Retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction: 5 years on, what is the evidence, who are the failures?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Trina Kailin Chia, Zhou Hao Leong
{"title":"Retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction: 5 years on, what is the evidence, who are the failures?","authors":"Trina Kailin Chia, Zhou Hao Leong","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Awareness of retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD) has accelerated substantially in the last 5 years, amongst both physicians and patients, especially with growing patient communities on social media. As the volume of research has grown rapidly, this review provides a timely synthesis of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and in particular, treatment failure, an area that remains underexplored despite its importance to clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>RCPD lacks a validated diagnostic test; high-resolution impedance manometry offers pathophysiological insight but has yet to yield normative diagnostic thresholds. Injection of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) into the cricopharyngeus muscle remains first-line treatment, delivered either transorally in the operating theatre or percutaneously in-office, with comparable efficacy but differing doses and side-effect profiles. Reported success rates are high but heterogeneous, reflecting variable outcome definitions. Evidence on managing treatment failures - including repeat injection, dose escalation, and surgical salvage - remains sparse and largely anecdotal.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Standardized diagnostic criteria and outcome measures are needed to enable meaningful cross-study comparison and evidence-based management of RCPD, particularly for patients who fail first-line BoNT-A therapy. Realistic pretreatment counselling and wider publication of treatment failures are recommended to strengthen the evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Awareness of retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD) has accelerated substantially in the last 5 years, amongst both physicians and patients, especially with growing patient communities on social media. As the volume of research has grown rapidly, this review provides a timely synthesis of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and in particular, treatment failure, an area that remains underexplored despite its importance to clinical decision-making.

Recent findings: RCPD lacks a validated diagnostic test; high-resolution impedance manometry offers pathophysiological insight but has yet to yield normative diagnostic thresholds. Injection of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) into the cricopharyngeus muscle remains first-line treatment, delivered either transorally in the operating theatre or percutaneously in-office, with comparable efficacy but differing doses and side-effect profiles. Reported success rates are high but heterogeneous, reflecting variable outcome definitions. Evidence on managing treatment failures - including repeat injection, dose escalation, and surgical salvage - remains sparse and largely anecdotal.

Summary: Standardized diagnostic criteria and outcome measures are needed to enable meaningful cross-study comparison and evidence-based management of RCPD, particularly for patients who fail first-line BoNT-A therapy. Realistic pretreatment counselling and wider publication of treatment failures are recommended to strengthen the evidence.

逆行环咽功能障碍:5年来,有什么证据,谁是失败的?
回顾目的:在过去的5年中,医生和患者对逆行性环咽功能障碍(RCPD)的认识大大提高,尤其是在社交媒体上不断增长的患者群体中。随着研究数量的迅速增长,本综述及时地综合了目前关于诊断、治疗,特别是治疗失败的证据,这一领域尽管对临床决策很重要,但仍未得到充分的探索。近期发现:RCPD缺乏有效的诊断测试;高分辨率阻抗测压法提供了病理生理学的见解,但尚未产生规范的诊断阈值。环咽部肌内注射肉毒毒素a (BoNT-A)仍是一线治疗方法,可在手术室经口或经皮,疗效相当,但剂量和副作用不同。报告的成功率很高,但各不相同,反映了不同的结果定义。关于处理治疗失败的证据——包括重复注射、剂量增加和手术挽救——仍然很少,而且主要是轶事。总结:需要标准化的诊断标准和结果测量,以实现有意义的交叉研究比较和RCPD的循证管理,特别是对于一线BoNT-A治疗失败的患者。建议现实的预处理咨询和更广泛的治疗失败的出版物,以加强证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including maxillofacial surgery, head and neck oncology and speech therapy and rehabilitation – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书