Learning and Engaging With AI: An Exploration of the Effects of Mental Workload and Search Behavior on Short-Term Computer-Based Learning With a Chatbot.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alexandre Marois, Isabelle Lavallée, Gabrielle Boily, Jonay Ramon Alaman
{"title":"Learning and Engaging With AI: An Exploration of the Effects of Mental Workload and Search Behavior on Short-Term Computer-Based Learning With a Chatbot.","authors":"Alexandre Marois, Isabelle Lavallée, Gabrielle Boily, Jonay Ramon Alaman","doi":"10.1177/00187208261474518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study examined how learning, workload and search behaviors were impacted by a chatbot during a self-regulated Web search task, as opposed to more classic search engines.BackgroundArtificial intelligence technologies, including chatbots, are becoming increasingly accessible. These tools have been demonstrated useful to support self-regulated learning, mostly in structured learning contexts. The reduction in workload they offer may, however, prevent key learning strategies from being deployed, especially for Web search.MethodSixty participants were asked to answer a set of essay questions and to rate their workload, effort deployed and literacy while either gathering information from the Internet (Web condition) or by chatting with a chatbot (LLM condition) with the possibility of verifying information on the Web. Several key search strategies and chatbot interaction measures were extracted. A surprise memory test was also presented to evaluate how they learned the content addressed in the essay questions.ResultsMeasures of effort, mental workload, search behaviors and literacy differed significantly across conditions. Performance on the memory test did not vary. Multiple relationships with memory performance, including key Web search and verification behaviors, were found.ConclusionChatbots may help reduce workload and short-term learning with a chatbot may be more influenced by the nature of the interaction with the tool, rather than the tool itself.ApplicationEffective uses of chatbots may require learners to verify the content generated by the chatbot and to show superior engagement. Engagement-promoting learning activities should be considered when using LLM-driven agents to support self-regulated, Web-based search.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208261474518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261474518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examined how learning, workload and search behaviors were impacted by a chatbot during a self-regulated Web search task, as opposed to more classic search engines.BackgroundArtificial intelligence technologies, including chatbots, are becoming increasingly accessible. These tools have been demonstrated useful to support self-regulated learning, mostly in structured learning contexts. The reduction in workload they offer may, however, prevent key learning strategies from being deployed, especially for Web search.MethodSixty participants were asked to answer a set of essay questions and to rate their workload, effort deployed and literacy while either gathering information from the Internet (Web condition) or by chatting with a chatbot (LLM condition) with the possibility of verifying information on the Web. Several key search strategies and chatbot interaction measures were extracted. A surprise memory test was also presented to evaluate how they learned the content addressed in the essay questions.ResultsMeasures of effort, mental workload, search behaviors and literacy differed significantly across conditions. Performance on the memory test did not vary. Multiple relationships with memory performance, including key Web search and verification behaviors, were found.ConclusionChatbots may help reduce workload and short-term learning with a chatbot may be more influenced by the nature of the interaction with the tool, rather than the tool itself.ApplicationEffective uses of chatbots may require learners to verify the content generated by the chatbot and to show superior engagement. Engagement-promoting learning activities should be considered when using LLM-driven agents to support self-regulated, Web-based search.

学习和参与人工智能:探索心理负荷和搜索行为对聊天机器人短期计算机学习的影响。
目的:本研究考察了在自我调节的网络搜索任务中,聊天机器人对学习、工作量和搜索行为的影响,而不是更经典的搜索引擎。包括聊天机器人在内的人工智能技术正变得越来越普及。这些工具已被证明对支持自我调节学习很有用,主要是在结构化的学习环境中。然而,它们提供的工作量减少可能会阻止部署关键的学习策略,特别是对于Web搜索。60名参与者被要求回答一组问答问题,并评估他们的工作量、投入的努力和读写能力,同时从互联网(网络条件)收集信息,或者通过聊天机器人(LLM条件)聊天,并可能在网络上验证信息。提取了几种关键搜索策略和聊天机器人交互度量。一个意外的记忆测试也被提出来评估他们是如何学习论文问题中的内容的。结果不同条件下的努力、脑力负荷、搜索行为和读写能力差异显著。记忆测试的表现没有变化。发现了与内存性能的多重关系,包括关键的Web搜索和验证行为。聊天机器人可以帮助减少工作量,使用聊天机器人的短期学习可能更多地受到与工具交互的性质的影响,而不是工具本身。应用程序聊天机器人的有效使用可能需要学习者验证聊天机器人生成的内容,并表现出卓越的参与度。当使用法学硕士驱动的代理来支持自我调节的基于web的搜索时,应该考虑促进参与的学习活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书