Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Urine-Based Molecular Testing for Urogenital Tuberculosis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lin Fang, Xiaohong Chen, Jiangying Chen, Xiaoqin Liao, Jiandong Lin
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Urine-Based Molecular Testing for Urogenital Tuberculosis.","authors":"Lin Fang, Xiaohong Chen, Jiangying Chen, Xiaoqin Liao, Jiandong Lin","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267906.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early confirmation of urogenital tuberculosis (UGTB) remains challenging in routine practice because conventional culture is slow and has variable sensitivity. Urine-based molecular testing has emerged as a rapid alternative, but its performance estimates vary across studies. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic value of urine-based molecular testing, including Xpert <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>/rifampicin, multiplex polymerase chain reaction and loop-mediated isothermal amplification, for UGTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were generated with a bivariate random-effects model. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and Fagan nomogram were used for visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 diagnostic accuracy studies, comprising 1697 patients with high clinical suspicion of UGTB, were analysed. Pooled sensitivity was 0.748 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.566-0.871), pooled specificity was 0.962 (95% CI: 0.932-0.979), pooled DOR was 121.77 (95% CI: 37.86-391.68), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.93. Studies using bacterial culture as the reference standard yielded a pooled specificity of 1.000, whereas those using a composite reference standard yielded a pooled specificity of 0.934. With a 20% pre-test probability, a positive test increased the post-test probability to 83%, while a negative test lowered it to 6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urine-based molecular testing shows high diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility for UGTB. It may serve as an adjunctive test for early rapid confirmation, especially when interpreted alongside clinical, imaging and culture findings. The PROSPERO Registration: The study was registered on https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (registration number: CRD420261373256; registration link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261373256).</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"79 6","pages":"980-991"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267906.114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early confirmation of urogenital tuberculosis (UGTB) remains challenging in routine practice because conventional culture is slow and has variable sensitivity. Urine-based molecular testing has emerged as a rapid alternative, but its performance estimates vary across studies. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic value of urine-based molecular testing, including Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin, multiplex polymerase chain reaction and loop-mediated isothermal amplification, for UGTB.

Methods: Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were generated with a bivariate random-effects model. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and Fagan nomogram were used for visualization.

Results: A total of 14 diagnostic accuracy studies, comprising 1697 patients with high clinical suspicion of UGTB, were analysed. Pooled sensitivity was 0.748 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.566-0.871), pooled specificity was 0.962 (95% CI: 0.932-0.979), pooled DOR was 121.77 (95% CI: 37.86-391.68), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.93. Studies using bacterial culture as the reference standard yielded a pooled specificity of 1.000, whereas those using a composite reference standard yielded a pooled specificity of 0.934. With a 20% pre-test probability, a positive test increased the post-test probability to 83%, while a negative test lowered it to 6%.

Conclusions: Urine-based molecular testing shows high diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility for UGTB. It may serve as an adjunctive test for early rapid confirmation, especially when interpreted alongside clinical, imaging and culture findings. The PROSPERO Registration: The study was registered on https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (registration number: CRD420261373256; registration link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261373256).

泌尿生殖系统结核尿基分子检测的系统评价与荟萃分析。
背景:泌尿生殖系统结核(UGTB)的早期确诊在常规实践中仍然具有挑战性,因为常规培养速度慢且敏感性可变。基于尿液的分子检测已经成为一种快速的替代方法,但其性能估计在不同的研究中有所不同。本系统综述评价了基于尿的分子检测对UGTB的诊断价值,包括Xpert结核分枝杆菌/利福平、多重聚合酶链反应和环介导的等温扩增。方法:使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2评估偏倚风险。采用双变量随机效应模型生成综合敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断优势比(DOR)。采用总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)和Fagan图进行可视化。结果:共分析了14项诊断准确性研究,包括1697例临床高怀疑UGTB的患者。合并敏感性为0.748(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.566 ~ 0.871),合并特异性为0.962 (95% CI: 0.932 ~ 0.979),合并DOR为121.77 (95% CI: 37.86 ~ 391.68),合并SROC曲线下面积为0.93。以细菌培养物为参比标准的研究的总特异性为1.000,而使用复合参比标准的研究的总特异性为0.934。测试前的概率为20%,阳性测试将测试后的概率提高到83%,而阴性测试将其降低到6%。结论:基于尿液的分子检测对UGTB具有较高的诊断准确性和临床应用价值。它可以作为早期快速确诊的辅助测试,特别是当与临床、影像学和培养结果一起解释时。普洛斯彼罗注册:该研究已在https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/上注册(注册号:CRD420261373256;注册链接:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261373256)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书