Integrated rehabilitation and ambulatory recovery in older adults with hip fracture according to muscle strength and sarcopenia status: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Seung-Kyu Lim, Jae-Young Lim
{"title":"Integrated rehabilitation and ambulatory recovery in older adults with hip fracture according to muscle strength and sarcopenia status: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Seung-Kyu Lim, Jae-Young Lim","doi":"10.1007/s41999-026-01587-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia and impaired muscle strength are common in older adults with hip fractures and are strongly associated with poor functional recovery. Although integrated multidisciplinary rehabilitation improves outcomes after hip fracture, whether its benefits differ according to baseline muscle strength or sarcopenia severity remains unclear. This study aimed to examine whether the functional benefits of Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management (FIRM) vary according to sarcopenia status and handgrip strength (HGS) in older adults after hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing FIRM with conventional rehabilitation in adults aged ≥ 65 years undergoing hip fracture surgery. The primary outcome was independent ambulation at 12 months. Sarcopenia was classified using three approaches: sarcopenia versus non-sarcopenia, a three-level classification (non-sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and sarcopenia), and low versus normal HGS. Logistic regression models, including treatment, sarcopenia status, and their interactions, were fitted with sequential adjustments for relevant covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 203 randomized participants, 119 (58.6%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Treatment-by-sarcopenia interactions were not statistically significant. Stratum-specific analyses suggested a pattern of greater functional improvement with FIRM than with conventional rehabilitation, particularly among participants with low HGS and, to a lesser extent, those with sarcopenia. In the fully adjusted models, FIRM was associated with greater improvement in independent ambulation among participants with low HGS (odds ratio, 4.25; risk difference, + 34.7%; P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrated rehabilitation may provide greater functional benefits than conventional rehabilitation in older adults with hip fractures, particularly among those with low muscle strength. However, given the lack of statistically significant interaction effects and the attenuation of the observed associations in the fully adjusted models, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-026-01587-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Sarcopenia and impaired muscle strength are common in older adults with hip fractures and are strongly associated with poor functional recovery. Although integrated multidisciplinary rehabilitation improves outcomes after hip fracture, whether its benefits differ according to baseline muscle strength or sarcopenia severity remains unclear. This study aimed to examine whether the functional benefits of Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management (FIRM) vary according to sarcopenia status and handgrip strength (HGS) in older adults after hip fracture surgery.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing FIRM with conventional rehabilitation in adults aged ≥ 65 years undergoing hip fracture surgery. The primary outcome was independent ambulation at 12 months. Sarcopenia was classified using three approaches: sarcopenia versus non-sarcopenia, a three-level classification (non-sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and sarcopenia), and low versus normal HGS. Logistic regression models, including treatment, sarcopenia status, and their interactions, were fitted with sequential adjustments for relevant covariates.

Results: Of the 203 randomized participants, 119 (58.6%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Treatment-by-sarcopenia interactions were not statistically significant. Stratum-specific analyses suggested a pattern of greater functional improvement with FIRM than with conventional rehabilitation, particularly among participants with low HGS and, to a lesser extent, those with sarcopenia. In the fully adjusted models, FIRM was associated with greater improvement in independent ambulation among participants with low HGS (odds ratio, 4.25; risk difference, + 34.7%; P = 0.014).

Conclusions: Integrated rehabilitation may provide greater functional benefits than conventional rehabilitation in older adults with hip fractures, particularly among those with low muscle strength. However, given the lack of statistically significant interaction effects and the attenuation of the observed associations in the fully adjusted models, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory.

根据肌肉力量和肌肉减少状态对老年髋部骨折患者进行综合康复和门诊恢复:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
目的:骨骼肌减少症和肌肉力量受损在老年髋部骨折患者中很常见,并与功能恢复不良密切相关。尽管综合多学科康复可改善髋部骨折后的预后,但其益处是否因基线肌力或肌肉减少严重程度而异尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨脆性骨折综合康复管理(FIRM)的功能益处是否因老年人髋部骨折术后肌肉减少状态和握力(HGS)的不同而不同。方法:这是一项多中心随机对照试验的二级分析,比较FIRM与常规康复对≥65岁髋部骨折手术成人的影响。主要终点是12个月时的独立行走。骨骼肌减少症采用三种方法进行分类:骨骼肌减少症与非骨骼肌减少症、三级分类(非骨骼肌减少症、可能的骨骼肌减少症和骨骼肌减少症)、低HGS与正常HGS。Logistic回归模型,包括治疗、肌肉减少症状态及其相互作用,通过相关协变量的顺序调整进行拟合。结果:203名随机参与者中,119名(58.6%)完成了12个月的随访。治疗与肌肉减少症的相互作用无统计学意义。层特异性分析表明,FIRM比传统康复有更大的功能改善模式,特别是在低HGS的参与者中,在较小程度上,肌肉减少症患者。在完全调整的模型中,FIRM与低HGS患者独立行走能力的改善相关(优势比为4.25;风险差为+ 34.7%;P = 0.014)。结论:对于髋部骨折的老年人,特别是那些肌肉力量较弱的老年人,综合康复可能比常规康复提供更大的功能益处。然而,考虑到在完全调整的模型中缺乏统计上显著的相互作用效应和观察到的关联衰减,这些发现应该被解释为探索性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书