Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2026-08-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1162/IMAG.a.1332
Kazuki Yoshida, Ryuji Saito, Ryota Hayashi, Seiichi Watanabe, Hiroki Okada
{"title":"Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.","authors":"Kazuki Yoshida, Ryuji Saito, Ryota Hayashi, Seiichi Watanabe, Hiroki Okada","doi":"10.1162/IMAG.a.1332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effort-based decision making relies on cost-benefit computations that require individuals to evaluate expected rewards against the effort needed to obtain them. However, the temporal dynamics underlying the neural processing of reward and effort, as well as the influence of metacognitive ability on this process, remain unclear. The present study investigated these dynamics by recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data while participants performed an effort-based decision-making task and by assessing their metacognitive ability. Decoding analyses of the EEG data revealed that neural representations of effort-avoidance decisions emerged early (approximately 260 ms after stimulus onset) and remained stable over time. Crucially, representational similarity analysis showed that the brain processes reward information before effort information. Although both types of information were primarily represented in parietal electrodes, effort processing engaged a broader network that also included frontal regions. Behaviorally, higher metacognitive ability was associated with better task performance and reduced sensitivity to immediate rewards. These findings suggest a sequential decision-making process in which individuals first evaluate potential rewards and subsequently integrate information about the required effort when deciding whether to avoid effort. Furthermore, higher metacognitive ability appears to buffer against immediate reward impulses, thereby promoting long-term goal-directed behavior. Overall, this study provides direct neural evidence for the temporal dynamics of cost-benefit computation and highlights the critical role of metacognition in effort-based decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73341,"journal":{"name":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"4 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13479346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.1332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effort-based decision making relies on cost-benefit computations that require individuals to evaluate expected rewards against the effort needed to obtain them. However, the temporal dynamics underlying the neural processing of reward and effort, as well as the influence of metacognitive ability on this process, remain unclear. The present study investigated these dynamics by recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data while participants performed an effort-based decision-making task and by assessing their metacognitive ability. Decoding analyses of the EEG data revealed that neural representations of effort-avoidance decisions emerged early (approximately 260 ms after stimulus onset) and remained stable over time. Crucially, representational similarity analysis showed that the brain processes reward information before effort information. Although both types of information were primarily represented in parietal electrodes, effort processing engaged a broader network that also included frontal regions. Behaviorally, higher metacognitive ability was associated with better task performance and reduced sensitivity to immediate rewards. These findings suggest a sequential decision-making process in which individuals first evaluate potential rewards and subsequently integrate information about the required effort when deciding whether to avoid effort. Furthermore, higher metacognitive ability appears to buffer against immediate reward impulses, thereby promoting long-term goal-directed behavior. Overall, this study provides direct neural evidence for the temporal dynamics of cost-benefit computation and highlights the critical role of metacognition in effort-based decision making.

努力回避背后的决策过程及其与元认知的关系。
基于努力的决策依赖于成本效益计算,它要求个体根据获得它们所需的努力来评估预期回报。然而,奖励和努力的神经处理的时间动态,以及元认知能力对这一过程的影响,仍然不清楚。本研究通过记录参与者在执行基于努力的决策任务时的脑电图(EEG)数据和评估他们的元认知能力来研究这些动态。对脑电图数据的解码分析显示,努力-回避决策的神经表征出现得较早(大约在刺激开始后260毫秒),并随着时间的推移保持稳定。至关重要的是,表征相似性分析表明,大脑在处理努力信息之前处理奖励信息。尽管这两种类型的信息主要在顶叶电极上表现出来,但努力处理涉及到一个更广泛的网络,包括额叶区域。在行为上,较高的元认知能力与较好的任务表现和较低的对即时奖励的敏感性有关。这些发现表明了一个连续的决策过程,在这个过程中,个体首先评估潜在的回报,然后在决定是否避免努力时整合有关所需努力的信息。此外,较高的元认知能力似乎可以缓冲即时奖励冲动,从而促进长期目标导向的行为。总的来说,本研究为成本-收益计算的时间动态提供了直接的神经证据,并强调了元认知在基于努力的决策中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书