When to shunt and when to aspirate? Long-term outcomes from a large stereotactic cohort of cystic craniopharyngiomas.

IF 2.7 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2026-08-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2026.106265
Biyan Nathanael Harapan, Antonia Clarissa Wehn, Sabrina V Kirchleitner, Moritz Ueberschaer, Mathias Kunz, Jun Thorsteinsdottir, Florian Ringel, Michael Schmutzer-Sondergeld
{"title":"When to shunt and when to aspirate? Long-term outcomes from a large stereotactic cohort of cystic craniopharyngiomas.","authors":"Biyan Nathanael Harapan, Antonia Clarissa Wehn, Sabrina V Kirchleitner, Moritz Ueberschaer, Mathias Kunz, Jun Thorsteinsdottir, Florian Ringel, Michael Schmutzer-Sondergeld","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2026.106265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stereotactic surgery of predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas (CC) is a minimally invasive alternative to microsurgical or endoscopic resection. Both cyst aspiration (CA) and internal cyst shunting (CS) have been proposed as stereotactic treatment strategies, yet comparative data remain limited.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do CA and CS differ in clinical, radiological, visual, endocrine, and recurrence outcomes in predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of patients treated between 2000 and 2025 was analyzed. Volumetric MRI was performed preoperatively and at ≤6 weeks, 4-6 months, and 9-12 months postoperatively. Clinical, radiological, visual, endocrine, and recurrence outcomes were evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients were included (15 CA, 27 CS). Baseline characteristics were largely comparable, although optic nerve sheath dilation was more frequent in the CS group. Preoperative cyst volumes were similar (14.2 ± 10.3 cm<sup>3</sup> vs. 16.5 ± 9.7 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.5), as were final postoperative volumes (3.2 ± 3.4 cm<sup>3</sup> vs. 4.2 ± 5.9 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.6). Both techniques achieved significant and durable cyst reduction (all p < 0.001). Visual outcomes favored CS (85.2% vs. 53.3% without deficit; p = 0.02), whereas corticotropic (p = 0.02), thyreotropic insufficiency, and diabetes insipidus (both p = 0.03) were more frequent. Recurrence correlated with preoperative cyst volume (p = 0.008), independent of treatment modality.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Both techniques provide effective cyst decompression. CS may improve visual outcomes but appears associated with higher endocrine risk. Findings support individualized treatment selection and warrant prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"6 ","pages":"106265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2026.106265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stereotactic surgery of predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas (CC) is a minimally invasive alternative to microsurgical or endoscopic resection. Both cyst aspiration (CA) and internal cyst shunting (CS) have been proposed as stereotactic treatment strategies, yet comparative data remain limited.

Research question: Do CA and CS differ in clinical, radiological, visual, endocrine, and recurrence outcomes in predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas?

Material and methods: A retrospective cohort of patients treated between 2000 and 2025 was analyzed. Volumetric MRI was performed preoperatively and at ≤6 weeks, 4-6 months, and 9-12 months postoperatively. Clinical, radiological, visual, endocrine, and recurrence outcomes were evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses.

Results: A total of 42 patients were included (15 CA, 27 CS). Baseline characteristics were largely comparable, although optic nerve sheath dilation was more frequent in the CS group. Preoperative cyst volumes were similar (14.2 ± 10.3 cm3 vs. 16.5 ± 9.7 cm3; p = 0.5), as were final postoperative volumes (3.2 ± 3.4 cm3 vs. 4.2 ± 5.9 cm3; p = 0.6). Both techniques achieved significant and durable cyst reduction (all p < 0.001). Visual outcomes favored CS (85.2% vs. 53.3% without deficit; p = 0.02), whereas corticotropic (p = 0.02), thyreotropic insufficiency, and diabetes insipidus (both p = 0.03) were more frequent. Recurrence correlated with preoperative cyst volume (p = 0.008), independent of treatment modality.

Discussion and conclusion: Both techniques provide effective cyst decompression. CS may improve visual outcomes but appears associated with higher endocrine risk. Findings support individualized treatment selection and warrant prospective validation.

什么时候分流,什么时候吸气?大型立体定向队列囊性颅咽管瘤的长期预后。
立体定向手术治疗主要是囊性颅咽管瘤(CC),是一种微创手术或内镜切除的替代方法。囊肿抽吸(CA)和内部囊肿分流(CS)都被提出作为立体定向治疗策略,但比较数据仍然有限。研究问题:在以囊性为主的颅咽管瘤中,CA和CS在临床、放射学、视觉、内分泌和复发结果上有区别吗?材料和方法:对2000年至2025年间接受治疗的患者进行回顾性队列分析。术前、术后≤6周、4-6个月、9-12个月分别行体积MRI检查。临床、放射学、视觉、内分泌和复发结果通过单因素和多因素分析进行评估。结果:共纳入42例患者(CA 15例,CS 27例)。基线特征在很大程度上是相似的,尽管视神经鞘扩张在CS组更频繁。术前囊肿体积相似(14.2 ±10.3  16.5立方厘米和 ±9.7  立方厘米;p = 0.5),最后是术后卷(3.2 ±3.4  4.2立方厘米和 ±5.9  立方厘米;p = 0.6)。两种技术都实现了显著且持久的囊肿复位(均p )。讨论和结论:两种技术都提供了有效的囊肿减压。CS可能改善视力,但似乎与较高的内分泌风险相关。研究结果支持个体化治疗选择,并需要前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书