Coping strategies of neurosurgeons in response to major surgical complications: A nationwide questionnaire assessment in Germany.

IF 2.7 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2026-08-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2026.106258
Lisa Schock, Matthias Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie Mehdorn, Mathias Wirth, Philipp Dammann, Ulrich Sure, Laurèl Rauschenbach
{"title":"Coping strategies of neurosurgeons in response to major surgical complications: A nationwide questionnaire assessment in Germany.","authors":"Lisa Schock, Matthias Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie Mehdorn, Mathias Wirth, Philipp Dammann, Ulrich Sure, Laurèl Rauschenbach","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2026.106258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to explore the emotional and psychological impact of major surgical complications on neurosurgeons in Germany, focusing on identifying coping strategies, perceived barriers to support, and the influence of institutional culture - particularly in the context of the \"second victim\" phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do neurosurgeons in Germany handle major complications, and which barriers limit access to psychological support?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a nationwide, anonymous online survey was conducted among neurosurgeons working at university departments across Germany. The survey included 18 items assessing demographics, exposure to high-risk procedures, emotional responses to Clavien-Dindo Grade IV/V complications, coping mechanisms, and access to institutional support. Data from 110 completed questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty percent of participants reported experiencing a major complication, with 60% still being emotionally affected. High levels of guilt and self-doubt were common. The most frequent coping strategies were proactive behavior (62.4%), rumination (57.8%) and seeking social support (60.6%). Only 26.4% reported to have had access to formal psychological support - although 82.7% of those without access considered it necessary. Maladaptive coping was more prevalent in low-tolerance error cultures, and early-career surgeons were more likely to externalize blame.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Major complications considerably impact neurosurgeons' mental health. Yet, institutional support remains insufficient. The findings call for mandatory, confidential psychological support, structured debriefings, and a cultural shift toward non-punitive, learning-oriented environments, supported by medical ethics, as a key instrument of cultural change to safeguard both surgeons' well-being and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"6 ","pages":"106258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13485496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2026.106258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the emotional and psychological impact of major surgical complications on neurosurgeons in Germany, focusing on identifying coping strategies, perceived barriers to support, and the influence of institutional culture - particularly in the context of the "second victim" phenomenon.

Research question: How do neurosurgeons in Germany handle major complications, and which barriers limit access to psychological support?

Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, a nationwide, anonymous online survey was conducted among neurosurgeons working at university departments across Germany. The survey included 18 items assessing demographics, exposure to high-risk procedures, emotional responses to Clavien-Dindo Grade IV/V complications, coping mechanisms, and access to institutional support. Data from 110 completed questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Eighty percent of participants reported experiencing a major complication, with 60% still being emotionally affected. High levels of guilt and self-doubt were common. The most frequent coping strategies were proactive behavior (62.4%), rumination (57.8%) and seeking social support (60.6%). Only 26.4% reported to have had access to formal psychological support - although 82.7% of those without access considered it necessary. Maladaptive coping was more prevalent in low-tolerance error cultures, and early-career surgeons were more likely to externalize blame.

Discussion and conclusion: Major complications considerably impact neurosurgeons' mental health. Yet, institutional support remains insufficient. The findings call for mandatory, confidential psychological support, structured debriefings, and a cultural shift toward non-punitive, learning-oriented environments, supported by medical ethics, as a key instrument of cultural change to safeguard both surgeons' well-being and patient safety.

神经外科医生应对重大手术并发症的策略:一项德国全国性问卷评估。
本研究旨在探讨重大手术并发症对德国神经外科医生的情绪和心理影响,重点是确定应对策略,感知到的支持障碍,以及制度文化的影响-特别是在“第二受害者”现象的背景下。研究问题:德国的神经外科医生如何处理主要并发症,哪些障碍限制了获得心理支持?材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,在德国各大学院系工作的神经外科医生中进行了一项全国性的匿名在线调查。该调查包括18个项目,评估人口统计、高风险手术暴露、对Clavien-Dindo IV/V级并发症的情绪反应、应对机制和获得机构支持的情况。采用描述性统计方法对110份问卷的数据进行分析。结果:80%的参与者报告经历了严重的并发症,60%的人仍然受到情绪影响。高度的内疚和自我怀疑是很常见的。最常见的应对策略是主动行为(62.4%)、反思(57.8%)和寻求社会支持(60.6%)。据报告,只有26.4%的人获得了正式的心理支持,尽管82.7%的人认为这是必要的。适应不良的应对在低容忍度的错误文化中更为普遍,早期职业外科医生更有可能将责任外化。讨论与结论:重大并发症严重影响神经外科医生的心理健康。然而,机构支持仍然不足。研究结果呼吁强制性的、保密的心理支持、结构化的情况汇报,以及在医学伦理的支持下,向非惩罚性的、以学习为导向的环境转变,作为文化变革的关键工具,以保护外科医生的福祉和患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书