Effect of Etching Protocols on the Bonding Performance of a HEMA-Free Two-Step Universal Adhesive to Caries-Affected Dentin.

IF 2.7
Melike Bilce, Fatih Bedir, Günes Bulut Eyüboglu, Tugba Serin Kalay, Muhammet Karadas
{"title":"Effect of Etching Protocols on the Bonding Performance of a HEMA-Free Two-Step Universal Adhesive to Caries-Affected Dentin.","authors":"Melike Bilce, Fatih Bedir, Günes Bulut Eyüboglu, Tugba Serin Kalay, Muhammet Karadas","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.c_2785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the bonding performance of a two-step universal adhesive applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch protocols to caries-affected dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Mid-coronal dentin surfaces were obtained from extracted human molars and assigned to either sound or caries-affected dentin groups. Specimens were randomly distributed into 12 subgroups (n = 10) based on adhesive type (G2-Bond Universal, Gluma Bond Universal, Clearfil S3 Bond Universal), bonding protocol (self-etch or etch-and-rinse), and evaluation period (24 h or aging). Resin composite blocks were fabricated and subjected to shear bond strength testing after 24 h or 10,000 thermocycles. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy was employed to measure the degree of conversion of each adhesive. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Weibull analysis, and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adhesive type and bonding protocol significantly influenced bond strength (p 0.001), whereas substrate condition and thermocycling had no significant impact (p > 0.05). After aging, Clearfil S3 Bond Universal in the self-etch protocol presented considerably lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin compared with G2-Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal, with no significant difference between the latter two. After aging, Gluma Bond Universal and G2-Bond Universal revealed significantly greater bond strength to caries-affected dentin when applied in the self-etch protocol than in the etch-and-rinse protocol. No significant differences were detected among adhesives when the etch-and-rinse protocol was used, regardless of testing time and substrate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phosphoric acid pre-etching negatively affected the bonding performance of Gluma Bond Universal and G2-Bond Universal to caries-affected dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"28 ","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13483063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_2785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the bonding performance of a two-step universal adhesive applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch protocols to caries-affected dentin.

Methods and materials: Mid-coronal dentin surfaces were obtained from extracted human molars and assigned to either sound or caries-affected dentin groups. Specimens were randomly distributed into 12 subgroups (n = 10) based on adhesive type (G2-Bond Universal, Gluma Bond Universal, Clearfil S3 Bond Universal), bonding protocol (self-etch or etch-and-rinse), and evaluation period (24 h or aging). Resin composite blocks were fabricated and subjected to shear bond strength testing after 24 h or 10,000 thermocycles. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy was employed to measure the degree of conversion of each adhesive. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Weibull analysis, and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05).

Results: Adhesive type and bonding protocol significantly influenced bond strength (p 0.001), whereas substrate condition and thermocycling had no significant impact (p > 0.05). After aging, Clearfil S3 Bond Universal in the self-etch protocol presented considerably lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin compared with G2-Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal, with no significant difference between the latter two. After aging, Gluma Bond Universal and G2-Bond Universal revealed significantly greater bond strength to caries-affected dentin when applied in the self-etch protocol than in the etch-and-rinse protocol. No significant differences were detected among adhesives when the etch-and-rinse protocol was used, regardless of testing time and substrate.

Conclusions: Phosphoric acid pre-etching negatively affected the bonding performance of Gluma Bond Universal and G2-Bond Universal to caries-affected dentin.

蚀刻方式对无hema二步万能胶与龋病牙本质粘接性能的影响。
目的:评价两步通用胶粘剂在牙本质腐蚀-冲洗和自腐蚀方案中的粘接性能。方法和材料:从拔除的人磨牙中获得中冠牙本质表面,并将其分为健全组和患龋组。根据粘接类型(G2-Bond Universal、Gluma Bond Universal、Clearfil S3 Bond Universal)、粘接方式(自蚀刻或蚀刻-冲洗)和评估周期(24 h或老化),将标本随机分为12个亚组(n = 10)。制作树脂复合块,并在24 h或10,000热循环后进行剪切粘结强度测试。采用傅里叶变换红外光谱法测定各胶粘剂的转化程度。统计分析采用方差分析、威布尔分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验(α = 0.05)。结果:粘结剂类型和粘结方式对粘结强度有显著影响(p < 0.001),而基体条件和热循环对粘结强度无显著影响(p < 0.05)。老化后,自蚀方案中的Clearfil S3 Bond Universal与受龋病影响的牙本质的结合强度明显低于G2-Bond Universal和Gluma Bond Universal,两者之间无显著差异。老化后,Gluma Bond Universal和G2-Bond Universal在自蚀刻方案中与受龋影响的牙本质的结合强度明显高于蚀刻-冲洗方案。当使用蚀刻-漂洗方案时,无论测试时间和基材如何,都没有检测到粘合剂之间的显着差异。结论:磷酸预蚀刻对Gluma Bond Universal和G2-Bond Universal对患龋牙本质的粘接性能有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书