Therapist-guided and self-guided internet-based behavioural activation versus treatment as usual for adolescents with depression: randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation.
Rebecca Andersson, Johan Ahlen, Fabian Lenhard, Anna Ohlis, Vera Wachtmeister, Moa Karemyr, Jens Högstrom, Matteo Bottai, David Mataix-Cols, Sarah Vigerland, Eva Serlachius
{"title":"Therapist-guided and self-guided internet-based behavioural activation versus treatment as usual for adolescents with depression: randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation.","authors":"Rebecca Andersson, Johan Ahlen, Fabian Lenhard, Anna Ohlis, Vera Wachtmeister, Moa Karemyr, Jens Högstrom, Matteo Bottai, David Mataix-Cols, Sarah Vigerland, Eva Serlachius","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2026-302619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent depression is a major public health concern with limited access to effective treatments. Behavioural activation (BA) is a suitable intervention for digital delivery, but definitive adolescent trials are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether therapist-guided and self-guided internet-based BA (I-BA) are more efficacious and cost-effective than treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents with mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. A total of 219 adolescents (13-17 years) with mild-moderate MDD were randomised (1:1:1) to 10 weeks of therapist-guided I-BA, self-guided I-BA or TAU. Both I-BA interventions included adolescent and parent modules.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>change in depression severity (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised, CDRS-R, range 17-113) from baseline to 3-month follow-up (primary endpoint), assessed by blinded evaluators. Analyses included all randomised participants, with statisticians blinded to allocation. A health economic evaluation was performed at the primary endpoint.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Baseline CDRS-R indicated clinically significant depression (mean 57.1, threshold ≥40). Retention at the primary endpoint was 82.6%. Mean reductions were 17.0 (therapist-guided I-BA), 16.0 (self-guided I-BA) and 11.6 (TAU), bringing both I-BA groups below the clinical cut-off. Therapist-guided I-BA showed greater reductions than TAU (estimated mean difference -4.68; 95% CI -0.05 to -9.30; p=0.048, <i>d</i>=-0.47; 95% CI 0.00 to -0.93), while self-guided I-BA was not statistically superior (estimated mean difference -3.44; 95% CI -8.05 to 1.17, p=0.14, <i>d</i>=-0.37; 95% CI -0.86 to 0.12). The predefined six-point clinical important difference was not met. Results were sensitive to modelling: significance disappeared with random slopes but effect estimates were similar; baseline-adjusted analyses favoured both I-BA arms. Both I-BA options had lower costs than TAU (p=0.03, p<0.001), with self-guided I-BA being the most economical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapist-guided I-BA reduced depressive symptoms at lower cost than TAU, but clinical importance and robustness are uncertain. Self-guided I-BA showed no clear superiority but was cost-efficient.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Therapist-guided I-BA may increase access to evidence-based care for adolescents with MDD, though findings require cautious interpretation. Self-guided I-BA may be useful where therapist access is limited, but more research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13504836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2026-302619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adolescent depression is a major public health concern with limited access to effective treatments. Behavioural activation (BA) is a suitable intervention for digital delivery, but definitive adolescent trials are scarce.
Objective: To evaluate whether therapist-guided and self-guided internet-based BA (I-BA) are more efficacious and cost-effective than treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents with mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD).
Methods: Single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. A total of 219 adolescents (13-17 years) with mild-moderate MDD were randomised (1:1:1) to 10 weeks of therapist-guided I-BA, self-guided I-BA or TAU. Both I-BA interventions included adolescent and parent modules.
Primary outcome: change in depression severity (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised, CDRS-R, range 17-113) from baseline to 3-month follow-up (primary endpoint), assessed by blinded evaluators. Analyses included all randomised participants, with statisticians blinded to allocation. A health economic evaluation was performed at the primary endpoint.
Findings: Baseline CDRS-R indicated clinically significant depression (mean 57.1, threshold ≥40). Retention at the primary endpoint was 82.6%. Mean reductions were 17.0 (therapist-guided I-BA), 16.0 (self-guided I-BA) and 11.6 (TAU), bringing both I-BA groups below the clinical cut-off. Therapist-guided I-BA showed greater reductions than TAU (estimated mean difference -4.68; 95% CI -0.05 to -9.30; p=0.048, d=-0.47; 95% CI 0.00 to -0.93), while self-guided I-BA was not statistically superior (estimated mean difference -3.44; 95% CI -8.05 to 1.17, p=0.14, d=-0.37; 95% CI -0.86 to 0.12). The predefined six-point clinical important difference was not met. Results were sensitive to modelling: significance disappeared with random slopes but effect estimates were similar; baseline-adjusted analyses favoured both I-BA arms. Both I-BA options had lower costs than TAU (p=0.03, p<0.001), with self-guided I-BA being the most economical.
Conclusions: Therapist-guided I-BA reduced depressive symptoms at lower cost than TAU, but clinical importance and robustness are uncertain. Self-guided I-BA showed no clear superiority but was cost-efficient.
Clinical implications: Therapist-guided I-BA may increase access to evidence-based care for adolescents with MDD, though findings require cautious interpretation. Self-guided I-BA may be useful where therapist access is limited, but more research is needed.