implanted valves. Despite a similar implant concept, they markedly differ in design and hemodynamic performance. In both THVs, conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are reported higher than in balloon-expandable devices. Nevertheless, to date, no direct comparative studies have analyzed their real difference rates.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Aim of the present study was to directly compare the self-expanding Evolut PRO+ and Navitor THVs, with specific focus on the incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and post-procedural hemodynamic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CONNAVIPRO registry is an international, multicenter, retrospective study including 880 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with Evolut PRO+ (n = 451) or Navitor (n = 429) between May 2022 and December 2024. The primary endpoint was new PPI within 30 days among pacemaker-naïve patients. Secondary endpoints included technical and device success, transprosthetic gradients, and paravalvular leak (PVL). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedural success was high with both valves (97.6%), and early safety outcomes were comparable. At 30 days, the Navitor group showed a higher PPI rate than Evolut (23.2% vs. 17.6%), reaching statistical significance after IPW adjustment (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17; p = 0.018). Mean transprosthetic gradients were slightly higher with Navitor (8 vs. 7 mmHg; p = 0.002), whereas moderate or greater PVL was less frequent (2.8% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.001). Variables independently associated with PPI were hypertension, and pre-existing right bundle branch block.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both Evolut PRO+ and Navitor THVs provided excellent safety and hemodynamic outcomes. Navitor may be associated with a higher 30-day PPI rate, a lower incidence of moderate or greater PVL, and clinically non-significant higher gradients. These associations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"1630-1639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Evolut and the Navitor transcatheter heart valves (THVs) represent the most widely used self-expanding implanted valves. Despite a similar implant concept, they markedly differ in design and hemodynamic performance. In both THVs, conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are reported higher than in balloon-expandable devices. Nevertheless, to date, no direct comparative studies have analyzed their real difference rates.
Aim: Aim of the present study was to directly compare the self-expanding Evolut PRO+ and Navitor THVs, with specific focus on the incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and post-procedural hemodynamic performance.
Methods: The CONNAVIPRO registry is an international, multicenter, retrospective study including 880 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with Evolut PRO+ (n = 451) or Navitor (n = 429) between May 2022 and December 2024. The primary endpoint was new PPI within 30 days among pacemaker-naïve patients. Secondary endpoints included technical and device success, transprosthetic gradients, and paravalvular leak (PVL). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for baseline differences.
Results: Procedural success was high with both valves (97.6%), and early safety outcomes were comparable. At 30 days, the Navitor group showed a higher PPI rate than Evolut (23.2% vs. 17.6%), reaching statistical significance after IPW adjustment (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17; p = 0.018). Mean transprosthetic gradients were slightly higher with Navitor (8 vs. 7 mmHg; p = 0.002), whereas moderate or greater PVL was less frequent (2.8% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.001). Variables independently associated with PPI were hypertension, and pre-existing right bundle branch block.
Conclusions: Both Evolut PRO+ and Navitor THVs provided excellent safety and hemodynamic outcomes. Navitor may be associated with a higher 30-day PPI rate, a lower incidence of moderate or greater PVL, and clinically non-significant higher gradients. These associations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in prospective studies.
背景:Evolut和Navitor经导管心脏瓣膜(thv)是应用最广泛的自膨胀植入瓣膜。尽管相似的植入概念,它们在设计和血流动力学性能上明显不同。在这两种thv中,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的传导干扰均高于球囊扩张装置。然而,到目前为止,还没有直接的比较研究分析过它们的实际差异率。目的:本研究的目的是直接比较自扩式Evolut PRO+和Navitor thv,特别关注新的永久性起搏器植入(PPI)的发生率和术后血流动力学性能。CONNAVIPRO注册是一项国际、多中心、回顾性研究,包括880名在2022年5月至2024年12月期间连续接受Evolut PRO+ (n = 451)或Navitor (n = 429)治疗的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者。主要终点是pacemaker-naïve患者30天内新的PPI。次要终点包括技术和器械成功、经假体梯度和瓣旁漏(PVL)。应用逆概率加权(IPW)来调整基线差异。结果:两个瓣膜的手术成功率很高(97.6%),早期安全性结果相当。30 d时,Navitor组PPI率高于Evolut组(23.2% vs. 17.6%),经IPW校正后差异有统计学意义(OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17; p = 0.018)。Navitor的平均经假体梯度略高(8 vs. 7 mmHg; p = 0.002),而中度或更高的PVL发生率较低(2.8% vs. 7.7%)。结论:Evolut PRO+和Navitor thv均提供了良好的安全性和血流动力学结果。Navitor可能与较高的30天PPI率、较低的中度或较重度PVL发生率以及临床无显著性的较高梯度相关。这些关联应该被解释为产生假设,并在前瞻性研究中得到证实。