Preconception care utilisation among women of reproductive age in Ghana: using Andersen's behavioural model.

IF 3.1 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2026-08-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2026.1874979
Amidu Alhassan, Boahemaa Adu Otchere, Godswill Sedinam Lanyo, Frederick Acheampong Nimo, Mildred Awinpiini Asore, Justice Enock Kagbo, Bernard Nabe, Edward Odoom, William Akoto-Buabeng, Jerry John Ouner, Mustapha Amoadu, Patience Fakornam Doe
{"title":"Preconception care utilisation among women of reproductive age in Ghana: using Andersen's behavioural model.","authors":"Amidu Alhassan, Boahemaa Adu Otchere, Godswill Sedinam Lanyo, Frederick Acheampong Nimo, Mildred Awinpiini Asore, Justice Enock Kagbo, Bernard Nabe, Edward Odoom, William Akoto-Buabeng, Jerry John Ouner, Mustapha Amoadu, Patience Fakornam Doe","doi":"10.3389/frph.2026.1874979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preconception care is an essential reproductive health intervention aimed at reducing preventable maternal and neonatal risks. Despite its significance, utilisation in low- and middle-income settings remains low. This study examined determinants of PCC utilisation among women of reproductive age in Ghana, applying Andersen's Behavioural Model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was used, involving 464 women aged 15-49 years in the Koforidua Municipality. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analysed with descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and hierarchical logistic regression using Jamovi version 2.7.23.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a PCC utilisation rate of 69.4%. Younger women were less likely to use PCC, with those aged 21-25 years (AOR = 0.03; <i>p</i> = 0.024) to 36-40 years (AOR = 0.01; <i>p</i> = 0.005) showing lower odds compared with women under 20 years. Ethnicity strongly influenced utilisation, with Akan (AOR = 6.94; <i>p</i> < 0.001), Ewe (AOR = 5.65; <i>p</i> = 0.007), and Ga (AOR = 5.10; <i>p</i> = 0.048) women having higher odds. Women with no formal education were less likely to utilise PCC (AOR = 0.09; <i>p</i> = 0.049), while those receiving counselling (AOR = 5.15; <i>p</i> < 0.001) or exposed to radio campaigns (AOR = 3.30; <i>p</i> = 0.003) had increased odds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCC utilisation in Ghana was moderate and associated with sociodemographic, informational, and health-system factors. Strengthening provider counselling, community-based health education, and consideration of PCC within national reproductive health financing strategies may help improve uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"8 ","pages":"1874979"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13487740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1874979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preconception care is an essential reproductive health intervention aimed at reducing preventable maternal and neonatal risks. Despite its significance, utilisation in low- and middle-income settings remains low. This study examined determinants of PCC utilisation among women of reproductive age in Ghana, applying Andersen's Behavioural Model.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used, involving 464 women aged 15-49 years in the Koforidua Municipality. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analysed with descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and hierarchical logistic regression using Jamovi version 2.7.23.

Results: The study found a PCC utilisation rate of 69.4%. Younger women were less likely to use PCC, with those aged 21-25 years (AOR = 0.03; p = 0.024) to 36-40 years (AOR = 0.01; p = 0.005) showing lower odds compared with women under 20 years. Ethnicity strongly influenced utilisation, with Akan (AOR = 6.94; p < 0.001), Ewe (AOR = 5.65; p = 0.007), and Ga (AOR = 5.10; p = 0.048) women having higher odds. Women with no formal education were less likely to utilise PCC (AOR = 0.09; p = 0.049), while those receiving counselling (AOR = 5.15; p < 0.001) or exposed to radio campaigns (AOR = 3.30; p = 0.003) had increased odds.

Conclusion: PCC utilisation in Ghana was moderate and associated with sociodemographic, informational, and health-system factors. Strengthening provider counselling, community-based health education, and consideration of PCC within national reproductive health financing strategies may help improve uptake.

加纳育龄妇女孕前护理的利用:使用安徒生的行为模型。
背景:孕前护理是一项重要的生殖健康干预措施,旨在减少可预防的孕产妇和新生儿风险。尽管具有重要意义,但在低收入和中等收入环境中的利用率仍然很低。本研究考察了加纳育龄妇女PCC利用的决定因素,应用安徒生的行为模型。方法:采用描述性横断面设计,涉及科福里杜瓦市464名年龄在15-49岁的妇女。采用结构化问卷收集数据,使用Jamovi 2.7.23版本进行描述性统计、卡方检验和分层逻辑回归分析。结果:研究发现PCC的使用率为69.4%。年轻女性使用PCC的可能性较低,21-25岁(AOR = 0.03; p = 0.024)至36-40岁(AOR = 0.01; p = 0.005)的女性与20岁以下女性相比,使用PCC的可能性较低。种族对使用率有很大影响,阿坎(AOR = 6.94; p = 0.007)和Ga (AOR = 5.10; p = 0.048)妇女的使用率更高。未接受过正规教育的妇女使用PCC的可能性较低(AOR = 0.09; p = 0.049),而接受过咨询的妇女(AOR = 5.15; p = 0.003)的可能性增加。结论:加纳PCC的使用率中等,与社会人口、信息和卫生系统因素有关。加强提供者咨询、以社区为基础的健康教育以及在国家生殖健康筹资战略中考虑PCC可能有助于提高接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书