{"title":"Is the Bilayer Insertion of the Peptide KALP23 Under Kinetic or Thermodynamic Control?","authors":"Alexander Kyrychenko, Alexey S Ladokhin","doi":"10.1007/s00232-026-00397-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Replacing a protein's sidechain can alter its interaction with a membrane, conferring a thermodynamic benefit or penalty. These thermodynamic consequences of mutations can be estimated using hydrophobicity scales, yet are challenging to validate experimentally. Here, we examine the structural and thermodynamic consequences of membrane interactions using two model peptides KALP23 and WALP23. In these peptides, respectively, two lysine residues or two tryptophan residues are placed at each end of a transmembrane helix. Application of several hydrophobicity scales suggests that the free energy of insertion of KALP23 is 10-15 kcal/mol less favorable than that of WALP23. According to these predictions, the lowest free energy for KALP would be in solution and not in the membrane, and KALP would be kinetically \"trapped\" in the transmembrane conformation during standard sample preparation based on co-solubilization with lipids in organic solvents. In order to quantitatively test this prediction, we utilized a different approach of sample preparation which utilizes fluorinated surfactants capable of maintain hydrophobic peptides in solution without interacting with the bilayer themselves. We demonstrated that both peptides can be inserted into the preformed vesicles, and that the free energy difference between their partitioning is < 1 kcal/mol. These results disprove the hypothesis that KALP peptides are kinetically trapped and open the doors for using this system for thermodynamic measurements to further test the additivity assumptions implicit in applications of hydrophobicity scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":50129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Biology","volume":"259 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-026-00397-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Replacing a protein's sidechain can alter its interaction with a membrane, conferring a thermodynamic benefit or penalty. These thermodynamic consequences of mutations can be estimated using hydrophobicity scales, yet are challenging to validate experimentally. Here, we examine the structural and thermodynamic consequences of membrane interactions using two model peptides KALP23 and WALP23. In these peptides, respectively, two lysine residues or two tryptophan residues are placed at each end of a transmembrane helix. Application of several hydrophobicity scales suggests that the free energy of insertion of KALP23 is 10-15 kcal/mol less favorable than that of WALP23. According to these predictions, the lowest free energy for KALP would be in solution and not in the membrane, and KALP would be kinetically "trapped" in the transmembrane conformation during standard sample preparation based on co-solubilization with lipids in organic solvents. In order to quantitatively test this prediction, we utilized a different approach of sample preparation which utilizes fluorinated surfactants capable of maintain hydrophobic peptides in solution without interacting with the bilayer themselves. We demonstrated that both peptides can be inserted into the preformed vesicles, and that the free energy difference between their partitioning is < 1 kcal/mol. These results disprove the hypothesis that KALP peptides are kinetically trapped and open the doors for using this system for thermodynamic measurements to further test the additivity assumptions implicit in applications of hydrophobicity scales.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Membrane Biology is dedicated to publishing high-quality science related to membrane biology, biochemistry and biophysics. In particular, we welcome work that uses modern experimental or computational methods including but not limited to those with microscopy, diffraction, NMR, computer simulations, or biochemistry aimed at membrane associated or membrane embedded proteins or model membrane systems. These methods might be applied to study topics like membrane protein structure and function, membrane mediated or controlled signaling mechanisms, cell-cell communication via gap junctions, the behavior of proteins and lipids based on monolayer or bilayer systems, or genetic and regulatory mechanisms controlling membrane function.
Research articles, short communications and reviews are all welcome. We also encourage authors to consider publishing ''negative'' results where experiments or simulations were well performed, but resulted in unusual or unexpected outcomes without obvious explanations.
While we welcome connections to clinical studies, submissions that are primarily clinical in nature or that fail to make connections to the basic science issues of membrane structure, chemistry and function, are not appropriate for the journal. In a similar way, studies that are primarily descriptive and narratives of assays in a clinical or population study are best published in other journals. If you are not certain, it is entirely appropriate to write to us to inquire if your study is a good fit for the journal.