Changing frequencies: Boston Naming Test normative data for Australian young adults.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1071/IB25146
Chloe Sidwell, Annabel Hudson, Genevieve Rayner, Charles B Malpas, Fiore D'Aprano
{"title":"Changing frequencies: Boston Naming Test normative data for Australian young adults.","authors":"Chloe Sidwell, Annabel Hudson, Genevieve Rayner, Charles B Malpas, Fiore D'Aprano","doi":"10.1071/IB25146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is a commonly used measure of visual confrontation naming, where performance is quantified relative to demographically representative normative data. Given that there are currently no BNT normative data for Australian young adults, the present study aimed to create normative data and determine item familiarity among this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 73 Australian university students (mean age 20.04 years, range 18-34 years old, 73% assigned female at birth). Participants were sampled on the standard BNT-2 items 1-60 and three additional Australian items. Normative data were created for this sample, producing z, T and percentile scores for raw BNT scores. Additionally, the number of correct responses to each item was calculated as the index of item familiarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean BNT scores (mean 52.23/60, s.d. 4.44) were determined. At an item level, the current sample was uniquely unfamiliar with items 'yoke', 'trellis' and 'latch', and more familiar with items 'pretzel' and 'beaver' than normative samples from Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Normative BNT data were produced for Australian young adults, the unique performance of which highlights the importance of representative and iteratively updated BNT normative data for accurate clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB25146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is a commonly used measure of visual confrontation naming, where performance is quantified relative to demographically representative normative data. Given that there are currently no BNT normative data for Australian young adults, the present study aimed to create normative data and determine item familiarity among this population.

Methods: Participants were 73 Australian university students (mean age 20.04 years, range 18-34 years old, 73% assigned female at birth). Participants were sampled on the standard BNT-2 items 1-60 and three additional Australian items. Normative data were created for this sample, producing z, T and percentile scores for raw BNT scores. Additionally, the number of correct responses to each item was calculated as the index of item familiarity.

Results: Mean BNT scores (mean 52.23/60, s.d. 4.44) were determined. At an item level, the current sample was uniquely unfamiliar with items 'yoke', 'trellis' and 'latch', and more familiar with items 'pretzel' and 'beaver' than normative samples from Australia and New Zealand.

Conclusions: Normative BNT data were produced for Australian young adults, the unique performance of which highlights the importance of representative and iteratively updated BNT normative data for accurate clinical decision-making.

改变频率:波士顿命名测试对澳大利亚年轻人的规范性数据。
背景:波士顿命名测试(BNT)是一种常用的视觉对抗命名测量方法,其表现是相对于人口统计学代表性的规范性数据进行量化的。鉴于目前没有澳大利亚年轻人的BNT规范数据,本研究旨在创建规范数据并确定该人群的项目熟悉度。方法:参与者为73名澳大利亚大学生(平均年龄20.04岁,18-34岁,73%出生时为女性)。参与者在标准的BNT-2项目1-60和三个额外的澳大利亚项目上取样。为该样本创建了规范性数据,生成原始BNT分数的z、T和百分位数分数。此外,对每个项目的正确回答的数量被计算作为项目熟悉度的指标。结果:确定了BNT平均评分(平均52.23/60,标准差4.44)。在项目层面上,当前的样本对“轭”、“格架”和“闩锁”等项目非常不熟悉,而对“pretzel”和“beaver”等项目比来自澳大利亚和新西兰的标准样本更熟悉。结论:规范的BNT数据是为澳大利亚年轻人制作的,其独特的表现突出了代表性和迭代更新的BNT规范数据对于准确的临床决策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书