Cognition: Effects of Cognitive Workload on Driving Performance: A Comparison of Novice and Experienced Drivers in Underground Coal Mine Transport Vehicles.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xueyi Li, Yangcheng Wang, Yonghong Liu
{"title":"Cognition: Effects of Cognitive Workload on Driving Performance: A Comparison of Novice and Experienced Drivers in Underground Coal Mine Transport Vehicles.","authors":"Xueyi Li, Yangcheng Wang, Yonghong Liu","doi":"10.1177/00187208261478474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo examine how cognitive workload influences physiological responses, driving performance, and subjective workload in underground coal mine transport, with comparisons between novice and experienced drivers.BackgroundCognitive workload is a key determinant of safety and performance in high-risk driving environments. However, little is known about how driver experience shapes responses to workload demands in underground coal mine transport operations.MethodsSixty drivers (30 novices, 30 experienced) participated in four experimental conditions (baseline, warning stimulus, distraction, dual-task). Data from 54 participants were included in the final analysis after excluding unusable recordings. Physiological indicators (heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, and variability), driving performance metrics, and subjective workload (NASA-TLX) were analyzed. Linear mixed models were applied to examine relationships among workload, physiology, and performance.ResultsIncreased workload elevated physiological strain and subjective demand while impairing driving performance. Novices exhibited a linear decline in performance, whereas experienced drivers showed possible nonlinear workload-performance patterns.ConclusionDriver experience moderates the workload-performance relationship. Integrating physiological, performance, and subjective indicators provides a more comprehensive understanding of workload effects in underground driving contexts.ApplicationFindings can guide the development of adaptive driver support systems that dynamically respond to workload fluctuations, enhancing safety, reducing errors, and improving operational efficiency in high-risk mining transport environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208261478474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261478474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine how cognitive workload influences physiological responses, driving performance, and subjective workload in underground coal mine transport, with comparisons between novice and experienced drivers.BackgroundCognitive workload is a key determinant of safety and performance in high-risk driving environments. However, little is known about how driver experience shapes responses to workload demands in underground coal mine transport operations.MethodsSixty drivers (30 novices, 30 experienced) participated in four experimental conditions (baseline, warning stimulus, distraction, dual-task). Data from 54 participants were included in the final analysis after excluding unusable recordings. Physiological indicators (heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, and variability), driving performance metrics, and subjective workload (NASA-TLX) were analyzed. Linear mixed models were applied to examine relationships among workload, physiology, and performance.ResultsIncreased workload elevated physiological strain and subjective demand while impairing driving performance. Novices exhibited a linear decline in performance, whereas experienced drivers showed possible nonlinear workload-performance patterns.ConclusionDriver experience moderates the workload-performance relationship. Integrating physiological, performance, and subjective indicators provides a more comprehensive understanding of workload effects in underground driving contexts.ApplicationFindings can guide the development of adaptive driver support systems that dynamically respond to workload fluctuations, enhancing safety, reducing errors, and improving operational efficiency in high-risk mining transport environments.

认知负荷对驾驶性能的影响:煤矿井下运输车辆新手和老司机的比较
目的探讨认知负荷对煤矿井下运输驾驶员生理反应、驾驶表现和主观负荷的影响,并对新手和经验丰富的驾驶员进行比较。在高风险驾驶环境中,认知负荷是安全性能的关键决定因素。然而,对于驾驶员经验如何影响煤矿井下运输作业中工作量需求的反应,人们知之甚少。方法60名驾驶员(30名新手,30名经验丰富的驾驶员)参加了基线、警告刺激、分心、双任务四种实验条件。在排除不可用的录音后,54名参与者的数据被纳入最终分析。生理指标(心率、心率变异性、呼吸频率和变异性)、驾驶性能指标和主观工作量(NASA-TLX)进行了分析。线性混合模型应用于检查工作量,生理和性能之间的关系。结果工作负荷增加会增加驾驶员的生理压力和主观需求,降低驾驶性能。新手表现出线性的性能下降,而有经验的司机表现出可能的非线性工作负载-性能模式。结论司机经验调节了工作负荷-绩效关系。综合生理、性能和主观指标,可以更全面地了解地下驾驶环境下的工作量效应。应用研究结果可以指导自适应驾驶员支持系统的开发,该系统可以动态响应工作量波动,增强安全性,减少错误,并提高高风险采矿运输环境中的操作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书