[Nurses' perceptions of the integration of patient-reported experience measures and patient-reported outcome measures for care improvement: A multicenter qualitative study].

IF 0.6
Cayetana Ruiz-Zaldibar, Pilar Montes-Muñoz, Mayte Ruano-Sanz, Desiree Cidoncha-López, Sandra Crespo-Hernández, María de la Loma Segarra-Cañamares
{"title":"[Nurses' perceptions of the integration of patient-reported experience measures and patient-reported outcome measures for care improvement: A multicenter qualitative study].","authors":"Cayetana Ruiz-Zaldibar, Pilar Montes-Muñoz, Mayte Ruano-Sanz, Desiree Cidoncha-López, Sandra Crespo-Hernández, María de la Loma Segarra-Cañamares","doi":"10.23938/ASSN.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognized as valuable tools for evaluating healthcare quality. This study aims to explore nurses' perceptions across diverse clinical settings regarding the usefulness of PREMs and PROMs for identifying opportunities to improve care and informing quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Interpretive, exploratory, multicenter qualitative study conducted between November 2025 and February 2026. Five focus groups were held with 32 nurses recruited through purposive sampling from inpatient wards, adult and neonatal intensive care units, emergency departments, operating rooms, and oncology units across four HM hospitals in Madrid. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes emerged: 1) communication, therapeutic relationship, and humanized care as key determinants of patient experience; 2) holistic care, particularly comfort, patient safety, and pain management; 3) clinical information and patient education to reduce uncertainty and improve continuity of care; 4) positive perceptions of PREMs and PROMs despite their limited systematic implementation; 5) organizational constraints, workload, and time pressure as major barriers; and 6) opportunities for innovation through humanization strategies, technology integration, and advanced nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses perceive PREMs and PROMs as valuable resources for improving patient-centered case and supporting quality improvement. However, their integration into routine clinical practice remains limited by organizational and structural barriers. Addressing these challenges may facilitate the systematic use of patient-reported measures to enhance care quality and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":500996,"journal":{"name":"Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognized as valuable tools for evaluating healthcare quality. This study aims to explore nurses' perceptions across diverse clinical settings regarding the usefulness of PREMs and PROMs for identifying opportunities to improve care and informing quality improvement initiatives.

Materials and methods: Interpretive, exploratory, multicenter qualitative study conducted between November 2025 and February 2026. Five focus groups were held with 32 nurses recruited through purposive sampling from inpatient wards, adult and neonatal intensive care units, emergency departments, operating rooms, and oncology units across four HM hospitals in Madrid. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Six themes emerged: 1) communication, therapeutic relationship, and humanized care as key determinants of patient experience; 2) holistic care, particularly comfort, patient safety, and pain management; 3) clinical information and patient education to reduce uncertainty and improve continuity of care; 4) positive perceptions of PREMs and PROMs despite their limited systematic implementation; 5) organizational constraints, workload, and time pressure as major barriers; and 6) opportunities for innovation through humanization strategies, technology integration, and advanced nursing practice.

Conclusions: Nurses perceive PREMs and PROMs as valuable resources for improving patient-centered case and supporting quality improvement. However, their integration into routine clinical practice remains limited by organizational and structural barriers. Addressing these challenges may facilitate the systematic use of patient-reported measures to enhance care quality and patient outcomes.

[护士对整合患者报告经验措施和患者报告结果措施以改善护理的看法:一项多中心定性研究]。
背景:患者报告的体验测量(PREMs)和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)越来越被认为是评估医疗质量的有价值的工具。本研究旨在探讨护士在不同临床环境中对prem和prom的有用性的看法,以确定改善护理和告知质量改进计划的机会。材料与方法:2025年11月至2026年2月进行解释性、探索性、多中心定性研究。通过有目的抽样,从马德里四家HM医院的住院病房、成人和新生儿重症监护病房、急诊科、手术室和肿瘤科招募了32名护士。数据收集采用半结构化访谈指南,并通过归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:出现了六个主题:1)沟通、治疗关系和人性化护理是患者体验的关键决定因素;2)整体护理,特别是舒适、患者安全和疼痛管理;3)临床信息和患者教育,减少不确定性,提高护理的连续性;4)尽管PREMs和prom的系统实施有限,但对其持积极态度;5)组织约束、工作量和时间压力是主要障碍;6)通过人性化策略、技术整合和先进护理实践实现创新的机会。结论:护士认为PREMs和PROMs是改善以患者为中心的病例和支持质量改进的宝贵资源。然而,它们融入常规临床实践仍然受到组织和结构障碍的限制。解决这些挑战可能有助于系统地使用患者报告的措施,以提高护理质量和患者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书