{"title":"Advancing Hearing Care Equity: Outcomes From a Community-Based Hearing Aid Assistance Program for Underserved Adults.","authors":"Zahra Jafari, Sarah Mason, Sarah Wilson","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Access to hearing services is often limited by health care disparities and financial constraints. This retrospective longitudinal study examined hearing aid uptake and outcomes among low-income adults enrolled in the Dalhousie Hearing Aid Assistance Program-Community Services, a provincially funded initiative in Nova Scotia, Canada, designed to broaden access to hearing health care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Demographic, audiologic, and self-reported hearing aid data were extracted from the digital patient management system. The study included 179 participants, with a mean age of 59.30 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (89.0%) received bilateral amplification. Average hearing thresholds indicated bilateral hearing loss in the moderate range. Tinnitus was reported by 47.5% of participants (18.40% persistent, 29.10% intermittent), most commonly affecting both ears (68.45%). Participants demonstrated strong hearing aid uptake, with an average daily use of 9.20 hr. Significant improvements were observed, including reductions in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) total and subscale scores (<i>p</i> < .001) at both 3-month and 12-month follow-ups relative to postfitting baseline, as well as substantial gains on the annual Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) outcomes (> 80%), with a large correlation between Degree of Change and Final Ability outcomes (<i>r</i> = .716, <i>p</i> < .001). Hierarchical linear regression analysis indicated that average hearing loss (<i>p</i> < .003) and gender (<i>p</i> < .048) were significant predictors of HHIE-S scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate significant improvements in perceived hearing handicap and functional outcomes and highlight the value of accessible, community-based hearing aid services in reducing barriers to care and promoting hearing care equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Access to hearing services is often limited by health care disparities and financial constraints. This retrospective longitudinal study examined hearing aid uptake and outcomes among low-income adults enrolled in the Dalhousie Hearing Aid Assistance Program-Community Services, a provincially funded initiative in Nova Scotia, Canada, designed to broaden access to hearing health care.
Method: Demographic, audiologic, and self-reported hearing aid data were extracted from the digital patient management system. The study included 179 participants, with a mean age of 59.30 years.
Results: Most participants (89.0%) received bilateral amplification. Average hearing thresholds indicated bilateral hearing loss in the moderate range. Tinnitus was reported by 47.5% of participants (18.40% persistent, 29.10% intermittent), most commonly affecting both ears (68.45%). Participants demonstrated strong hearing aid uptake, with an average daily use of 9.20 hr. Significant improvements were observed, including reductions in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) total and subscale scores (p < .001) at both 3-month and 12-month follow-ups relative to postfitting baseline, as well as substantial gains on the annual Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) outcomes (> 80%), with a large correlation between Degree of Change and Final Ability outcomes (r = .716, p < .001). Hierarchical linear regression analysis indicated that average hearing loss (p < .003) and gender (p < .048) were significant predictors of HHIE-S scores.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate significant improvements in perceived hearing handicap and functional outcomes and highlight the value of accessible, community-based hearing aid services in reducing barriers to care and promoting hearing care equity.
期刊介绍：
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
