{"title":"Retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction: 5 years on, what is the evidence, who are the failures?","authors":"Trina Kailin Chia, Zhou Hao Leong","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Awareness of retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD) has accelerated substantially in the last 5 years, amongst both physicians and patients, especially with growing patient communities on social media. As the volume of research has grown rapidly, this review provides a timely synthesis of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and in particular, treatment failure, an area that remains underexplored despite its importance to clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>RCPD lacks a validated diagnostic test; high-resolution impedance manometry offers pathophysiological insight but has yet to yield normative diagnostic thresholds. Injection of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) into the cricopharyngeus muscle remains first-line treatment, delivered either transorally in the operating theatre or percutaneously in-office, with comparable efficacy but differing doses and side-effect profiles. Reported success rates are high but heterogeneous, reflecting variable outcome definitions. Evidence on managing treatment failures - including repeat injection, dose escalation, and surgical salvage - remains sparse and largely anecdotal.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Standardized diagnostic criteria and outcome measures are needed to enable meaningful cross-study comparison and evidence-based management of RCPD, particularly for patients who fail first-line BoNT-A therapy. Realistic pretreatment counselling and wider publication of treatment failures are recommended to strengthen the evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Awareness of retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD) has accelerated substantially in the last 5 years, amongst both physicians and patients, especially with growing patient communities on social media. As the volume of research has grown rapidly, this review provides a timely synthesis of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and in particular, treatment failure, an area that remains underexplored despite its importance to clinical decision-making.
Recent findings: RCPD lacks a validated diagnostic test; high-resolution impedance manometry offers pathophysiological insight but has yet to yield normative diagnostic thresholds. Injection of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) into the cricopharyngeus muscle remains first-line treatment, delivered either transorally in the operating theatre or percutaneously in-office, with comparable efficacy but differing doses and side-effect profiles. Reported success rates are high but heterogeneous, reflecting variable outcome definitions. Evidence on managing treatment failures - including repeat injection, dose escalation, and surgical salvage - remains sparse and largely anecdotal.
Summary: Standardized diagnostic criteria and outcome measures are needed to enable meaningful cross-study comparison and evidence-based management of RCPD, particularly for patients who fail first-line BoNT-A therapy. Realistic pretreatment counselling and wider publication of treatment failures are recommended to strengthen the evidence.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including maxillofacial surgery, head and neck oncology and speech therapy and rehabilitation – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.