{"title":"Analytical interference by IgM paraprotein causing platform-dependent electrolyte discrepancies: a case-based laboratory investigation.","authors":"Sheng Wang, Xiaoyong Duan, Yulin Zou, Jianxiong Gui","doi":"10.11613/BM.2026.030901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate measurement of serum electrolytes and calcium is essential for clinical management; however, monoclonal immunoglobulins, particularly IgM paraproteins, may cause misleading analytical interference. We report the case of an 85-year-old man admitted for low back pain whose serum sample showed marked inter-platform discordance in sodium and total calcium results. The Hitachi platform reported a \"hypercalcemic crisis\" (total calcium 4.95 mmol/L) and severe hyponatremia (125 mmol/L), whereas the Beckman Coulter AU platform showed only mildly elevated total calcium (2.89 mmol/L) and milder hyponatremia (133 mmol/L). This corresponded to a 71.3% difference in total calcium, despite both platforms using the Arsenazo III method. Direct ion-selective electrode measurements excluded true hyponatremia and hypercalcemia. Dilution studies, polyethylene glycol precipitation, reaction-curve inspection, and simulation experiments confirmed that IgM-related precipitation and optical scattering were the underlying mechanisms. Specifically, platform-specific mixing dynamics determined the magnitude of interference. Recognition of biochemical-clinical discordance and targeted method comparison prompted hematological evaluation and led to a diagnosis of Waldenström macroglobulinemia. This case highlights that unexplained analytical discrepancies may delay recognition of underlying disease if analytical interference is not appropriately investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"36 3","pages":"030901"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13489491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2026.030901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate measurement of serum electrolytes and calcium is essential for clinical management; however, monoclonal immunoglobulins, particularly IgM paraproteins, may cause misleading analytical interference. We report the case of an 85-year-old man admitted for low back pain whose serum sample showed marked inter-platform discordance in sodium and total calcium results. The Hitachi platform reported a "hypercalcemic crisis" (total calcium 4.95 mmol/L) and severe hyponatremia (125 mmol/L), whereas the Beckman Coulter AU platform showed only mildly elevated total calcium (2.89 mmol/L) and milder hyponatremia (133 mmol/L). This corresponded to a 71.3% difference in total calcium, despite both platforms using the Arsenazo III method. Direct ion-selective electrode measurements excluded true hyponatremia and hypercalcemia. Dilution studies, polyethylene glycol precipitation, reaction-curve inspection, and simulation experiments confirmed that IgM-related precipitation and optical scattering were the underlying mechanisms. Specifically, platform-specific mixing dynamics determined the magnitude of interference. Recognition of biochemical-clinical discordance and targeted method comparison prompted hematological evaluation and led to a diagnosis of Waldenström macroglobulinemia. This case highlights that unexplained analytical discrepancies may delay recognition of underlying disease if analytical interference is not appropriately investigated.