Impact of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Resin Cement on the Esthetic Outcomes of High-Translucency Monolithic Zirconia.

IF 1.8
Pat Prasongpholchai, Mali Palanuwech
{"title":"Impact of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Resin Cement on the Esthetic Outcomes of High-Translucency Monolithic Zirconia.","authors":"Pat Prasongpholchai, Mali Palanuwech","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oxygen plasma treatment improves retention compared with no surface treatment of titanium; however, evidence on its esthetic effects after treatment is lacking. This study investigated the effects of oxygen plasma treatment and clear resin cement type on color differences (ΔE) in high-translucency monolithic zirconia (HTMZ).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 1.0-mm-thick A2-shade HTMZ specimen group (n = 7) was evaluated using two types of clear resin cement (n = 7 each) in combination with six Ti groups (n = 7 each): non-surface-treated Ti (T), anodized Ti (A), polished Ti (P), polished Ti followed by Oxygen plasma treatment (PX), polished Ti followed by anodization (PA), and polished and anodized Ti followed by Oxygen plasma treatment (PAX). The ΔE1, ΔE2, and ΔE3 values were calculated to test the first, second, and third hypotheses, respectively. ΔE1 represented the color difference between Zir + Ti and Zir + A2D-shade composite resin, ΔE2 represented the color difference between Zir + cement + Ti and Zir + cement + A2D-shade composite resin, and ΔE3 represented the color difference between Zir + cement + Ti and Zir + Ti. All specimens were measured using a spectrophotometer, and the ΔE values were calculated relative to the corresponding control group. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by post hoc tests (P = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All parameters significantly influenced ΔE (P < .05). Oxygen plasma treatment did not influence baseline color differences (ΔE1). However, the interaction between oxygen plasma treatment and cement type significantly affected post-cementation color changes (ΔE2 and ΔE3). The use of clear resin cement marginally reduced the color difference values across all titanium groups. All ΔE1 and ΔE2 values exceeded the clinically acceptable threshold (ΔE > 1.8), whereas all ΔE3 values remained below the perceptibility threshold (ΔE < 0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oxygen plasma treatment did not alter ΔE, and both clear resin cement types had negligible effects that remained below the perceptibility threshold across all titanium substrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Oxygen plasma treatment improves retention compared with no surface treatment of titanium; however, evidence on its esthetic effects after treatment is lacking. This study investigated the effects of oxygen plasma treatment and clear resin cement type on color differences (ΔE) in high-translucency monolithic zirconia (HTMZ).

Materials and methods: A 1.0-mm-thick A2-shade HTMZ specimen group (n = 7) was evaluated using two types of clear resin cement (n = 7 each) in combination with six Ti groups (n = 7 each): non-surface-treated Ti (T), anodized Ti (A), polished Ti (P), polished Ti followed by Oxygen plasma treatment (PX), polished Ti followed by anodization (PA), and polished and anodized Ti followed by Oxygen plasma treatment (PAX). The ΔE1, ΔE2, and ΔE3 values were calculated to test the first, second, and third hypotheses, respectively. ΔE1 represented the color difference between Zir + Ti and Zir + A2D-shade composite resin, ΔE2 represented the color difference between Zir + cement + Ti and Zir + cement + A2D-shade composite resin, and ΔE3 represented the color difference between Zir + cement + Ti and Zir + Ti. All specimens were measured using a spectrophotometer, and the ΔE values were calculated relative to the corresponding control group. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by post hoc tests (P = .05).

Results: All parameters significantly influenced ΔE (P < .05). Oxygen plasma treatment did not influence baseline color differences (ΔE1). However, the interaction between oxygen plasma treatment and cement type significantly affected post-cementation color changes (ΔE2 and ΔE3). The use of clear resin cement marginally reduced the color difference values across all titanium groups. All ΔE1 and ΔE2 values exceeded the clinically acceptable threshold (ΔE > 1.8), whereas all ΔE3 values remained below the perceptibility threshold (ΔE < 0.8).

Conclusion: Oxygen plasma treatment did not alter ΔE, and both clear resin cement types had negligible effects that remained below the perceptibility threshold across all titanium substrates.

氧等离子体处理和树脂水泥对高半透明单片氧化锆美学效果的影响。
目的:与不进行表面处理相比,氧等离子体处理可提高钛的滞留性;然而,关于其治疗后的美学效果的证据缺乏。本研究考察了氧等离子体处理和透明树脂水泥类型对高半透明单片氧化锆(HTMZ)色差的影响(ΔE)。材料和方法:采用两种透明树脂水泥(各n = 7)和六组(各n = 7):未表面处理的Ti (T)、阳极氧化的Ti (A)、抛光的Ti (P)、抛光后的Ti -氧等离子体处理(PX)、抛光后的Ti -阳极氧化(PA)和抛光后的Ti -氧等离子体处理(PAX),对1.0 mm厚的A2-shade HTMZ试样组(n = 7)进行评估。分别计算ΔE1、ΔE2和ΔE3值来检验第一、第二和第三个假设。ΔE1表示Zir + Ti与Zir + A2D-shade复合树脂的色差,ΔE2表示Zir +水泥+ Ti与Zir +水泥+ A2D-shade复合树脂的色差,ΔE3表示Zir +水泥+ Ti与Zir + Ti的色差。用分光光度计测量所有标本,并计算相对于相应对照组的ΔE值。所得资料采用方差分析和事后检验进行统计学分析(P = 0.05)。结果:各参数对ΔE均有显著影响(P < 0.05)。氧等离子体治疗不影响基线色差(ΔE1)。然而,氧等离子体处理和水泥类型之间的相互作用显著影响胶结后的颜色变化(ΔE2和ΔE3)。透明树脂水泥的使用略微降低了所有钛组的色差值。所有ΔE1和ΔE2值均超过临床可接受阈值(ΔE > 1.8),而所有ΔE3值仍低于感知阈值(ΔE < 0.8)。结论:氧等离子体处理没有改变ΔE,两种透明树脂水泥类型的影响可以忽略不计,仍然低于所有钛基质的感知阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书