What do laboratories know about the pneumatic tube delivery systems they depend on?

IF 1.8

Biochemia medica Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Epub Date: 2026-08-10 DOI:10.11613/BM.2026.030801

Anushka Jayanetti, Tony Badrick

{"title":"What do laboratories know about the pneumatic tube delivery systems they depend on?","authors":"Anushka Jayanetti, Tony Badrick","doi":"10.11613/BM.2026.030801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) are a key component of many laboratory sample delivery systems. However, they can be a source of preanalytical error, particularly when samples are lost or damaged. The Key Incident Monitoring and Management (KIMMS) program of the Royal College of Pathologists Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) conducted a survey to gather information on the maintenance of these systems.Materials and methods: The categories of questions included general information, service, maintenance and validation of systems, and incident reporting. The responses were compiled and reviewed using Microsoft Forms.Results: The survey found a lack of awareness of servicing and validation records, as well as of the PTS's functionality. Most sites reported incidents with their pneumatic tube systems (37/45, 80%), mainly system failures rather than samples being lost, delayed, or damaged.Conclusions: Greater oversight of laboratories is needed, and relationships with system vendors must be strengthened to ensure quality service.","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"36 3","pages":"030801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13489488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2026.030801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) are a key component of many laboratory sample delivery systems. However, they can be a source of preanalytical error, particularly when samples are lost or damaged. The Key Incident Monitoring and Management (KIMMS) program of the Royal College of Pathologists Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) conducted a survey to gather information on the maintenance of these systems.

Materials and methods: The categories of questions included general information, service, maintenance and validation of systems, and incident reporting. The responses were compiled and reviewed using Microsoft Forms.

Results: The survey found a lack of awareness of servicing and validation records, as well as of the PTS's functionality. Most sites reported incidents with their pneumatic tube systems (37/45, 80%), mainly system failures rather than samples being lost, delayed, or damaged.

Conclusions: Greater oversight of laboratories is needed, and relationships with system vendors must be strengthened to ensure quality service.

查看原文本刊更多论文

实验室对他们所依赖的气动管道输送系统了解多少？

简介：气动管系统（PTS）是许多实验室样品输送系统的关键组成部分。然而，它们可能是分析前误差的来源，特别是当样品丢失或损坏时。澳大拉西亚皇家病理学家质量保证计划（RCPAQAP）的关键事件监测和管理（KIMMS）计划进行了一项调查，以收集有关这些系统维护的信息。材料和方法：问题的类别包括一般信息、服务、系统的维护和验证以及事件报告。这些回复是用微软表单进行编译和审核的。结果：调查发现对服务和验证记录以及PTS的功能缺乏认识。大多数现场报告的事故与他们的气动管系统有关（37/ 45,80 %），主要是系统故障，而不是样品丢失、延迟或损坏。结论：需要对实验室进行更大的监督，并且必须加强与系统供应商的关系以确保服务质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biochemia medica

自引率

0.00%

发文量