Trial-to-Trial Repeatability and Curve-Level Reliability of Rotational-Progress-Aligned Kinematic Waveforms During the Primary 360° Rotation of a Rumba Turning Sequence.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mimi Guo, Muhamad Hafiz Bin Ismail, Diyana Zulaika Binti Abdul Ghani, Qi Liang, Yifei Gao
{"title":"Trial-to-Trial Repeatability and Curve-Level Reliability of Rotational-Progress-Aligned Kinematic Waveforms During the Primary 360° Rotation of a Rumba Turning Sequence.","authors":"Mimi Guo, Muhamad Hafiz Bin Ismail, Diyana Zulaika Binti Abdul Ghani, Qi Liang, Yifei Gao","doi":"10.1123/jab.2026-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rumba turning sequence is technically demanding, but the repeatability of continuous kinematic waveforms during repeated performance remains unclear. This study examined trial-to-trial repeatability and curve-level reliability of rotational-progress-aligned kinematic waveforms during the primary 360° rotation in a standardized rumba turning sequence, corresponding to the initial spiral turn. Fifteen high-level adolescent female Latin dancers completed 5 valid trials at 76 beats per minute. Kinematic data were collected using a 10-camera Vicon 3-dimensional motion capture system (100 Hz). Support-foot progression angle, pelvic obliquity, and thorax-pelvis relative frontal-plane angle were analyzed across 101 rotational-progress points. Whole-waveform similarity, point-by-point SD, integrated intraclass correlation coefficient(A,1), integrated standard error of measurement, and key-event reliability were calculated. All variables showed high whole-waveform similarity (r = .932-.944). Integrated intraclass correlation coefficient(A,1) ranged from .545 to .675. Integrated standard error of measurement was smallest for pelvic obliquity (3.98°) and largest for support-foot progression angle (10.55°). Variability hotspots occurred in specific rotational-progress regions, and magnitude-related key events generally showed smaller absolute error than timing-related events. These findings indicate that continuous kinematic variables differ in reliability and measurement error and should be selected cautiously for repeated technical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2026-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rumba turning sequence is technically demanding, but the repeatability of continuous kinematic waveforms during repeated performance remains unclear. This study examined trial-to-trial repeatability and curve-level reliability of rotational-progress-aligned kinematic waveforms during the primary 360° rotation in a standardized rumba turning sequence, corresponding to the initial spiral turn. Fifteen high-level adolescent female Latin dancers completed 5 valid trials at 76 beats per minute. Kinematic data were collected using a 10-camera Vicon 3-dimensional motion capture system (100 Hz). Support-foot progression angle, pelvic obliquity, and thorax-pelvis relative frontal-plane angle were analyzed across 101 rotational-progress points. Whole-waveform similarity, point-by-point SD, integrated intraclass correlation coefficient(A,1), integrated standard error of measurement, and key-event reliability were calculated. All variables showed high whole-waveform similarity (r = .932-.944). Integrated intraclass correlation coefficient(A,1) ranged from .545 to .675. Integrated standard error of measurement was smallest for pelvic obliquity (3.98°) and largest for support-foot progression angle (10.55°). Variability hotspots occurred in specific rotational-progress regions, and magnitude-related key events generally showed smaller absolute error than timing-related events. These findings indicate that continuous kinematic variables differ in reliability and measurement error and should be selected cautiously for repeated technical assessment.

在伦巴旋转序列的主要360°旋转期间,旋转进程对齐的运动学波形的试验到试验的可重复性和曲线级可靠性。
伦巴旋转序列在技术上要求很高,但在重复表演期间连续运动波形的可重复性仍然不清楚。本研究检验了在标准伦巴旋转序列中初始360°旋转过程中旋转进程对齐的运动学波形的试验对试验的重复性和曲线级可靠性,对应于初始螺旋旋转。15名高水平青少年女性拉丁舞者以每分钟76次的节拍完成了5次有效试验。采用10个摄像头Vicon三维运动捕捉系统(100 Hz)收集运动学数据。通过101个旋转进步点分析支撑-足推进角、骨盆倾角和胸-骨盆相对前平面角。计算全波形相似度、逐点SD、类内综合相关系数(A,1)、测量综合标准误差和关键事件信度。所有变量的全波形相似度均较高(r = 0.932 ~ 0.944)。综合类内相关系数(A,1)取值范围为。545到0.675。盆腔倾角最小(3.98°),支足推进角最大(10.55°)。变率热点发生在特定的旋转进程区域,与震级相关的关键事件的绝对误差通常小于与时间相关的事件。这些结果表明,连续运动变量在可靠性和测量误差方面存在差异,在进行重复技术评估时应谨慎选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书