Is the Bilayer Insertion of the Peptide KALP23 Under Kinetic or Thermodynamic Control?

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Alexander Kyrychenko, Alexey S Ladokhin
{"title":"Is the Bilayer Insertion of the Peptide KALP23 Under Kinetic or Thermodynamic Control?","authors":"Alexander Kyrychenko, Alexey S Ladokhin","doi":"10.1007/s00232-026-00397-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Replacing a protein's sidechain can alter its interaction with a membrane, conferring a thermodynamic benefit or penalty. These thermodynamic consequences of mutations can be estimated using hydrophobicity scales, yet are challenging to validate experimentally. Here, we examine the structural and thermodynamic consequences of membrane interactions using two model peptides KALP23 and WALP23. In these peptides, respectively, two lysine residues or two tryptophan residues are placed at each end of a transmembrane helix. Application of several hydrophobicity scales suggests that the free energy of insertion of KALP23 is 10-15 kcal/mol less favorable than that of WALP23. According to these predictions, the lowest free energy for KALP would be in solution and not in the membrane, and KALP would be kinetically \"trapped\" in the transmembrane conformation during standard sample preparation based on co-solubilization with lipids in organic solvents. In order to quantitatively test this prediction, we utilized a different approach of sample preparation which utilizes fluorinated surfactants capable of maintain hydrophobic peptides in solution without interacting with the bilayer themselves. We demonstrated that both peptides can be inserted into the preformed vesicles, and that the free energy difference between their partitioning is < 1 kcal/mol. These results disprove the hypothesis that KALP peptides are kinetically trapped and open the doors for using this system for thermodynamic measurements to further test the additivity assumptions implicit in applications of hydrophobicity scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":50129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Biology","volume":"259 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-026-00397-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Replacing a protein's sidechain can alter its interaction with a membrane, conferring a thermodynamic benefit or penalty. These thermodynamic consequences of mutations can be estimated using hydrophobicity scales, yet are challenging to validate experimentally. Here, we examine the structural and thermodynamic consequences of membrane interactions using two model peptides KALP23 and WALP23. In these peptides, respectively, two lysine residues or two tryptophan residues are placed at each end of a transmembrane helix. Application of several hydrophobicity scales suggests that the free energy of insertion of KALP23 is 10-15 kcal/mol less favorable than that of WALP23. According to these predictions, the lowest free energy for KALP would be in solution and not in the membrane, and KALP would be kinetically "trapped" in the transmembrane conformation during standard sample preparation based on co-solubilization with lipids in organic solvents. In order to quantitatively test this prediction, we utilized a different approach of sample preparation which utilizes fluorinated surfactants capable of maintain hydrophobic peptides in solution without interacting with the bilayer themselves. We demonstrated that both peptides can be inserted into the preformed vesicles, and that the free energy difference between their partitioning is < 1 kcal/mol. These results disprove the hypothesis that KALP peptides are kinetically trapped and open the doors for using this system for thermodynamic measurements to further test the additivity assumptions implicit in applications of hydrophobicity scales.

肽KALP23的双分子层插入是受动力学还是热力学控制?
替换蛋白质的侧链可以改变其与膜的相互作用,从而在热力学上有利有弊。这些突变的热力学后果可以用疏水性尺度来估计,但在实验上验证是具有挑战性的。在这里,我们使用两种模型肽KALP23和WALP23来研究膜相互作用的结构和热力学后果。在这些多肽中,两个赖氨酸残基或两个色氨酸残基分别位于跨膜螺旋的两端。几个疏水尺度的应用表明,KALP23的插入自由能比WALP23低10 ~ 15 kcal/mol。根据这些预测,KALP的最低自由能将在溶液中而不是在膜中,并且在有机溶剂中与脂质共溶的标准样品制备过程中,KALP将被动力学地“捕获”在跨膜构象中。为了定量测试这一预测,我们采用了一种不同的样品制备方法,该方法利用了能够在溶液中维持疏水肽而不与双层本身相互作用的氟化表面活性剂。我们证明了这两种肽都可以插入到预先形成的囊泡中,并且它们的分配之间的自由能差为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Membrane Biology
Journal of Membrane Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Membrane Biology is dedicated to publishing high-quality science related to membrane biology, biochemistry and biophysics. In particular, we welcome work that uses modern experimental or computational methods including but not limited to those with microscopy, diffraction, NMR, computer simulations, or biochemistry aimed at membrane associated or membrane embedded proteins or model membrane systems. These methods might be applied to study topics like membrane protein structure and function, membrane mediated or controlled signaling mechanisms, cell-cell communication via gap junctions, the behavior of proteins and lipids based on monolayer or bilayer systems, or genetic and regulatory mechanisms controlling membrane function. Research articles, short communications and reviews are all welcome. We also encourage authors to consider publishing ''negative'' results where experiments or simulations were well performed, but resulted in unusual or unexpected outcomes without obvious explanations. While we welcome connections to clinical studies, submissions that are primarily clinical in nature or that fail to make connections to the basic science issues of membrane structure, chemistry and function, are not appropriate for the journal. In a similar way, studies that are primarily descriptive and narratives of assays in a clinical or population study are best published in other journals. If you are not certain, it is entirely appropriate to write to us to inquire if your study is a good fit for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书