Nuclear error phenotypes at the first mitosis predict cleavage-stage outcomes but not blastocyst competence.

IF 3.1 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2026-08-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2026.1905720
Emma Adolfsson, Amanda Stenberg, Juliane Baumgart
{"title":"Nuclear error phenotypes at the first mitosis predict cleavage-stage outcomes but not blastocyst competence.","authors":"Emma Adolfsson, Amanda Stenberg, Juliane Baumgart","doi":"10.3389/frph.2026.1905720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nuclear errors (NE) observed at the two-cell stage reflect early mitotic disturbances, but their clinical relevance for embryo implantation and live birth remains un-clear. We investigated whether nuclear status at the two-cell stage predicts pregnancy and live birth outcomes following cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 3,793 single embryo transfers with clinical outcomes performed at a university-affiliated reproductive medicine centre. Embryos were retrospectively assessed at the two-cell stage and classified as normal or exhibiting nuclear errors, further stratified by the number of affected blastomeres and by phenotype (multinucleation, micronucleation, split nuclei, or mixed errors). Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome; pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcomes. Associations were evaluated using contingency analyses, regression models of nuclear error occurrence, and mixed-effects logistic regression analyses of clinical outcomes adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, fertilisation method, and patient-level clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NE occurred in 24% of transferred embryos and were more frequent after ICSI than IVF (adjusted OR 1.74). In cleavage-stage transfers, NE were associated with reduced LBR compared with embryos without NE (23.2% vs. 34.8%). The clinical outcomes decreased with increased numbers of affected blastomeres. Micronucleation and split nuclei showed the poorest outcomes and remained adversely associated with reproductive outcomes after adjustment, whereas multinucleation was not detrimental. No association between NE and outcomes was observed after blastocyst transfers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nuclear error phenotypes at the two-cell stage provided prognostic information relevant for cleavage-stage embryo transfer but had limited influence for blastocyst selection. Outcome differences associated with early nuclear abnormalities were no longer detectable among transferred blastocysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"8 ","pages":"1905720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1905720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nuclear errors (NE) observed at the two-cell stage reflect early mitotic disturbances, but their clinical relevance for embryo implantation and live birth remains un-clear. We investigated whether nuclear status at the two-cell stage predicts pregnancy and live birth outcomes following cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfer.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 3,793 single embryo transfers with clinical outcomes performed at a university-affiliated reproductive medicine centre. Embryos were retrospectively assessed at the two-cell stage and classified as normal or exhibiting nuclear errors, further stratified by the number of affected blastomeres and by phenotype (multinucleation, micronucleation, split nuclei, or mixed errors). Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome; pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcomes. Associations were evaluated using contingency analyses, regression models of nuclear error occurrence, and mixed-effects logistic regression analyses of clinical outcomes adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, fertilisation method, and patient-level clustering.

Results: NE occurred in 24% of transferred embryos and were more frequent after ICSI than IVF (adjusted OR 1.74). In cleavage-stage transfers, NE were associated with reduced LBR compared with embryos without NE (23.2% vs. 34.8%). The clinical outcomes decreased with increased numbers of affected blastomeres. Micronucleation and split nuclei showed the poorest outcomes and remained adversely associated with reproductive outcomes after adjustment, whereas multinucleation was not detrimental. No association between NE and outcomes was observed after blastocyst transfers.

Conclusions: Nuclear error phenotypes at the two-cell stage provided prognostic information relevant for cleavage-stage embryo transfer but had limited influence for blastocyst selection. Outcome differences associated with early nuclear abnormalities were no longer detectable among transferred blastocysts.

第一次有丝分裂时的核错误表型预测卵裂期结果,但不能预测囊胚能力。
背景:在两细胞阶段观察到的核错误(NE)反映了早期有丝分裂障碍,但它们与胚胎着床和活产的临床相关性尚不清楚。我们研究了两细胞期的核状态是否能预测卵裂期和囊胚移植后的妊娠和活产结局。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括3793例单胚胎移植,临床结果在一所大学附属生殖医学中心进行。在双细胞阶段对胚胎进行回顾性评估,并将其分为正常或出现核错误,根据受影响的卵裂球数量和表型(多核、微核、分裂核或混合错误)进一步分层。活产率(LBR)是主要观察指标;妊娠率和临床妊娠率是次要结局。使用偶然性分析、核错误发生的回归模型和混合效应logistic回归分析对临床结果进行评估,调整了母亲年龄、父亲年龄、受精方法和患者水平聚类。结果:NE在移植胚胎中的发生率为24%,ICSI比IVF更常见(调整OR 1.74)。在卵裂期移植中,与不含NE的胚胎相比,NE与LBR降低相关(23.2% vs. 34.8%)。临床结果随着受累卵裂球数量的增加而下降。微核和分裂核显示出最差的结果,并且在调整后仍然与生殖结果负相关,而多核则没有损害。在囊胚移植后,未观察到NE与预后之间的关联。结论:双细胞期的核错误表型提供了与卵裂期胚胎移植相关的预后信息,但对囊胚选择的影响有限。在移植的囊胚中,与早期核异常相关的结果差异不再被检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书