Utility of pleural fluid biomarkers in differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusion: a cross-sectional study.

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Nishant Kumar Chauhan, Yogendra Singh Rathore, Mithu Banerjee, Naveen Dutt, Gopal Durgeshwar, Iyer Hariharan
{"title":"Utility of pleural fluid biomarkers in differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusion: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Nishant Kumar Chauhan, Yogendra Singh Rathore, Mithu Banerjee, Naveen Dutt, Gopal Durgeshwar, Iyer Hariharan","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2026.3731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As cytopathological examination of the pleural fluid (PF) has a low yield, it is difficult to differentiate benign from malignant pleural effusions (PEs). There is still a lack of biomarkers in PF that can reliably help in diagnosing malignant PEs. Diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing malignant PEs is enhanced by the presence of tumor markers in PE. This would raise the likelihood of diagnosing malignant PEs with an unclear cause and starting treatment interventions early to lower morbidity and death rates in the patient. Thus, in an effort to enhance the PE diagnosis, novel PF biomarkers such as cancer ratio, cancer ratio plus, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), and calprotectin were evaluated. A total of 108 patients with PEs were taken, and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 83 patients with exudative PE were evaluated. After clinical history and routine blood investigations, PF was sent for cytopathology, biochemical examinations, microbiological examinations for aerobic culture, fungal culture, mycobacterial culture, and biomarker (CEA, CA-125, calprotectin) analyses. Out of 83 patients with exudative PE, malignant effusion was diagnosed in 40 patients, while 43 had benign effusions. PF biomarkers adenosine deaminase (ADA), CEA, cancer ratio, calprotectin, age/ADA and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/calprotectin ratio showed a statistically significant (p<0.0001) difference between benign and malignant PE. PF CEA showed the highest specificity (97.67%) at the cut-off point of 1.96 ng/mL and age/ADA ratio showed the highest sensitivity (97.5%) at the cut-off point of 1.56 for prediction of malignancy. Cancer ratio, PL calprotectin and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio also showed good sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of malignancy. PF CA-125 showed poor sensitivity (50%) and cancer ratio plus did not reveal any statistically significant difference for prediction of malignancy from benign effusion (p=0.486). PF biomarkers (cancer ratio, CEA, age/ADA ratio, calprotectin, and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio) are reliable indicators of malignancy in exudative pleural effusions. Patients with exudative lymphocytic with unexplained pleural effusion can be addressed early using inexpensive and generally available biochemical indicators, such as pleural fluid CEA, calprotectin, cancer ratio, and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2026.3731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As cytopathological examination of the pleural fluid (PF) has a low yield, it is difficult to differentiate benign from malignant pleural effusions (PEs). There is still a lack of biomarkers in PF that can reliably help in diagnosing malignant PEs. Diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing malignant PEs is enhanced by the presence of tumor markers in PE. This would raise the likelihood of diagnosing malignant PEs with an unclear cause and starting treatment interventions early to lower morbidity and death rates in the patient. Thus, in an effort to enhance the PE diagnosis, novel PF biomarkers such as cancer ratio, cancer ratio plus, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), and calprotectin were evaluated. A total of 108 patients with PEs were taken, and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 83 patients with exudative PE were evaluated. After clinical history and routine blood investigations, PF was sent for cytopathology, biochemical examinations, microbiological examinations for aerobic culture, fungal culture, mycobacterial culture, and biomarker (CEA, CA-125, calprotectin) analyses. Out of 83 patients with exudative PE, malignant effusion was diagnosed in 40 patients, while 43 had benign effusions. PF biomarkers adenosine deaminase (ADA), CEA, cancer ratio, calprotectin, age/ADA and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/calprotectin ratio showed a statistically significant (p<0.0001) difference between benign and malignant PE. PF CEA showed the highest specificity (97.67%) at the cut-off point of 1.96 ng/mL and age/ADA ratio showed the highest sensitivity (97.5%) at the cut-off point of 1.56 for prediction of malignancy. Cancer ratio, PL calprotectin and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio also showed good sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of malignancy. PF CA-125 showed poor sensitivity (50%) and cancer ratio plus did not reveal any statistically significant difference for prediction of malignancy from benign effusion (p=0.486). PF biomarkers (cancer ratio, CEA, age/ADA ratio, calprotectin, and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio) are reliable indicators of malignancy in exudative pleural effusions. Patients with exudative lymphocytic with unexplained pleural effusion can be addressed early using inexpensive and generally available biochemical indicators, such as pleural fluid CEA, calprotectin, cancer ratio, and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio.

胸水生物标志物在鉴别恶性和良性胸腔积液中的应用:一项横断面研究。
由于胸膜积液(PF)的细胞病理学检查率低,很难区分良性和恶性胸膜积液(PEs)。在PF中仍然缺乏能够可靠地帮助诊断恶性pe的生物标志物。肿瘤标志物的存在提高了恶性PE的诊断准确性。这将提高诊断病因不明的恶性pe的可能性,并尽早开始治疗干预,以降低患者的发病率和死亡率。因此,为了提高PE的诊断,我们评估了新的PF生物标志物,如癌比、癌比加、癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原125 (CA-125)和钙保护蛋白。共收集PE患者108例,应用纳入和排除标准,对83例渗出性PE患者进行评估。经临床病史和血常规检查后,患者接受细胞病理学检查、生化检查、微生物检查(需氧培养、真菌培养、分枝杆菌培养)和生物标志物(CEA、CA-125、钙保护蛋白)分析。在83例渗出性PE患者中,40例诊断为恶性积液,43例诊断为良性积液。PF生物标志物腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、CEA、癌比、钙保护蛋白、年龄/ADA和血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)/钙保护蛋白比差异均有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书